3种材质个性化一体化桩核改向修复上颌中切牙的三维有限元研究

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.10.011

口腔医学研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 954-958.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.10.011

3种材质个性化一体化桩核改向修复上颌中切牙的三维有限元研究

郭晓阳, 陈志宇^*, 付艺璇, 李绍萍, 高毛毛

河北医科大学口腔医学院·口腔医院修复科,河北省口腔医学重点实验室,河北省口腔疾病临床医学研究中心河北石家庄 050017

收稿日期:2022-01-11 出版日期:2022-10-28 发布日期:2022-10-20
通讯作者: *陈志宇,E-mail: kqxfchen@163.com
作者简介:郭晓阳(1991~ ),女,河北石家庄人,硕士在读,主治医师,研究方向:口腔修复学。
基金资助:
2019年度河北省老年病防治经费项目(编号:冀财预付[2019]761号);河北省“三三三人才工程”资助项目(编号:A202102010)

Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Maxillary Central Incisors Restored with Three Kinds of Personalized Custom Post-and-core with Angles

GUO Xiaoyang, CHEN Zhiyu^*, FU Yixuan, LI Shaoping, Gao Maomao

Department of Prosthodontics, Hebei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Hebei Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017, China

Received:2022-01-11 Online:2022-10-28 Published:2022-10-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 通过三维有限元分析的方法观察个性化一体化桩核改向修复不同角度倾斜的上颌中切牙后应力分布特征。方法: 创建具有不同倾斜角度的上颌中切牙及改向修复的桩核-冠有限元模型。桩核材质采用铸造金钯合金,玻璃纤维增强树脂与碳纤维增强聚醚醚酮(CFR-PEEK),分析全瓷冠修复后不同模型在正中咬合接触受力下桩核、牙本质的等效应力分布情况。结果: 改向角度相同时,金钯桩核应力最高,对应的牙本质应力最低;CFR-PEEK桩核应力最低,牙本质应力最高。同一材质改向修复时,桩核应力与牙本质应力随核向唇侧倾斜角度增大而减小。结论: 固定载荷方向下,桩核角度的改变对修复体和牙体抗力影响并不显著;牙本质肩领完整时,建议选择低弹性模量桩核修复。

关键词: 三维有限元, 一体化桩核, 应力分布, 上颌中切牙

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the stress distribution characteristics of different materials custom post-and-core at different angles for maxillary central incisor by three-dimensional finite element analysis. Methods: The models with different inclination angles of post-and-core-and-crown in the maxillary central incisor were created. Three post-and-core materials were used in the model: cast gold-palladium alloy, glass fiber reinforced resin, and carbon fiber reinforced polyether ether ketone (CFR-PEEK). They were finally restored with an all-ceramic crown. The equivalent stresses in the post-and-core and dentin of the different models were analyzed under centric occlusion. Results: At the same angle, the highest stresses in the cast gold-palladium post-and-core correspond to the lowest stresses in the dentin. The CFR-PEEK post-and-core exhibited the lowest equivalent stress, corresponding to the highest stress in dentin. The stress of post-and-core and dentin decreases with increasing buccal angle for the same material. Conclusion: The angle of the post-and-core had no significant effect on restoration and dentin resistance under the same loading direction. The post-and-core with a lower elastic modulus is recommended when the dentin ferrule is intact.

Key words: three-dimensional finite element, customed post-and-core, stress analysis, maxillary central incisor

郭晓阳, 陈志宇, 付艺璇, 李绍萍, 高毛毛. 3种材质个性化一体化桩核改向修复上颌中切牙的三维有限元研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(10): 954-958.

GUO Xiaoyang, CHEN Zhiyu, FU Yixuan, LI Shaoping, Gao Maomao. Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Maxillary Central Incisors Restored with Three Kinds of Personalized Custom Post-and-core with Angles[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2022, 38(10): 954-958.

参考文献

[1] Fernandes AS, Shetty S, Coutinho I. Factors determining post selection: a literature review[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2003, 90(6): 556-562.
[2] Alhajj MN, Qi CH, Sayed ME, et al. Fracture resistance of titanium and fiber dental posts: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Prosthodont, 2022, 31(5):374-384.
[3] Lee KS, Shin JH, Kim JE, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a tooth restored with high performance polymer PEKK post-core system: A 3D finite element analysis[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2017, 2017:1373127.
[4] Ozarslan M, Buyukkaplan US, Ozarslan MM. Comparison of the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth restored with polyether ether ketone, zirconia and glass-fibre post-core systems[J]. Int J Clin Pract, 2021, 75(9): e14440.
[5] Benli M, Eker Gumus B, Kahraman Y, et al. Surface characterization and bonding properties of milled polyetheretherketone dental posts[J]. Odontology, 2020, 108(4): 596-606.
[6] 于豪,白石柱,冯志宏,等.聚醚醚酮用于桩核冠修复的三维有限元分析[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2020,36(1):5-9.
[7] Sarot JR, Contar CM, Cruz AC, et al. Evaluation of the stress distribution in CFR-PEEK dental implants by the three-dimensional finite element method[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2010, 21(7): 2079-2085.
[8] Gloria A, Maietta S, Martorelli M, et al. FE analysis of conceptual hybrid composite endodontic post designs in anterior teeth[J]. Dent Mater, 2018, 34(7): 1063-1071.
[9] 王频,范丽苑,谢翠柳,等.不同体积和材料的桩核修复薄弱根管的应力分析[J].口腔医学研究,2016,32(9):953-956.
[10] 武伟,杨竹丽,何开云.安氏Ⅱ类错牙合与正常软硬组织X线头影测量对比[J].齐鲁医学杂志,2008,23(1):38-40.
[11] 夏春明,兰赟,禹杰.上颌前牙带角度桩冠的三维有限元应力分析[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2003,19(6): 610-612.
[12] 周团锋,张相皞,王新知.一体化计算机辅助设计与制作氧化锆桩核的三维有限元分析[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2015,47(1):78-84.
[13] Tekin S, Adiguzel O, Cangul S, et al. Evaluation of the use of PEEK material in post-core and crown restorations using finite element analysis[J]. Am J Dent, 2020, 33(5): 251-257.
[14] Plotino G, Grande NM, Bedini R, et al. Flexural properties of endodontic posts and human root dentin[J]. Dent Mater, 2007, 23(9): 1129-1135.
[15] Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. The influence of ferrule effect and length of cast and FRC posts on the stresses in anterior teeth[J]. Dent Mater, 2013, 29(9): e227-237.
[16] 屈直,王稚英.不同材料属性桩核以不同角度修复上颌中切牙缺损的适应性[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2010,14(12):2175-2178.
[17] Hou Y, Wu G, Qing H, et al. Effect of a differently tilted angle of mandibular premolar on fracture resistance of 3 postcore restorations[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2011, 112(4): 518-523.
[18] Haralur SB. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with various esthetic posts[J]. Technol Health Care, 2021, 29(2): 243-252.
[19] 齐景,郭长军,陈树国,等.不同材料桩核冠修复上颌改向中切牙的三维有限元分析[J].中国医学工程,2015,23(11):18-19.
[20] Figueiredo FE, Martins-Filho PR, Faria-E-Silva AL. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(3): 309-316.

3种材质个性化一体化桩核改向修复上颌中切牙的三维有限元研究

Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Maxillary Central Incisors Restored with Three Kinds of Personalized Custom Post-and-core with Angles

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	杜军, 邱延菊, 万哲. 植入位点及轴向对上颌中切牙即刻种植即刻负重后微动度影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(9): 831-836.
[2]	蔡长宇, 冯娜, 杨玉娥. 垫底材料及厚度对下颌第二乳磨牙嵌体修复应力分布影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(7): 654-658.
[3]	刘潇, 陈曦, 李宝, 马改兰, 宫月君, 郭涛. 夹层技术不同充填材料和咬合角度对非龋性颈部缺损牙体应力分布的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(5): 447-453.
[4]	庞亚倩, 刘亮, 冯大军, 李婕, 王栋, 张凯. 下颌骨正中联合部囊性病变有限元建模及生物力学研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(3): 250-254.
[5]	余慧敏, 徐多玲. 吸烟对上颌中切牙牙槽骨分型影响——CBCT研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(9): 825-829.
[6]	缑小蕊, 周政, 姜丹丹, 陈苗苗, 纪东. 种植覆盖义齿修复不同骨质类型的KennedyⅠ类缺失的三维有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(9): 855-860.
[7]	苏涛, 王星星, 向彪, 吴刚, 邹敏. 不同刚度的无托槽隐形矫治器扩大上颌牙弓的有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(5): 454-458.
[8]	李茜茜, 康婷, 陈燕语, 宋丹阳, 郭玲. 上颌中切牙斜形折裂修复设计的有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(3): 259-263.
[9]	李希光, 郅克谦, 高岭, 张博, 周民战, 肖林京. 基于三维有限元评价种植体不同倾斜角度在上颌后牙区骨量不足的应力分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(7): 671-675.
[10]	陈俊良, 刘旭琳, 张潇月, 田欣, 何芸. 短种植体修复牙槽骨严重吸收的下颌第二磨牙的三维有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(3): 246-250.
[11]	朱彦霏,马伟程,耿金欢,刘茜,丁玉梅,李蜀鄂. 锥形束CT测量上颌中切牙根径及骨板厚度研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(2): 159-162.
[12]	李志进, 翁雁鸣, 周荣华, 杜姣, 熊才华, 董青山, 郭家平. 上颌中切牙种植累及鼻腭管的处理的初步研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(10): 948-952.
[13]	康婷, 石思琼, 赵威, 郑睿, 李茜茜, 解静, 郭玲. 上颌第一前磨牙舌尖斜形折裂不同修复设计的有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(10): 953-956.
[14]	张彬, 安虹, 郭超, 杨贝贝, 王家亮. 牙槽骨水平吸收条件下上前牙全瓷联冠三维有限元模型的建立[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(1): 71-74.
[15]	陈江, 张雨晴. 现代口腔美学因素分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(10): 1033-1037.