口腔医学研究

口腔医学研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 1206-1208.

• 临床研究论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

3M流动树脂与3M玻璃离子修复乳磨牙Ⅱ类洞的临床疗效比较

谢妮娜1,2,宋文婷1,魏路明1,刘宗响2*   

  1. 1. 徐州医学院口腔医学院儿童牙病科 江苏 徐州 221004;
    2. 徐州医学院附属徐州口腔医院 江苏 徐州 221004
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-28 出版日期:2015-12-28 发布日期:2016-03-21
  • 通讯作者: 刘宗响,E-mail:408571191@qq.com
  • 作者简介:谢妮娜(1983~),女,湖北人,硕士,主治医师,主要从事儿童口腔医学的教学、临床及科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省高校自然科学基金资助项目(编号:10KJB320026)

Clinical Comparison of 3M Flowable Resin and 3M Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Molars ClassⅡ Cavity.

XIE Ni-na1,2, SONG Wen-ting1, WEI Lu-ming1, LIU Zong-xiang2.   

  1. 1. Xu Zhou Medical College, Xuzhou 221004, China;
    2. Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College, Xuzhou 221004, China
  • Received:2015-04-28 Online:2015-12-28 Published:2016-03-21

PDF (PC)

390

被引次数

3

摘要： 目的:探索儿童口腔科2种常用充填材料用于乳磨牙邻牙合面龋洞(Ⅱ类洞)充填治疗的临床疗效。方法:将178名4~6岁儿童266颗乳磨牙Ⅱ类洞随机分为2组,即3M流动树脂组(实验A组)、3M玻璃离子组(对照B组),对乳磨牙进行充填治疗后1、2年复查比较2种材料治疗的临床疗效。结果:采用3M流动树脂和3M玻璃离子对Ⅱ类洞进行充填治疗后1年成功率分别为96.00%和87.80%,充填治疗后2年成功率分别为95.76%和86.61%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:3M流动树脂用于乳磨牙邻牙合面龋洞充填治疗的临床效果优于3M玻璃离子。

关键词: 3M流动树脂, 3M玻璃离子, Ⅱ类洞

Abstract: Objective: To explore the clinical effect of dental filling materials commonly used in pediatric dentistry on the restoration of mesial or distal occlusal surface cavities (class Ⅱ cavity) in primary molars. Methods: 266 primary molars with class Ⅱ cavities among 178 children aged 4-6 were randomly divided into two groups, namely, the 3M flowable resin group (experimental group) and 3M glass ionomer group (matched group). The clinical effect of two materials was compared after 1 and 2 years of treatment. Results: Treatment success rates of 3M flowable composite resin and 3M glass ionomer for class Ⅱ cavities were 96.00% and 87.80% respectively after 1 year. After 2 years, the rates were 95.76% and 86.61% respectively (P<0.05). Conclusions: For class Ⅱ cavity in primary molars, the clinical outcome of 3M flowable composite resin is better than that of 3M glass ionomer.

中图分类号: