口腔医学研究

口腔医学研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 531-533.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2016.05.027

• 临床研究论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种微螺钉种植体支抗在上颌后牙根间区的稳定性研究

雷菲菲 ,梁芮* ,张晓洁, 曾俊玲, 林楚如   

  1. 深圳市第二人民医院口腔科 广东 深圳 581000
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-31 出版日期:2016-05-26 发布日期:2016-05-26
  • 通讯作者: 梁芮,电话:18938960163
  • 作者简介:雷菲菲(1982~ ),女,陕西人,博士,主治医师,主要从事口腔正畸临床治疗工作。

Comparison of Success Rate of Two Kinds of Micro-implant System in Posterior Area

LEI Fei-fei, LIANG Rui*, ZHANG Xiao-jie, ZENG Jun-ling, LING Chu-ru.   

  1. Department of Stomatology, The Second People’s Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 581000, China
  • Received:2015-07-31 Online:2016-05-26 Published:2016-05-26

PDF (PC)

338

摘要： 目的:对比两种材质(钛钉和不锈钢钉)微螺钉种植体支抗植入上颌后牙根间区的脱落率,并对各类影响因素进行分析,为医生选择设计提供参考。方法:102例正畸患者平均年龄21岁(13~46岁)。正畸设计强支抗,在上颌后牙根间区共植入172枚微螺钉种植体支抗。研究按照种植体类型(钛钉1.6 mm×8 mm,不锈钢钉1.5 mm×8 mm)、骨面型(高角和非高角)和年龄(成人和青少年)进行分组。统计分析使用SPSS 13.0软件包。采用卡方检验比较种植体类型、骨面型、年龄对脱落的影响。结果:种植体类型和骨面型对脱落率的影响具有统计学意义(P<0.05);成年和青少年脱落率的差别无统计学意义。结论:钛钉植入上颌后牙根间区稳定性优于不锈钢钉。高角患者种植体脱落率较高。

关键词: 钛钉, 不锈钢微螺钉, 种植体支抗

Abstract: Objective: To compare the stability of two kinds of micro-screw system placed in maxillary posterior area. Methods: 102 patients were selected with 176 micro-screws placed. Possible influencing factors including the kinds of micro-screws, age and skeletal patterns were analyzed by Chi-square tests through SPSS Statistical Package. Results: Different kinds of micro-screws and different skeletal patterns exhibited significantly different failure rates (P<0.05). No significant difference was found between age groups. Conclusion: Higher failure rates were conformed in group of stainless steel micro-screws compared with Ti-alloy micro-screws. The failure rates in high angle cases were higher than those of lower and average angle cases.

中图分类号: