不同材料修复对老年根面龋患者疗效及微渗漏的影响分析

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.09.007

口腔医学研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 800-804.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.09.007

不同材料修复对老年根面龋患者疗效及微渗漏的影响分析

兰静^1*, 罗加农¹, 李伟², 邹玲²

1.内江市第一人民医院口腔科四川内江 641000;
2.口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心四川大学华西口腔医院牙体牙髓病科四川成都 610041

收稿日期:2021-05-10 出版日期:2021-09-28 发布日期:2021-09-16
通讯作者: *兰静,E-mail:lanjingly@126.com
作者简介:兰静(1987~ ),女,四川资阳人,硕士,主治医师,主要从事口腔科常见病的临床及科研教学工作。
基金资助:
四川省科技厅重点研发项目(编号:2020YFSY0019)

Effect of Different Materials on Curative Effect and Microleakage of Elderly Patients with Root Caries

LAN Jing^1*, LUO Jianong¹, LI Wei², ZOU Ling²

1. Department of Stomatology, First People's Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang 641000, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Department of Cariology and Endodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China

Received:2021-05-10 Online:2021-09-28 Published:2021-09-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 比较不同材料修复对老年根面龋患者疗效及微渗漏的影响。方法: 选择2018年1月~2020年1月在我院就诊的114例老年根面龋患者进行研究。采用随机数字表法将患者分为2组,各57例。对照组采用光固化复合树脂修复,观察组玻璃离子水门汀修复。比较两组患者临床疗效、微渗漏、牙周指标及龈沟液中炎症因子水平。结果: 对照组治疗成功率为91.22%,与观察组的94.74%差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组微渗漏率为3.51%,低于对照组的8.94%(P<0.05)。修复前两组患者龈沟液量及龈沟探针深度差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后两组龈沟液量、龈沟探针深度均高于治疗前且对照组龈沟液量、龈沟探针深度均高于观察组(P<0.05)。修补前两组患者龈沟液中白细胞介素-1β、白细胞介素-6、基质金属蛋白酶-2水平差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),修补后两组白细胞介素-1β、白细胞介素-6、基质金属蛋白酶-2水平均明显升高且对照组白细胞介素-1β、白细胞介素-6、基质金属蛋白酶-2水平高于观察组(P<0.05)。结论: 玻璃离子水门汀修复与光固化复合树脂修复对老年根面龋患者治疗成功率相当,但玻璃离子水门汀修复微渗漏率更低且对患者的牙周指标及龈沟炎症因子影响更小。

关键词: 修复材料, 根面龋, 微渗漏

Abstract: Objective: To compare the effects of different repair materials on the curative effect and microleakage of elderly patients with root caries. Methods: One hundred and fourteen elderly patients with root caries who were treated in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were selected. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups with 57 cases each. The control group was repaired with light-curing composite resin, and the observation group was repaired with glass ionomer cement. The clinical efficacy, microleakage, periodontal indicators, and inflammatory factor levels in gingival crevicular fluid were compared. Results: The treatment success rate of the control group was 91.22%, which was not statistically different from the observation group's 94.74% (P>0.05). The observation group's microleakage rate was 3.51%, which was lower than the control group's 8.94% (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in GCF volume and GCF probe depth between two groups before repair (P>0.05). After treatment, the GCF volume and GCF probe depth of two groups were higher than those before treatment, and the GCF volume and GCF probe depth of control group were higher than those of observation group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and MMP-2 in gingival crevicular fluid between two groups before repair (P>0.05). After repair, the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and MMP-2 in the two groups were significantly increased, and the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and MMP-2 in the control group were higher than those in the observation group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Glass ionomer cement repair and light-curing composite resin repair have the same success rate in the treatment of elderly patients with root caries, but the glass ionomer cement repair has a lower rate of microleakage and has a smaller effect on the periodontal indicators and gingival sulcus inflammatory factors.

Key words: repair material, root caries, microleakage

兰静, 罗加农, 李伟, 邹玲. 不同材料修复对老年根面龋患者疗效及微渗漏的影响分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(9): 800-804.

LAN Jing, LUO Jianong, LI Wei, ZOU Ling. Effect of Different Materials on Curative Effect and Microleakage of Elderly Patients with Root Caries[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(9): 800-804.

参考文献

[1] 沈耀川,郑歆,叶燕惠,等.中国大陆老年人根面龋患龋率及流行病学特征的Meta分析[J].口腔医学研究,2019,35(3):301-306.
[2] Nazem D, Biclesanu CF, Paluta D, et al. Study of marginal microleakage in root caries restored with resin composites, giomers and glass ionomer cements [J]. Mater Plast, 2017, 54(4): 740.
[3] Ayatollahi F, Zarebidoki F, Razavi SH, et al. Comparison of microleakage of CEM Cement apical plug in different powder/liquid ratio in immature teeth using fluid filtration technique [J]. J Dent, 2019, 20(1): 37-42.
[4] 杨薇,王健平,刘鑫喆,等.氟纳米羟基磷灰石对早期根面龋再矿化效果的实验研究[J].口腔医学研究,2017,33(2):191-193.
[5] 陈爽,薛欣,金星爱,等. 牙本质表面处理对树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘接强度的影响[J].口腔疾病防治,2021,29(2):63-67.
[6] 吴补领,赵望泓.老年根面龋诊疗指南(讨论稿)[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志,2016,14(2):116-119.
[7] Ramezanali F, Aryanezhad S, Mohammadian F, et al. In vitro microleakage of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium-enriched mixture cement and biodentine intra-orifice barriers [J]. Iran Endod J, 2017, 12(2): 211-214.
[8] 杨明旭,鲁蓓.中国2010年分省死亡率与预期寿命——基于各省第六次人口普查资料[J].人口研究,2019,43(1):18-35.
[9] Demirel G, Gür G, Eryilmaz M, et al. The effects of self-etch bio-active dental adhesive systems on bacterial microleakage [J]. J Adhes Sci Technol, 2018, 32(10): 1044-1054.
[10] Turkistani A, Almutairi M, Banakhar N, et al. Optical evaluation of enamel microleakage with one-step self-etch adhesives [J]. Photomed Laser Surg, 2018, 36(11): 589-594.
[11] Al Tuwirqi AA, Alshammari AM, Felemban OM, et al. Comparison of penetration depth and microleakage of resin infiltrant and conventional sealant in pits and fissures of permanent teeth in vitro [J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2019, 20(11): 1339-1344.
[12] Lone MM, Khan FR. Evaluation of micro leakage of root canals filled with different obturation techniques: An in vitro study [J]. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 2018, 30(1): 34-39.
[13] Münevveroğlu AP, Ozsoy A, Ozcan M. Microleakage of high viscosity glass-ionomer and glass-carbomer with and without coating before and after hydrothermal aging [J]. Braz Dent Sci, 2019, 22(1): 79-87.
[14] Ghajghouj O, Taşar-Faruk S. Evaluation of fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns with different intracoronal depths and restorative materials luted with various resin cements [J]. Materials, 2019, 12(16): 2528-2531.
[15] Ertürk Avunduk AT, Balar S. Evaluation of microleakage in class Ⅴ cavities prepared by different caries removal methods [J]. Microsc Res Techniq, 2019, 82(9): 1566-1574.
[16] Rahawi OS, Ahmad MB, Ismail SA. Evaluation of apical microleakage of endodontically treated teeth sealed with three different root canal sealers [J]. Al-Rafidain Dent J, 2019, 19(1): 11-19.
[17] Çirakoğlu S, Baddal B, Îslam A. The effectiveness of laser-activated irrigation on the apical microleakage qualities of MTA repair HP and NeoMTA plus in simulated immature teeth: A comparative study [J]. Materials, 2020, 13(15): 3287-3290.
[18] Nematollahi H, Bagherian A, Ghazvini K, et al. Microbial microleakage assessment of class Ⅴ cavities restored with different materials and techniques: A laboratory study [J]. Dent Res J, 2017, 14(5): 344-349.
[19] Feiz A, Nazeri R, Karimi K, et al. The effects of surface treatments on root dentin analyzing microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts [J]. Ann Den Spec Vol, 2017, 5(4): 151.
[20] Shahraki HAE, Saberi EA, Maserrat V, et al. In vitro comparison of apical micro leakage in root canal prepared wave one and reciproc files [J]. J Biochem Tech, 2020, 11(2): 65-70.

不同材料修复对老年根面龋患者疗效及微渗漏的影响分析

Effect of Different Materials on Curative Effect and Microleakage of Elderly Patients with Root Caries

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	朱运握, 何万志. SonicFill声波树脂直接和间接法修复后牙Ⅱ类洞的微渗漏表现[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(8): 732-736.
[2]	张敏, 张晓洁, 郑苍尚, 朱耀旻. Er:YAG激光桩道荡洗技术对纤维桩微渗漏的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(8): 746-749.
[3]	李娜, 李祥伟. 根管系统封闭性的影响因素及其检测方法[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(3): 200-203.
[4]	王雯, 谢翠柳, 邓婷, 刘雯, 刘敏. 原花青素对纤维桩粘接耐久性的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(3): 216-220.
[5]	赵岩, 靳趁心. Micro CT评估光照模式对复合树脂微渗漏影响的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(3): 276-279.
[6]	赵爽, 刘玉艳. 老年人根面龋治疗方法现状[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(3): 230-233.
[7]	王新, 杜毅. 老年人根面龋的预防[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(3): 234-237.
[8]	张洁. 老年天然牙与三种口腔修复材料摩擦磨损学性能的实验研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(3): 254-257.
[9]	沈耀川, 郑歆, 叶燕惠, 陈昕. 中国大陆老年人根面龋患龋率及流行病学特征的Meta分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(3): 301-306.
[10]	张磊, 曹佩琳, 潘伊莎, 陈瑞甜, 邹佳沅, 赵小娥, 王正直, 陈智. 不同大块充填树脂对Ⅱ类洞龈壁密合性的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(3): 319-322.
[11]	魏玉华, 杨苗. 疲劳循环对复合树脂微渗漏影响的体外研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(6): 668-670.
[12]	邵丽娜, 韩雪, 仇丽鸿, 詹福良, 王雪梅. SonicFill系统对II类洞充填后微渗漏影响的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(4): 409-411.
[13]	杨玉慧，赵云鹏，向莹君. 深圳福田社区老年人根面龋干预模式研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(3): 328-330.
[14]	杨薇, 王健平, 刘鑫喆, 黄歆博, 李雪. 氟纳米羟基磷灰石对早期根面龋再矿化效果的实验研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(2): 191-193.
[15]	李欣霖,韩汉,谢金玲,吴佩玲. RMGIC联合自酸蚀粘接剂修复Ⅴ类洞粘接强度和边缘微渗漏的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(12): 1282-1285.