GALL线评价快速扩弓联合前方牵引治疗替牙期骨性Ⅲ类错牙合的疗效

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2020.05.015

口腔医学研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 465-468.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2020.05.015

GALL线评价快速扩弓联合前方牵引治疗替牙期骨性Ⅲ类错牙合的疗效

巴哈尔尼萨·热扎克, 李兆阳, 胡义春, 迪丽菲热·吐尔洪, 贾俊, 祖丽胡马尔·努尔艾合买提, 古力巴哈·买买提力^*

新疆医科大学新疆乌鲁木齐 830054

收稿日期:2019-06-12 出版日期:2020-06-16 发布日期:2020-06-18
通讯作者: ^* 古力巴哈·买买提力,E-mail:gulibaha_1972@163.com
作者简介:巴哈尔尼萨·热扎克(1992~ ),女,新疆人,硕士在读,研究方向:口腔正畸学。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(编号:81860194)

Evaluation the Treatment Effect of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Combined with Maxillary Protraction of Class Ⅲ Malocclusion by GALL Line

Bahaernisa·REZHAKE, LI Zhaoyang, HU Yichun, Dilifeire·TUERHONG, JIA Jun, Zhlihumaer·NUERAIHEMAITI, Gulibaha·MAIMAITILI^*

Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China

Received:2019-06-12 Online:2020-06-16 Published:2020-06-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:运用Andrews口颌面协调六要素中的GALL线,尝试对快速扩弓联合前方牵引矫治骨性Ⅲ类错牙合的疗效评价分析。方法:共选取25名扩弓前牵矫治结束的7~12岁骨性Ⅲ类错牙合患者(男12,女,13),以GAll线作为参考平面分析矫治前(T1)和治疗后(T2)的头颅侧位片,并以传统的评价指标为对照,评价矫治前后软硬组织的变化。结果:治疗结束后,患者均发生了明显的上颌骨前移,下颌骨后移.SNA、ANB、PP-FH、MP-FH、L1-MP、U1-SN、MP-FH、B-GALL 、Pog-GALL、 U1FA-GALL、U1-GALL、L1-GALL、LL-E、LL-GALL、Ns-Sn-Pos治疗前后的数值,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),SNB、Wits值、Y轴角治疗前后差值无统计学意义。结论:以GAll线为参考平面的测量指标的结果与传统评价指标大的结果基本一致,这种基于面部协调美学理论的评价方法能够有效直观的反映出错患者扩弓牵前矫治后的牙、颌、面关系的改善,较传统的评价测量方法更加直观及个性化。

关键词: 上颌前方牵引, 快速扩弓, Andrews口颌面协调六要素, GALL线

Abstract: Objective: To make an analysis on the appearance change after rapid maxillary expansion combined with maxillary protraction based on Andrews six elements of oralfacial harmony. Methods: A total of 25 patients with maxillary deficiency were collected. Before and after the treatments, cephalometric radiographs were measured using GAll line as a reference plane. The measuring results were compared with traditional evaluation index. Results: After treatment, all patients had obvious maxillary anterior displacement and mandibular posterior displacement. The differences of SNA, ANB, PP-FH, MP-FH, L1-MP, U1-SN, MP-FH, B-GALL, Pog-GALL, U1FA-GALL, U1-GALL, L1-GALL, LL-E, LL-GALL, and Ns-Sn-Pos before and after treatment were statistically significant. However, the differences of SNB, Wits, and Y axis were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The results of measurement indexes using GAll line as the reference plane were basically consistent with the results of traditional evaluation indexes. This evaluation method could effectively and intuitively reflect the improvement of the relationship among teeth, jaw, and face after the orthodontic treatment.

Key words: maxillary protraction, rapid maxillary expansion, Andrews six elements of oralfacial harmony, GALL line

巴哈尔尼萨·热扎克, 李兆阳, 胡义春, 迪丽菲热·吐尔洪, 贾俊, 祖丽胡马尔·努尔艾合买提, 古力巴哈·买买提力. GALL线评价快速扩弓联合前方牵引治疗替牙期骨性Ⅲ类错牙合的疗效[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(5): 465-468.

Bahaernisa·REZHAKE, LI Zhaoyang, HU Yichun, Dilifeire·TUERHONG, JIA Jun, Zhlihumaer·NUERAIHEMAITI, Gulibaha·MAIMAITILI. Evaluation the Treatment Effect of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Combined with Maxillary Protraction of Class Ⅲ Malocclusion by GALL Line[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(5): 465-468.

参考文献

[1] Xu Y, Zhu P, Le L, et al. Conservative treatment for a growing patient with a severe, developing skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion and open bite[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2014, 145(6):807-816.
[2] 熊再道, 柯杰, 赵桂芝. 上下联合扩弓结合前方牵引矫治骨性Ⅲ类错牙合软组织变化研究[J]. 中国美容医学, 2016, 25(7):78-81.
[3] 金苗,康卫明,乔珺,等. GTRV法评估快速扩弓联合前方牵引治疗替牙期骨性Ⅲ类错牙合疗效分析[J].中国美容医学, 2018,27(12):11-15.
[4] 赵清娟,杨燕方,吴秋瑾,等.面具式前方牵引矫治器治疗儿童骨性III类错牙合的疗效分析[J].中国美容医学杂志,2015, (2):46-50.
[5] Nienkemper M, Wilmes B, Franchi L, et al. Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination: a controlled clinical study[J].Angle Orthod, 2015, 85(5):764-770.
[6] Andrews LF. The six elements of orofacial harmony[J].Andrews J Orthod Orofac Harmony, 2000,1(1); 13-22.
[7] Andrews LF. Article 2: Six element diagnostic record[J]. Andrews J Orthod Orofac Harmony, 2001,2(1): 15-20.
[8] Yasutsugu M, Ryouhei N, Hiroyuki N, et al. Mandibulectomy for treatment of chondrosarcoma in a rabbit[J]. Journal of the Japan Veterinary Medical Association, 2007, 60(7):515-518.
[9] Takeshita N, Ishida M, Watanabe H, et al. Improvement of asymmetric stomatognathic functions, unilateral crossbite, and facial esthetics in a patient with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion and mandibular asymmetry, treated with orthognathic surgery[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2013, 144(3):441-454.
[10] 周彦恒. 安格尔Ⅲ类错牙合畸形的诊断和治疗[J]. 中华口腔正畸学杂志,2000,7(1):40-43.
[11] Utsuno H, Kageyama T, Uchida K, et al. Facial soft tissue thickness differences among three skeletal classes in Japanese population[J]. Forensic Sci Int,2014,236:175-180
[12] Choi JW, Lee JY, Oh TS, et al. Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg,2014, 42(3):220-226.
[13] Kim K, Choi SH, Choi EH, et al. Unpredictability of soft tissue changes after camouflage treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion with maximum anterior retraction using miniscrews[J]. Angle Orthod, 2017, 87(2):230-238.
[14] Tamaoki S, Ishikawa H, Hata S, et al. Occlusal and skeletal changes induced by protraction facemask combined with slow maxillary expansion[J]. J Hard Tissue Biol, 2017, 26(2): 141-148.
[15] Resnick CM, Kim S, Yorlets RR, et al.Evaluation of andrews analysis as a predictor of ideal sagittal maxillary positioning in orthognathic surgery[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2018, 76(10):2169-2176.
[16] Resnick CM, Daniels KM, Vlahos M. Does andrews facial analysis predict esthetic sagittal maxillary position[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2018, 125(4):376-381.
[17] Resnick CM, Calabrese CE, Resnick AS.Maxillary Sagittal position in relation to the forehead:a target for orthognathic surgery[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2018, 29(3):688-691.
[18] Andrews LF.The 6-elements orthodontic philosophy:Treatment goals, classification, and rules for treating[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2015, 148(6):883-887.

GALL线评价快速扩弓联合前方牵引治疗替牙期骨性Ⅲ类错牙合的疗效

Evaluation the Treatment Effect of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Combined with Maxillary Protraction of Class Ⅲ Malocclusion by GALL Line

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	任留阳, 熊晖. 上颌快速扩弓对安氏Ⅱ类1分类青少年患者上气道体积的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(8): 786-789.
[2]	任留阳, 王喜迎, 苏家筠, 胡瓦特·赛热克, 熊晖. 上颌快速扩弓对安氏Ⅱ类1分类患者颌面三维组织结构的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(5): 539-543.
[3]	许颖华, 江业强. 上颌快速扩弓矫治对牙髓血流量的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(4): 385-387.