口腔医学研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 746-750.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2016.07.020

• 临床研究论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

骨性支抗III类颌间牵引体系的临床研究

艾毅龙, 吴斯媛, 王增全*   

  1. 佛山市口腔医院正畸科 广东 佛山 528000
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-09 出版日期:2016-07-26 发布日期:2016-07-25
  • 通讯作者: 王增全,E-mail:420064165@qq.com
  • 作者简介:艾毅龙(1976~ ),男,江西人,学士,主治医师,主 要从事口腔正畸临床与科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    佛山市医学类科技攻关项目(编号:2014AB00389);佛山市科技创新专项资金(编号:2015AG10015)

Clinical Study on Skeletal Anchorage Class III Intermaxillary Elastic Distraction System.

AI Yi-long, WU Si-yuan, WANG Zeng-quan   

  1. Department of Orthodontics, Foshan Stomatology Hospital.Foshan 528000, China.
  • Received:2016-03-09 Online:2016-07-26 Published:2016-07-25

摘要: 目的: 研究骨性支抗Ⅲ类颌间牵引体系对骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形患者硬组织及颞下颌关节结构的影响。方法: 选取40例生长发育期骨性Ⅲ类错牙合患者,向患者提供治疗方案后按照患者意愿进入实验组及对照组。实验组进行快速扩弓后在患者双侧颧牙槽嵴植入微型种植钉,种植钉与快速扩弓器紧密结扎形成刚性结构,下颌粘结全牙弓式夹板,进行口内全天Ⅲ类颌间牵引,力值为150 g/侧,对照组快速扩弓后戴用传统前牵引面罩,力值为500g/侧,患者平均治疗时间为9个月。在治疗前后通过头影测量分析比较患者硬组织变化情况,CBCT检查分析颞下颌关节情况。结果: 实验组Ⅲ类错牙合均得到改善,侧貌由凹面型变为直面型,前牙覆牙合覆盖正常。上下前牙轴倾度无明显变化,上颌骨向前生长,A点前移,SNA、ANB增大;SNB无明显变化;下颌角增大下颌骨顺时针旋转。颞下颌关节形态结构良好,颞下颌关节前上后内外间隙均未见改变。与对照组相比,上颌骨基本保持平动,上切牙未像对照组出现明显唇倾,但下切牙出现较明显的舌倾。结论: 骨性支抗III类颌间牵引体系可促进鼻--上颌骨复合体生长且未对颞下颌关节造成不良影响。

关键词: Ⅲ类错牙合畸形, 前牵引, 颌间牵引

Abstract: Objective: To study the effect of skeletal anchorage class III intermaxillary elastic distraction system on hard tissue and temporomandibular joint structure of skeletal Class III malocclusions patients. Methods: Forty skeletal class III malocclusion patients who needed protraction treatment were recruited for the study. Patients were assigned into experimental group and control group in accordance with their choice after explain the treatment plan. In the experimental group, after rapid maxillary expansion, implants were inserted to bilateral zygomatic ridge and tightly ligated with rapid maxillary expansion to form a rigid structure. A splint was bonded in mandibular arch for 24 hours and class III intermaxillary elastic (3.5OZ/side) distraction was performed between implant and splint. In the control group, after rapid maxillary expansion, traditional protraction facemask was used with 500g/side. The average course of treatment was 9 months. Cephalometric analysis before and after treatment was used to evaluate the changes of hard tissues of patients. CBCT examination before and after treatment was used to analyze the change of temporomandibular joint. Results: Class III malocclusion was improved in all patients. Profile changed from concave to straight. Anterior teeth became normal overbite and overjet. Upper and lower anterior teeth axis inclination had no obvious change, maxillary growth forward, point A moved forward; SNA and ANB increased; SNB had no obvious change; mandibular angle increased with clockwise rotation. The morphological structure of the temporomandibular joint was good. And the anterior, superior, posterior, lateral and medial temporomandibular joint spaces had no change before and after treatment. Compared with the control group, maxilla of the experiment group had no rotation and upper incisors had no obvious labial inclination, but lower incisors appeared obvious lingual



基金项目 佛山市医学类科技攻关项目(编号:2014AB00389)
佛山市科技创新专项资金(编号:2015AG10015)
作者简介 艾毅龙(1976~ ),男,江西人,学士,主治医师,主 要从事口腔正畸临床与科研工作。
*通讯作者 王增全,E-mail:420064165@qq.com
tipping. Conclusion: Skeletal anchorage class III intermaxillary elastic distraction system can improve the growth of nasomaxillary complex and had no adverse effect on the temporomandibular joint.

Key words: Skeletal class III malocclusion , Protraction, Intermaxillary elastic

中图分类号: