根管封闭剂iRoot SP和AH Plus与牙本质粘接强度的体外研究

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.10.007

口腔医学研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 936-940.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.10.007

根管封闭剂iRoot SP和AH Plus与牙本质粘接强度的体外研究

任颖超, 孔祥红, 何苗苗, 张梦雅, 肖燕^*

郑州大学第一附属医院口腔医学中心河南郑州 450000

收稿日期:2022-04-13 出版日期:2022-10-28 发布日期:2022-10-20
通讯作者: *肖燕,E-mail:xiaoyan@zzu.edu.cn
作者简介:任颖超(1995~ )女,河南郑州人,硕士在读,主要从事牙体牙髓疾病的基础及临床研究。
基金资助:
河南省科技攻关项目(编号:192102310079)

In Vitro Study of Root Canal Sealers iRoot SP and AH Plus on Adhesive Properties of Dentin

REN Yingchao, KONG Xianghong, HE Miaomiao, ZHANG Mengya, XIAO Yan^*

Department of Stomatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China

Received:2022-04-13 Online:2022-10-28 Published:2022-10-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 研究iRoot SP和AH Plus对根管内壁牙本质粘接强度的影响。方法: 收集单根管牙60颗,随机分成iRoot SP和AH plus组(n=30),每组又随机分为3个小组并分别采用热牙胶法、单尖法、冷侧压法进行根管充填,1周后,将所有样本切成厚度1.00 mm的薄片,通过万能试验机计算推出强度,并用SPSS 22.0进行统计学分析,同时观察断裂方式并计算百分比。结果: iRoot SP和AH plus整体的粘接强度数值相近,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);iRoot SP结合单尖法根尖区粘接强度最高(8.38±3.91) MPa,差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。各分组断裂方式占比大小均为:混合断裂＞内聚断裂＞界面断裂。结论: iRoot SP结合3种技术充填时均能达到相近甚至优于AH plus的粘接强度,以单尖法的根尖区粘接强度最高。断裂方式以混合断裂为主。

关键词: iRoot SP, AH Plus, 粘接强度, 根管充填技术

Abstract: Objective: To study the effect of iRoot SP and AH Plus on the bonding strength of root inner canal wall. Methods: Sixty single tube teeth were collected and randomly divided into iRoot SP and AH plus (n=30). Each group was randomly divided into 3 subgroups and filled by warm vertical technique, the single cone technique, and lateral condensation technique. After 1 week, all samples were cut into slices with 1 mm in thickness. The strength was calculated by universal test machine, and the fracture mode and the percentage were calculated. Results: iRoot SP and AH plus were similar and the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The highest value (8.38±3.91) MPa was in the apical region of iRoot SP (P<0.05). The proportion of fracture mode in each group was: mixed failure>cohesin failure>adhesion failure. Conclusion: iRoot SP can be similar or even better than AH plus, and the apical region has the highest bonding strength by the single cone method. The fracture mode is dominated by mixed failure.

Key words: iRoot SP, AH Plus, bond strength, filling technology

任颖超, 孔祥红, 何苗苗, 张梦雅, 肖燕. 根管封闭剂iRoot SP和AH Plus与牙本质粘接强度的体外研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(10): 936-940.

REN Yingchao, KONG Xianghong, HE Miaomiao, ZHANG Mengya, XIAO Yan. In Vitro Study of Root Canal Sealers iRoot SP and AH Plus on Adhesive Properties of Dentin[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2022, 38(10): 936-940.

