经颌后切口腮腺前缘入路治疗髁突骨折的对照研究

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.04.012

口腔医学研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 355-359.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.04.012

经颌后切口腮腺前缘入路治疗髁突骨折的对照研究

杨双林¹, 赵文杰¹, 孙黎波², 吴双江², 付光新^1,2, 肖金刚^1,2,3*

1. 西南医科大学附属口腔医院口腔颌面外科四川泸州 646000;
2. 西南医科大学附属医院口腔颌面外科四川泸州 646000;
3. 西南医科大学附属口腔医院口颌面修复重建和再生实验室四川泸州 646000

收稿日期:2018-09-05 出版日期:2019-04-28 发布日期:2019-04-23
通讯作者: 肖金刚,E-mail:drxiaojingang@163.com
作者简介:杨双林(1992~ ),男,重庆奉节人,硕士在读,研究方向:口腔颌面修复与重建。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(编号:81870746、81371125); 中华口腔医学会西部行临床科研基金项目(编号:;CSA-W2017-08)

Clinical Research on Surgical Treatment of Condylar Fractures by Retromandibular Incision from Anteroparotid Approach

YANG Shuang-lin¹, ZHAO Wen-jie¹, SUN Li-bo², WU Shuang-jiang², FU Guang-xin^1,2, XIAO Jin-gang^1,2,3*

1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China;
2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China;
3. Orofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration Laboratory, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China

Received:2018-09-05 Online:2019-04-28 Published:2019-04-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 采用颌后切口经腮腺前缘入路与穿腮腺入路2种术式分别治疗髁突骨折,比较2种手术方式的术后疗效。方法: 选择2013年1月~2017年6月我院收治的52例髁突骨折病人,随机分为2组,改良切口组采用经颌后切口腮腺前缘入路,对照组采用传统的经颌后切口穿腮腺入路。术后随访6~36月,通过手术时间、骨折复位情况、开口度、咬合关系、面神经损伤及涎瘘发生率方面进行手术疗效的分析评价。结果: 改良切口组:手术平均时间为79.60 min;所有患者术后骨折复位、开口度及咬合关系恢复良好;出现1例暂时性面神经损伤;无涎瘘发生。对照组:手术平均时间为86.40 min;所有病人术后骨折复位、开口度及咬合关系恢复良好;出现5例暂时性面神经损伤,1例永久性面神经损伤;4例发生涎瘘。结论: 经颌后切口腮腺前缘入路的手术方法行髁突骨折切开复位内固定术可有效降低术中面神经损伤和术后涎瘘的发生率,且缩短了手术时间,没有增加其他并发症的发生,值得临床推广。

关键词: 髁突骨折, 手术入路, 颌后切口, 面神经损伤, 涎瘘

Abstract: Objective: To compare postoperative curative effects of condylar fractures by anteroparotid approach and transparotid approach of retromandibular incisions. Method: This study consisted of 52 cases with condylar fractures treated at the Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Southwest Medical University between January 2013 and June 2017. Fifty-two cases were randomly divided into modified incision group and control group. The patients of the modified incision group with condylar fractures accepted surgical treatment by the anteroparotid of retromandibular incisions, while the patients of the control group with condylar fractures accepted surgical treatment by the transparotid approach of retromandibular incisions. During the follow-up period of 6-36 months, the curative effects were evaluated based on operation time, fracture restoration, mouth opening, occlusion relationship, facial nerve injury, and salivary fistula. Results: Modified incision group: the average operation time was 79.60 min; all patients recovered well in fracture restoration, mouth opening and occlusion relationship; 1 case of temporary facial nerve injury occurred;and no case of salivary fistulas occurred. Control group: the average operation time was 86.40 min; all patients recovered well in fracture restoration, mouth opening and occlusion relationship; facial nerve injuries happened in 6 cases, 1 of which was permanent and 5 of which were temporary facial nerve injuries; 4 cases had postoperative salivary fistulas. Conclusion: Compared with the traditional transparotid approach of retromandibular incisions, the anteroparotid approach of retromandibular incisions effectively reduced the intraoperative facial nerve injury and postoperative salivary fistulas in the treatment of condylar fractures by opening reduction and internal fixation. Moreover, it shortened the operation time, and did not increase the incidence of other complications. Therefore, it was worthy of clinical expansion.

Key words: Condylar fracture, Surgical approach, Retromandibular incision, Facial nerve injury, Salivary fistula

杨双林, 赵文杰, 孙黎波, 吴双江, 付光新, 肖金刚. 经颌后切口腮腺前缘入路治疗髁突骨折的对照研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(4): 355-359.

YANG Shuang-lin, ZHAO Wen-jie, SUN Li-bo, WU Shuang-jiang, FU Guang-xin, XIAO Jin-gang. Clinical Research on Surgical Treatment of Condylar Fractures by Retromandibular Incision from Anteroparotid Approach[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2019, 35(4): 355-359.

参考文献

[1] Li H, Zhang G, Cui J, et al. A modified preauricular approach for treating intracapsular condylar fractures to prevent facial nerve injury: the supratemporalis approach [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 74(5):1013-1022.
[2] Zhou Z, Li Z, Ren J, et al. Digital diagnosis and treatment of mandibular condylar fractures based on Extensible Neuro imaging Archive Toolkit (XNAT) [J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(2): e0192831.
[3] Rozeboom A, Speksnijder C, Dubois L, et al. Is masticatory performance affected after a unilateral condylar fracture? A cross-sectional study [J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2018, 45(10):777-782.
[4] 李蕙,崔军辉,刘磊.下颌骨髁突骨折手术入路研究进展[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2016,34(3):322-324.
[5] Boffano P, Benech R, Gallesio C, et al. Current opinions on surgical treatment of fractures of the condylar head [J]. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr, 2014, 7(2):92-100.
[6] Costa FW, Bezerra MF, Ribeiro TR, et al. Biomechanical analysis of titanium plate systems in mandibular condyle fractures: a systematized literature review [J]. Acta Cir Bras, 2012, 27(6): 424-429.
[7] 刘慧,胡露露,王岳森,等.下颌骨髁突骨折手术治疗失败原因及防治分析——附13例病例报告[J].口腔医学研究,2018,34(3):278-281.
[8] 张益,张兴文.髁突骨折解剖复位及小型接骨板坚强内固定[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2001,36(2): 99-101.
[9] Rozeboom AVJ, Dubois L, Bos RRM, et al. Open treatment of condylar fractures via extraoral approaches: A review of complications [J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2018, 46(8): 1232-1240.
[10] Yao S, Zhou J, Li Z. Contrast analysis of open reduction and internal fixation and non-surgical treatment of condylar fracture: a meta-analysis [J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2014, 25(6): 2077-2080.
[11] Bhutia O, Kumar L, Jose A, et al. Evaluation of facial nerve following open reduction and internal fixation of subcondylar fracture through retromandibular transparotid approach [J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014, 52(3): 236-240.
[12] Kim BK, Kwon YD, Ohe JY, et al. Usefulness of the retromandibular transparotid approach for condylar neck and condylar base fractures[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2012, 23(3): 712-715.
[13] Yang L, Patil PM. The retormandibular transparotid approach to mandibular subcondylar fractures [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012, 41(4): 494-499.
[14] Shi J, Yuan H, Xu B, et al. Treatment of mandibular condyle fractures using a modified transparotid approach via the parotid mini-incision: experience with 31 cases [J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12): e83525.
[15] Shi D, Patil PM, Gupta R. Facial nerve injuries associated with the retromandibular transparotid approach for reduction and fixation of mandibular condyle fractures [J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2015, 43(3): 402-407.
[16] Tang W, Gao C, Long J, et al. Application of modified retromandibular approach indirectly from the anterior edge of the parotid gland in the surgical treatment of condylar fracture [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 67(3): 552-558.
[17] Balaji SM. Parotid fistula from transparotid approach for mandibular subcondylar fracture reduction [J]. Ann Maxillofac Surg, 2013, 3(2):182-184.
[18] Hou J, Chen L, Wang T, et al. A new surgical approach to treat medial or low condylar fractures: the minor parotid anterior approach [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2014, 117(3): 283-288.

经颌后切口腮腺前缘入路治疗髁突骨折的对照研究

Clinical Research on Surgical Treatment of Condylar Fractures by Retromandibular Incision from Anteroparotid Approach

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	雷欣, 邓书海, 关崧华, 黄辉, 陈玉婷, 刘虹. 螺旋CT三维重建和MRI在下颌骨髁突骨折中的临床应用比较[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(7): 746-750.
[2]	宋娟, 邓末宏. 口内入路行颌下腺导管深部结石取出术[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(7): 771-773.
[3]	刘慧, 胡露露, 王岳森, 陈青立, 方昌, 帕热克江·帕塔尔, 龚忠诚. 下颌骨髁突骨折手术治疗失败原因及防治分析——附13例病例报告[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(3): 278-281.
[4]	宋勇, 王俊林, 刘彦杰, 陈裕聪, 何浒杰, 王博灏. 以颞中静脉为解剖平面行冠状切口颞区翻瓣[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(1): 60-64.
[5]	向国林,邓末宏,李威,王琳琳,任雯,韩前超,龙星. 髁突矢状骨折继发颞下颌关节强直31例临床分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(11): 1179-1182.
[6]	张玲阁,龙星,邓末宏,蔡恒星,孟庆功. 下颌骨髁突骨折术后并发症的临床研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(11): 1183-1187.