双波长激光结合数字化导板在上颌埋伏中切牙牵引中的随机对照研究

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2023.08.008

口腔医学研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 701-706.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2023.08.008

双波长激光结合数字化导板在上颌埋伏中切牙牵引中的随机对照研究

丁月¹, 谢玲^1,2*, 任乐文¹, 田文仙¹

1.安徽医科大学合肥口腔临床学院安徽医科大学第五临床医学院安徽合肥 230601;
2.合肥市口腔医院西区儿童口腔科安徽合肥 230601

收稿日期:2023-03-09 发布日期:2023-08-17
通讯作者: *谢玲,E-mail:20246426@qq.com
作者简介:丁月(1994~ ),女,安徽合肥人,硕士,研究方向:儿童口腔医学。
基金资助:
2021年安徽医科大学校科研基金(编号:2021xkj252)

A Randomized Comparative Study of Dual-wavelength Laser Combined with Digital Guide Plate in Maxillary Impacted Central Incisor Distraction

DING Yue¹, XIE Ling^1,2*, REN Lewen¹, TIAN Wenxian¹

1. Hefei Stomatological Clinical College of Anhui Medical University, The Fifth Clinical College of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230601, China;
2. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Hefei Stomatological Hospital West, Hefei 230601, China

Received:2023-03-09 Published:2023-08-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 探究双波长激光结合数字化导板应用于上颌埋伏中切牙牵引中的临床疗效。方法: 收集2020年6月~2022年6月就诊于合肥市口腔医院西区儿童口腔科的上颌中切牙埋伏阻生的患儿共20例,年龄7~10岁。随机分为激光导板组和传统手术组,分别记录两组手术时长、术中出血量和疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)值,以及在术后第1天、第3天、第7天记录两组VAS值和术后第1个月、第2个月和第3个月记录托槽的脱落率。结果: 激光导板组术中出血量少于传统手术组;激光导板组的平均手术时间为(22.4±5.9) min,传统手术组的平均手术时间是(44.0±16.8) min;在术后第1天和术后第3天激光导板组在较低VAS评分等级中的人数低于传统手术组,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05);而两组在术中和术后第7天的VAS评分等级及术后1个月、2个月和3个月托槽脱落率的比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论: 双波长激光结合数字化导板在上颌埋伏恒切牙的牵引中是一种更加舒适和省时省力的治疗方法。

关键词: 双波长激光, 埋伏牙, 上颌中切牙, 导板

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of dual-wavelength laser combined with digital guide plate in the traction of maxillary impacted central incisors. Methods: From June 2020 to June 2022, 20 children with impacted maxillary central incisors, aged 7-10 years old, were collected from the Department of Pediatric Stomatology, West District, Hefei City Stomatological Hospital. The operation time, blood loss, and VAS value were recorded. The VAS value was recorded on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day after operation. The bracket dropout rate was recorded on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd month after operation. Results: The blood loss of the laser combined with digital guide group was less than that of the traditional scalpel group. In terms of operation duration, the average operation time in the laser combined with digital guide group was (22.4±5.9) min, and that in the traditional scalpel group was (44.0±16.8) min. The first day and the third day after surgery laser guide group number in the hierarchy of lower VAS score less than traditional scalpel group, and the results were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS values during operation and on the 7th day after operation and in the bracket dropout rate at 1, 2, and 3 months after operation between two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: It is a more comfortable and time-saving method to treat the maxillary impacted permanent incisors with the combination of dual-wavelength laser and digital guide plate.

Key words: dual-wavelength laser, impacted tooth, maxillary central incisor, guide plate

丁月, 谢玲, 任乐文, 田文仙. 双波长激光结合数字化导板在上颌埋伏中切牙牵引中的随机对照研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(8): 701-706.

DING Yue, XIE Ling, REN Lewen, TIAN Wenxian. A Randomized Comparative Study of Dual-wavelength Laser Combined with Digital Guide Plate in Maxillary Impacted Central Incisor Distraction[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2023, 39(8): 701-706.

参考文献

[1] 邱蔚六.口腔颌面外科学[M].第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2000. 68-81.
[2] 林久祥,傅民魁.口腔正畸学[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2005. 189-190.
[3] Mockut G, Klimait G, Smailien D. The morphology of impacted maxillary central incisors: A systematic review [J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2022, 58(4): 462.
[4] Al-Zoubi H, Alharbi AA, Ferguson DJ, et al. Frequency of impacted teeth and categorization of impacted canines: A retrospective radiographic study using orthopantomograms [J]. Eur J Dent, 2017,11(1): 117-121.
[5] Moog U, De Die-Smulders CE, Schrander-Stumpel CT, et al. Holoprosencephaly: the maastricht experience [J]. Genet Couns, 2001, 12(3): 287-298.
[6] Batstone MD, Macleod AW. Oral and maxillofacial surgical considerations for a case of Hutchinson-Gilford progeria [J]. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2002, 12(6): 429-432.
[7] Pinho T, Neves M, Alves C. Impacted maxillary central incisor: surgical exposure and orthodontic treatment [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011, 140(2): 256-265.
[8] 胡莲.手术导萌联合口腔正畸治疗对上颌埋伏阻生牙患者疼痛及美观度的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2020,5(27): 113-114.
[9] Bhikoo C, Xu J, Sun H, et al. Factors affecting treatment duration of labial inversely impacted maxillary central incisors [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2018, 153(5): 708-715.
[10] 王镶珊,胡荣党. 上颌埋伏阻生中切牙的治疗[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志,2010,37(2): 240-243.
[11] 李兴军. 埋伏牙的正畸手术治疗探讨[J]. 吉林医学,2010,31(34): 6299.
[12] Kuvvetli SS, Seymen F, Gencay K. Management of an unerupted dilacerated maxillary central incisor: a case report [J]. Dent Traumatol, 2007, 23(4): 257-261.
[13] Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Soft-tissue lasers in orthodontics: an overview [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008, 133(4 Suppl): S110-S114.
[14] Soundarajan S, Rajasekar A. Comparative evaluation of combined efficacy of methylene blue mediated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (a-PDT) using 660 nm diode laser versus Erbium-chromium-yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) laser as an adjunct to scaling and root planing on clinical parameters in supportive periodontal therapy: A randomized split-mouth trial [J]. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2022, 39: 102971.
[15] Coachman C, Valavanis K, Silveira FC, et al. The crown lengthening double guide and the digital Perio analysis [J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2023, 35(1):215-221.
[16] 白沙草,王朝彦. 传统切除与激光切除在下唇黏液腺囊肿手术中的效果比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志,2019,23(17): 110-112.
[17] Wang Z, Zhao SY, He WS, et al. Application of digital positioning guide plates for the surgical extraction of multiple impacted supernumerary teeth: A case report and review of literature [J]. World J Clin Cases, 2022, 10(27): 9886-9896.
[18] Tripathi PB, Nelson JS, Wong BJ. Posttraumatic laser treatment of soft tissue injury [J]. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, 2017, 25(4): 617-628.
[19] Negosanti F, Silvestri M, Bennardo L, et al. Nd:YAG laser in association with pulsed dye laser for the treatment of PHACES syndrome [J]. Dermatol Reports, 2021, 13(1): 8751.
[20] Sun H, Hu R, Ren M, et al. The treatment timing of labial inversely impacted maxillary central incisors: A prospective study [J]. Angle Orthod, 2016, 86(5): 768-774.
[21] Prabhakar A, Lokeshwari M, Naik SV, et al. Efficacy of caries removal by carie-care and erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser in primary molars: A scanning electron microscope study [J]. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2018, 11(4): 323-329.
[22] Bianchi N, Lorenzi C, Pinto A, et al. Upper-lip laser frenectomy with a diode laser in a pediatric patient: a case report [J]. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents, 2021, 35(3 Suppl. 1): 29-35.
[23] de Santana-Santos T, de Souza-Santos aA, Martins-Filho PR, et al. Prediction of postoperative facial swelling, pain and trismus following third molar surgery based on preoperative variables [J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2013, 18(1): e65-e70.
[24] Dalaie K, Mir M, Ghaffari S. Laser assisted surgical and orthodontic treatment of a dilacerated impacted maxillary incisor: A case report [J]. Front Dent, 2021, 18: 30.

双波长激光结合数字化导板在上颌埋伏中切牙牵引中的随机对照研究

A Randomized Comparative Study of Dual-wavelength Laser Combined with Digital Guide Plate in Maxillary Impacted Central Incisor Distraction

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈涛, 马晓威, 姚琴, 史亚伟, 王东苗, 程杰. 儿童和青少年上颌前牙区埋伏多生牙对邻近中切牙发育萌出影响的CBCT影像学分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(6): 500-504.
[2]	贺志肖, 贾淑清, 吴鸿昭, 撒悦. 数字化技术在种植支持式全口固定义齿修复中的运用1例[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(6): 562-564.
[3]	王琳琳, 田洪盛, 徐莹, 樊明儒, 秦秀荣. 年轻上颌中切牙根尖区解剖结构的CBCT测量[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(5): 445-449.
[4]	徐静, 胡敏. 正畸微种植体定位方法研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(2): 101-104.
[5]	杜军, 邱延菊, 万哲. 植入位点及轴向对上颌中切牙即刻种植即刻负重后微动度影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(9): 831-836.
[6]	苏莉雯, 吴杨. 左上前牙区牙瘤伴埋伏阻生牙微创拔除术1例[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(9): 899-901.
[7]	梅幼敏, 张莹, 高美琴, 马春益, 孙汉堂, 孙敬伟, 徐家丽, 陈铭燕, 程玉叶. 数字化辅助美学牙冠延长术在上前牙再修复治疗中的应用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(5): 442-446.
[8]	吴凯鑫, 魏路明, 苏明, 袁长永, 王鹏来. 辅助配准装置用于严重伪影工况配准精度的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(4): 330-334.
[9]	苏明, 魏路明, 吴凯鑫, 袁长永, 王鹏来. 探究过预备法对上前牙区即刻种植精度的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(4): 340-343.
[10]	焦铁军, 李博龙, 傅娜. 数字化先锋钻导板和全程导板在全口种植手术中的精度分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(2): 120-124.
[11]	姜向瑞, 薛坤, 李葆祚. 不同骨质对牙支持式数字化种植导板精确度的影响分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(2): 134-137.
[12]	郭晓阳, 陈志宇, 付艺璇, 李绍萍, 高毛毛. 3种材质个性化一体化桩核改向修复上颌中切牙的三维有限元研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(10): 954-958.
[13]	薛媛, 李霞. 3D打印技术定位上颌第一磨牙钙化根管口的体外研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(9): 814-819.
[14]	杨鑫, 范亚伟. 计算机辅助设计个性化开髓导板的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(3): 222-226.
[15]	陈冬雷, 解东平, 郑政, 周俞强, 陈勇军, 王翔. 牙支持3D导板辅助穿刺卵圆孔射频热凝治疗三叉神经痛的疗效分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(12): 1099-1103.