参考文献

[1] 辛锐,杨健.XP-endo系列镍钛锉的研究进展[J].口腔医学研究,2019,36(6):521-523.
[2] Viapiana R, Guerreiro-Tanomaru J, Tanomaru-Filho M, et al. Interface of dentine to root canal sealers[J]. J Dent, 2014, 42(3):336-350.
[3] Rahimi S, Shahi S, Nezafati S, et al. In vitro comparison of three different lengths of remaining gutta-percha for establishment of apical seal after post space preparation[J]. J Oral Sci, 2008, 50(4):435-439.
[4] Qu W, Bai W, Liang YH, et al. Influence of warm vertical compaction technique on physical properties of root canal sealers[J]. J Endod, 2016, 42(12):1829-1833.
[5] Baras BH, Melo MAS, Thumbigere-Math V, et al. Novel bioactive and therapeutic root canal sealers with antibacterial and remineralization properties[J]. Mater, 2020, 13(5):1096.
[6] Jeong JW, DeGraft A, Dorn SO, et al. Dentinal tubule penetration of a calcium silicate-based root canal sealer with different obturation methods[J]. J Endod, 2017, 43(4):633-637.
[7] DeLong C, He J, Woodmansey KM. The effect of obturation technique on the push out bond strength of calcium silicate sealers[J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(3):385-388.
[8] Al-Hiyasat AS, Alfirjani SA. The effect of obturation techniques on the push-out bond strength of a premixed bioceramic root canal sealer[J]. J Dent, 2019, 89:103169.
[9] Tanomaru M, Bier CAS, Tanomaru JMG, et al. Evaluation of the thermoplasticity of different gutta-percha cones and the TC system[J]. J App Oral Sci, 2007, 15(2):131-134.
[10] Celikten B, Uzuntas CF, Orhan AI, et al. Micro-CT assessment of the sealing ability of three root canal filling techniques[J]. J Oral Sci, 2015, 57(4):361-366.
[11] Wu D, Tang Z, Zhang G, et al. The sealing ability of a new silicone-based root canal filling material (Gutta-Flow): an in vitro study using the percentage of gutta-percha filled area[J]. Dent Mater J, 2011, 30(5):569-575.
[12] 徐海,仇晓慧,张光东,等.应用micro-CT评价不同封闭术的根管充填质量[J].上海口腔医学,2018,27(4):349-353.
[13] Trope M, Bunes A, Debelian G. Root filling materials and techniques: bioceramics a new hope[J]. Endod Topics, 2015, 32(1):86-96.
[14] Gambarini G, Tagger M. Sealing ability of a new hydroxy apatite-containing endodontic sealer using lateral condensation and thermatic compaction of gutta-percha,in vitro[J]. J Endod, 1996, 22(4):165-167.
[15] Keles A, Alcin H, Kamalak A, et al. Micro-CT evaluation of root filling quality in oval-shaped canals[J]. Int Endod J, 2014, 47(12):1177-1184.
[16] Gade VJ, Belsare LD, Patil S, et al. Evaluation of push out bond strength of endosequence BC sealer with lateral condensation and thermoplasticized technique: an in vitro study[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2015, 18(2):124-127.
[17] Qu W, Bai W, Liang YH, et al. Influence of warm vertical compaction technique on physical properties of root canal sealers[J]. J Endod, 2016, 42(12):1829-1833.
[18] Atmeh AR, AlShwaimi E. The effect of heating time and temperature on epoxy resin and calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers[J]. J Endod, 2018, 43(12):2112-2118.
[19] Fisher MA, Berzins DW, Bahcall JK. An in vitro comparison of bond strength of various obturation materials to root canal dentin using a push out test design[J]. J Endod, 2007, 33(7):856-858.
[20] Celikten B, Uzuntas CF, Orhan AI, et al. Evaluation of root canal sealer filling quality using a single-cone technique in oval shaped canals:An in vitro micro-CT study[J]. Scanning, 2016, 38(2):133-140.
[21] Pereira RD, Brito M, Leoni GB, et al. Evaluation of bond strength in single cone fillings of canal with different cross sections[J]. Int Endod J, 2017, 50(2):177-183.
[22] Ersahan S, Aydin C. Dislocation resistance of iRoot SP, a calcium silicate-based sealer, from radicular dentine[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(12):2000-2002.

根管封闭剂iRoot SP和AH Plus与牙本质粘接强度的体外研究

In Vitro Study of Root Canal Sealers iRoot SP and AH Plus on Adhesive Properties of Dentin

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	宋逸婷, 朱莉, 徐一迪, 刘思文, 林婷婷, 黄盛斌, 林继兴, 麻健丰. 飞秒激光诱导氧化锆陶瓷微结构及对其粘结性能的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(3): 261-267.
[2]	王静, 孙亚丽, 殷金萍, 范丽瑶, 孟伟涛. iRoot SP单尖充填后即刻与延迟桩道预备对根尖封闭性能的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(1): 56-59.
[3]	牟文博, 程瑶, 董波. 苯扎氯铵改性粘接剂对牙本质-树脂远期粘接强度的影响研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(4): 344-348.
[4]	王璐瑶, 沈帅, 牛玉梅, 潘爽. NaClO溶液的浓度和作用时间对树脂牙本质粘结界面的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(2): 126-130.
[5]	朱轩言, 朱松. 提高通用粘接剂与牙本质粘接性能的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(10): 883-885.
[6]	刘小雪, 李艳萍, 何丽娜, 李季, 戴鑫睿, 牛玉梅. 不同粘接系统联合硅烷偶联剂对陈旧性复合树脂粘接效果的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(10): 936-939.
[7]	高楠, 韦羽和, 姜潇, 路炜. 染色和遮色处理对氧化锆与树脂粘接性能的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(6): 595-598.
[8]	王雯, 谢翠柳, 邓婷, 刘雯, 刘敏. 原花青素对纤维桩粘接耐久性的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(3): 216-220.
[9]	邓婷, 刘敏, 刘雯, 王雯, 谢翠柳. EDTA和EDC预处理对两步法自酸蚀粘接剂粘接强度的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(3): 221-225.
[10]	李秀花, 于鹏, 田福聪, 王晓燕. 磷酸预处理对两步法自酸蚀粘接剂与牙釉质粘接强度的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(8): 748-751.
[11]	尹路, 郑燕芬. 预备与不预备前牙超薄瓷贴面断裂模式的比较研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(4): 382-385.
[12]	冯靓婧, 于皓, 程辉. 烧结次数对不同方法染色的氧化锆陶瓷粘接性能的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(2): 172-175.
[13]	卢冠凡,冯琨,苏征,纪海. Nd:YAG根管荡洗技术对纤维桩粘接效果的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(12): 1320-1323.
[14]	吴於芝, 林居红. iRoot SP牙本质小管渗透性的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(4): 436-439.
[15]	李欣霖,韩汉,谢金玲,吴佩玲. RMGIC联合自酸蚀粘接剂修复Ⅴ类洞粘接强度和边缘微渗漏的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(12): 1282-1285.