不同牵引部位对上颌埋伏中切牙牙周应力分布的影响

口腔医学研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 1136-1139.

不同牵引部位对上颌埋伏中切牙牙周应力分布的影响

郝妍¹,回记芳²,郑文涛³,邵玶^1*

1. 哈尔滨医科大学附属口腔医院口腔正畸科黑龙江哈尔滨 150001;
2. 西安交通大学口腔医院陕西西安 710004;3. 沈阳工业大学辽宁沈阳 110023

收稿日期:2015-05-26 出版日期:2015-11-28 发布日期:2016-03-21
通讯作者: 邵玶,电话:0451-85553375
作者简介:郝妍(1990~),女,黑龙江人,研究生,主要从事正畸牙齿移动能力学研究。

Effects of Traction Position on the Periodontal Stress Distribution of Impacted Maxillary Central Incisor.

HAO Yan¹, HUI Ji-fang², ZHENG Wen-tao³, Shao Ping^1*

1. Department of Orthodontics, Stomatology Hospital Affiliated to Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, China; 2. Stomatology Hospital Affiliated to Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China; 3. Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110023, China

Received:2015-05-26 Online:2015-11-28 Published:2016-03-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:基于对上颌唇向倒置埋伏中切牙的三维有限元模型施加不同部位的牵引力,分析比较不同工况下牙周膜的应力分布,从而为临床进行上颌埋伏中切牙助萌治疗提供参考。方法:选取1名上颌中切牙唇向倒置埋伏阻生患者的锥体束CT(CBCT)原始数据,建立统一坐标系下上颌埋伏中切牙及其支持组织的三维有限元模型。在牙冠舌面切1/3、中1/3、颈1/3的中心分别施加在矢状方向上垂直于牙体长轴的30 g、60 g、90 g的牵引力,分析比较不同工况下牙周膜的应力分布情况。结果:不同牵引部位下,埋伏牙牙周应力分布特点类似。同一力值牵引,牵引部位越靠近牙颈部,牙周膜的应力越小;同一牵引部位,牵引力越大,牙周应力越大。结论:牵引部位应尽量位于切端,牵引力不宜超过60 g。

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the stress of periodontal tissues in different conditions by establishing the three dimensional finite element model of an impacted labial inverted maxillary central incisor and its supporting tissues,and to provide some reference for the treatment of impacted maxillary central incisor. Methods: Three-dimensional finite element model of impacted labial inverted maxillary central incisor and its periodontal tissues were established based on original data of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Various tractions (30g, 60g, 90g) were exerted on the incisal, middle and cervical of the lingual surface in the direction perpendicular to the impacted incisor, respectively. And then, different Von Mises stress was determined and analyzed. Results: The characteristics of stress distribution were similar in different traction position. The closer the traction to the cervix was, the smaller stress distribution in periodontal ligament was. The bigger the traction power was, the larger stress distribution in periodontal ligament was. Conclusion:The traction position had better be exerted on the incisal margin and the optimal traction power should not exceed 60g.

中图分类号:

R783.5

郝妍,回记芳,郑文涛,邵玶. 不同牵引部位对上颌埋伏中切牙牙周应力分布的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(11): 1136-1139.

HAO Yan, HUI Ji-fang, ZHENG Wen-tao, Shao Ping. Effects of Traction Position on the Periodontal Stress Distribution of Impacted Maxillary Central Incisor.[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2015, 31(11): 1136-1139.

