口腔医学研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 681-685.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.07.015

• 口腔种植修复学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

两类冠延长术导板使用后的修复评价

刘琼1, 孙江1*, 邢文忠2   

  1. 1. 大连市口腔医院牙周科 辽宁 大连 116021;
    2. 大连市口腔医院修复科 辽宁 大连 116021
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-17 出版日期:2019-07-25 发布日期:2019-07-24
  • 通讯作者: 孙江,E-mail:sunjiang129@sina.com
  • 作者简介:刘琼(1980~ ),女,湖北襄阳人,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事牙周疾病方向的研究

Evaluation of the Restoration after Using Two Types of Crown Lengthening Templates

LIU Qiong1*, SUN Jiang1, XING Wenzhong2   

  1. 1. Department of Periodontology, Dalian Stomatological Hospital, Dalian 116021, China;
    2. Department of Prosthodontics, Dalian Stomatological Hospital, Dalian 116021, China.
  • Received:2018-12-17 Online:2019-07-25 Published:2019-07-24

摘要: 目的:评价压膜导板与诊断饰面导板应用于冠延长术后的修复效果。方法:选取需行上前牙冠延长术的30例患者随机分为2组,压膜组采用压膜导板,15例患者、76颗患牙,诊断饰面组采用诊断饰面导板,15例患者、80颗患牙。评价冠延长术后半年、1年术区探诊深度(probing depth,PD)、修复体边缘至龈缘距离、修复体质量及红色美学评分(Pink Esthetic Score,PES),并进行统计学分析。结果:术后2组的牙周状况均良好,仅有1个位点PD为5 mm,出现在术后1年的压膜组邻面,余下位点均≤4 mm。术后半年,2组修复体边缘位于龈下1 mm到龈上1 mm,2组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后1年,2组修复体边缘位于龈下2 mm到龈上1 mm,2组修复体边缘至邻面龈缘距离差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),诊断饰面组修复体边缘平龈的位点更多。术后2组修复体在外形准确性、边缘密合性方面均未出现C级,诊断饰面组A级比率均高于压膜组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),在表面光滑性方面均为A级。术后两组修复体PES评分,压膜组均较诊断饰面组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:诊断饰面手术导板的精确度较高,术后修复效果较压膜导板更稳定

关键词: 冠延长术, 导板

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effect of compression mold template and diagnose mock-up surgical template in the crown lengthening. Methods: Thirty patients who needed anterior crown lengthening were randomly divided into two groups. The compression mold group used compression mold guide template for 15 patients and 76 affected teeth, and the diagnose mock-up group used diagnostic mock-up surgical template for 15 patients and 80 affected teeth. 6 months and one year after surgery, the probing depth (PD), restoration margins to gingiva distance, the quality of restoration, and pink esthetic score (PES) were evaluated, and then statistical analysis. Results: The periodontal conditions of two groups were good after surgery, only one site PD of 5mm appeared on the adjacent surface of the compression mold group one year after surgery, and the remaining sites were less than 4mm. 6 months after surgery, two groups of restoration margins under 1 mm to 1 mm on the gingiva, differences between two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). After one year, two groups of restoration margins under 2 mm to 1 mm on the gingiva, restoration margins to gingiva adjacent surface distance difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were more sites at the gingival margin level in the diagnose mock-up group. After surgery, grade C was not found in the prosthesis shape accuracy and edge closeness, grade A ratio in the diagnose mock-up group was higher than that in the compression mold group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Grade A was found in the surface smoothness. After surgery, PES score of the compression mold group was lower than that of the diagnose mock-up group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The accuracy of the diagnose mock-up surgical template is relatively high, and the postoperative repair effect is more stable.

Key words: crown lengthening , surgical template