iRoot BP Plus乳磨牙活髓切断术3年疗效观察

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.07.018

口腔医学研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 669-672.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.07.018

iRoot BP Plus乳磨牙活髓切断术3年疗效观察

钟婉金, 李月梅, 陈婵婵, 常惠惠, 丁桂聪^*

深圳市儿童医院口腔科广东深圳 518034

收稿日期:2022-06-01 出版日期:2022-07-28 发布日期:2022-07-22
通讯作者: * 丁桂聪,E-mail:dgc_67@sina.com
作者简介:钟婉金(1983~ ),女,广东人,主治医师,硕士,主要从事领域为活髓保存的临床研究。

Three-year Outcome of iRoot BP Plus Pulpotomy in Primary Molars: A Retrospective Study

ZHONG Wanjin, LI Yuemei, CHEN Chanchan, CHANG Huihui, DING Guicong^*

Department of Stomatology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen 518034, China

Received:2022-06-01 Online:2022-07-28 Published:2022-07-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:通过电子病历数据库进行观察iRoot BP Plus用于乳磨牙活髓切断术3年疗效及分析其影响因素。方法:在深圳市儿童医院电子病历数据库,检索2018年1~12月口腔科因乳磨牙深龋行iRoot BP Plus活髓切断术的治疗记录,选择年龄7岁及以下患儿、随访时间不少于3年、病历资料完整的患牙为研究对象。根据AAPD临床及影像学评价标准,计算治疗成功率,并分析影响因素。结果:研究共纳入患牙58例,术后3年成功率87.93%(51/58),不同性别、年龄、牙位、牙列、止血时间及冠方修复方式对成功率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:iRoot BP Plus应用于乳磨牙活髓切断术3年随访期内取得较好的治疗效果,可广泛应用于临床。

关键词: 乳磨牙, 活髓切断术, 生物陶瓷

Abstract: Objective: To observe the three-year curative effect of iroot BP plus pulpotomy of primary molars and analyze the influencing factors. Methods: In the electronic medical record database of Shenzhen Children's Hospital, the treatment records of iroot BP plus pulpotomy for deep caries of primary molars in the Department of Stomatology from January to December 2018 were retrieved. The patients aged 7 years and below, with a follow-up period of not less than 3 years and complete medical records were collected, and the primary molars following pulpotomy with iroot BP plus for deep caries of the patients were selected as the research objects. According to AAPD clinical and imaging evaluation criteria, the treatment success rate was calculated and the influencing factors were analyzed. Results: Fifty-eight teeth were finally included. The 3-year success rate was 87.93% (51/58). There was no significant difference in the success rate among different gender, ages, tooth position, dentition, hemostasis time, and crown restoration method (P>0.05). Conclusion: iroot BP plus has good therapeutic effect in the 3-year follow-up period of pulpotomy of primary molars.

Key words: deciduous molars, pulpotomy, bioceramics

钟婉金, 李月梅, 陈婵婵, 常惠惠, 丁桂聪. iRoot BP Plus乳磨牙活髓切断术3年疗效观察[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(7): 669-672.

ZHONG Wanjin, LI Yuemei, CHEN Chanchan, CHANG Huihui, DING Guicong. Three-year Outcome of iRoot BP Plus Pulpotomy in Primary Molars: A Retrospective Study[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2022, 38(7): 669-672.

参考文献

[1] 冯希平.中国居民口腔健康状况——第四次中国口腔健康流行病学调查报告[C]//2018年中华口腔医学会第十八次口腔预防医学学术年会论文汇编,2018.
[2] Dogan S, Duruturk L, Orhan AI,et al. Determining treatibility of primary teeth with pulpal exposure [J]. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2013, 37(4): 345-350.
[3] Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth [J]. Pediatr Dent, 2018, 40(6): 343-351.
[4] 郑佳佳,张笋,葛立宏.我国乳牙牙髓切断术临床应用现况调查[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2014,28(5):296-299.
[5] Carti O, Oznurhan F. Evaluation and comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine in primary tooth pulpotomy: Clinical and radiographic study [J]. Niger J Clin Pract, 2017, 20(12): 1604-1609.
[6] El Meligy O, Alamoudi NM, Allazzam SM,et al. Biodentine^TM versus formocresol pulpotomy technique in primary molars: a 12-month randomized controlled clinical trial [J]. BMC Oral Health, 2019, 19(1): 3.
[7] Celik BN, Mutluay MS, Arikan V,et al. The evaluation of MTA and Biodentine as a pulpotomy materials for carious exposures in primary teeth [J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2019, 23(2): 661-666.
[8] Asgary S, Shirvani A, Fazlyab M. MTA and ferric sulfate in pulpotomy outcomes of primary molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2014, 39(1): 1-8.
[9] Shirvani A, Asgary S. Mineral trioxide aggregate versus formocresol pulpotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials [J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2014, 18(4): 1023-1030.
[10] Godhi B, Tyagi R. Success rate of MTA pulpotomy on vital pulp of primary molars: A 3-year observational study [J]. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2016, 9(3): 222-227.
[11] Elkhadem A, Nagi P. Effectiveness of MTA pulpotomy in primary molars: a critical assessment of relevant studies [J]. Evid Based Dent, 2013, 14(2): 46.
[12] 麦丽嘉,袁国华.乳牙盖髓剂MTA与新型生物材料Biodentine的比较[J].口腔医学研究,2021,37(1): 19-22.
[13] 董艳梅.活髓保存治疗与生物活性盖髓剂的临床现状与研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2014,49(05): 268-271.
[14] 刘思毅,宫玮玉,刘木清,等.成熟恒牙因龋露髓行生物陶瓷材料直接盖髓术的临床疗效观察[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2020,55(12):945-951.
[15] 王爽,刘鹤,赵双云,等.两种生物陶瓷材料用于乳磨牙牙髓切断术的随机对照研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2021,56(2):145-151.
[16] Dhar V, Marghalani AA, Crystal YO, et al. Use of vital pulp therapies in primary teeth with deep caries lesions [J]. Pediatr Dent, 2017, 39(5):146-159.
[17] Hutcheson C, Seale NS, Mcwhorter A, et al. Multi-surface composite vs stainless steel crown restorations after mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Pediatr Dent, 2012, 34(7): 460-467.
[18] 窦桂丽,吴南,赵双云,等.乳磨牙牙髓切断术两年疗效观察及其影响因素回顾性分析[J].北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(1): 170-175.
[19] Nasrallah H, El Noueiri B, Pilipili C, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluations of biodentine pulpotomies in mature primary molars (stage 2) [J]. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2018, 11(6): 496-504.
[20] Maroto M, Barbería E, Vera V, et al. Mineral trioxide aggregate as pulp dressing agent in pulpotomy treatment of primary molars: 42-month clinical study [J]. Am J Dent, 2007, 20(5): 283-286.
[21] Cardoso-Silva C, Barbería E, Maroto M, et al. Clinical study of mineral trioxide aggregate in primary molars. Comparison between grey and white MTA-a long term follow-up (84 months) [J]. J Dent, 2011, 39(2): 187-193.

iRoot BP Plus乳磨牙活髓切断术3年疗效观察

Three-year Outcome of iRoot BP Plus Pulpotomy in Primary Molars: A Retrospective Study

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张玲玲, 吕长海. Sonic Fill树脂在乳磨牙修复中的应用及研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(7): 613-615.
[2]	蔡长宇, 冯娜, 杨玉娥. 垫底材料及厚度对下颌第二乳磨牙嵌体修复应力分布影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(7): 654-658.
[3]	陈义, 吴燕岷. 微孔生物陶瓷支架在骨组织工程中的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(1): 17-19.
[4]	田青鹭, 王艳. 生物陶瓷材料在根尖屏障术中的应用进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(3): 191-194.
[5]	何林, 何淞, 吴稀, 杨森. 人根尖乳头干细胞在羟基磷灰石和聚多巴胺-羟基磷灰石上的粘附、增殖及成骨分化[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(6): 523-527.
[6]	张利娟, 姜明, 李姗姗, 李帆, 张颖, 谭凯璇, 卢洁, 杨芳. 乳磨牙根尖周炎伴牙源性上颌窦炎及眶下间隙感染1例[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(1): 87-88.
[7]	马晓伟. 机用镍钛器械用于乳磨牙根管治疗临床效果评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(9): 1016-1018.
[8]	任慧迪, 章惠娅, 邹静, 张琼. 全身麻醉下乳磨牙深龋MTA冠髓切断术2年疗效观察[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(4): 359-362.
[9]	刘瑶, 王玲, 杨维虹, 韩林秀, 刘兴容. Hall技术治疗乳磨牙龋坏疗效的系统评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(10): 1076-1080.
[10]	李文敏. 自酸蚀粘接剂在乳磨牙窝沟封闭中的应用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(7): 757-759.