参考文献

[1] Grover PS,Lorton L. The incidence of unerupted permanent teeth and related clinical cases [J]. Oral Surg OralMed Oral Pathol, 1985, 59(4)∶420-425
[2]王镶珊,胡荣党.上颌埋伏阻生中切牙的影像学分类[J].上海口腔医学,2012,21(2)∶185-189
[3] Wagner A, Krach W, Schicho K, et al. A 3-dimensional finite element analysis investigating the biomechanical behavior of the mandible and plate osteosynthesis in cases of fractures of the condylar process [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2002, 94(6)∶678-686
[4] Toparli M. Stress analysis in a post-restored tooth utilizing the finite element method [J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2003, 30(5)∶470-476
[5] 王秀颖,孙浩,戴微微,等.导杆式矫治器治疗上颌唇侧倒置埋伏中切牙[J].口腔医学研究,2014,30(12)∶1149-1152
[6] 李明霞,王光平,杨江华.锥形束 CT 诊断上颌埋伏阻生中切牙价值研究[J].泸州医学院学报,2014,37(5)∶500-503
[7] Tanne K. Stress induced in the periodontal tissue at the initial phase of the application of various types of orthodontic forces:3-dimensional analysis using a finite elementmethod [J]. OsakaDaigaqu Shigaku Zasshi, 1983,28(2)∶209-261
[8] Middleton J, Jones M,Wilson A.The role of the periodontal ligament in bonemodeling: the initial development of a time-dependent finite elementmodel [J]. Am J Orthod DentofacialOrthop,1996,109(2)∶155-162
[9] 赵志河,房兵.尖牙牙周膜应力分布的研究: 三维有限元分析[J].华西口腔医学杂志, 1994, 12(4)∶301-302
[10] 张隆祺,王佛汉.埋伏阻生牙的外科导萌治疗[J].口腔医学纵横,2000,16(1)∶22- 24
[11] 王勤波,王玲,刘又南.埋伏倒置上中切牙导萌正畸中旋转中心变化规律的研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2004,20(2)∶204-206
[12] Puente MI,GalbanL,Cobo JM. Initial stress differences between tipping and torque movements. A three-dimensional finite element analysis [J]. European Journal of Orthodontics,1996,18(4)∶329-339
[13] Lee BW. Relationship between tooth-movement rate and estimated pressure applied [J]. J Dent Res,1965,44(5)∶1053
[14] Reitan K.Biomechanical principles and reactions [A]. In:Graber TM,Swain BF.On thodontics:Current principles and techniques [M]. St Louis:CV Mosby Co,1985,136-138

[1]	陈慧霞, 何展飞, 秦燕军, 李媛. 替牙期伴功能性旋转前牙反牙合矫治方法的回顾性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(2): 198-202.
[2]	马艺萌, 高辉, 肖丹娜, 方姝. 基于二维投影建立骨性Ⅱ类错牙合畸形数学模型研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(1): 77-81.
[3]	陈俊驰, 郭玲. 上中切牙龈缘高度不对称的相关美学参数研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(1): 82-86.
[4]	黄鹂,周泽渊,王欣,宿晨曦,邹淑娟. 组织蛋白酶K抑制剂对正畸牙移动牙周组织改建的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(12): 1250-1253.
[5]	白蕊, 韦代伦, 贺涵, 吴稀, 周容, 黄跃. 舌侧托槽抗扭转性能的三维有限元分析研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(11): 1218-1222.
[6]	季骏，王天丛，张博，罗佳娣，刘澍，胡勤刚. 安氏II类1分类单双颌前磨牙减数对下颌第三磨牙影响的CBCT研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(10): 1110-1113.
[7]	高国杰, 章筱悦, 沈刚. 多囊蛋白-1在生长期小鼠颅底蝶枕软骨联合的表达[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(8): 824-827.
[8]	李猷, 张淋坤, 张锡忠, 康永歌, 马遥. 大鼠正畸牙移动中NF-κB通路相关差异基因的GO分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(8): 832-836.
[9]	顾郁嘉, 张卫兵, 张玺, 于剑南, 王林, 赵春洋. 上颌尖牙-侧切牙唇侧易位的分步牵引治疗[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(7): 754-757.
[10]	朱玉, 康启超, 阎秀林. 上颌埋伏尖牙引起切牙牙根吸收的预测[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(7): 777-781.
[11]	陈立艳, 刘志杰, 苑芳连, 张苗苗, 王兰珠. 颧牙槽嵴区骨宽度及皮质骨厚度的CBCT测量分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(6): 637-641.
[12]	魏晓慧, 刘利君, 刘红, 宋效庆, 陈天杰, 刘称称. CPP-ACP/ACFP预处理的牙本质与树脂粘结剂粘结作用的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(6): 642-645.
[13]	孟秋菊, 王磊昌, 杜熹. FRⅢ矫治器矫治术后的颌面部软硬组织变化及其相关性分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(6): 654-657.
[14]	常琳, 张端强. 正畸间接粘结技术进展的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(6): 681-684.
[15]	尹硕,高辉,肖丹娜,赵明阳. 前牙覆盖覆牙合对下唇软组织形态的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(5): 509-512.