口腔医学研究

口腔医学研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 957-960.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2016.09.016

• 临床研究论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同年龄重度婴幼儿龋治疗时机选择分析

陆洋1*,刘爱宾2,袁铮1,郑梦雅1   

  1. 1. 唐山市协和医院儿童牙病科 河北 唐山 063000;
    2. 唐山市协和医院牙体牙髓病科 河北 唐山 063000
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-01 出版日期:2016-09-26 发布日期:2016-09-26
  • 通讯作者: 陆洋,电话:18032553905
  • 作者简介:陆洋(1979~ ),男,河北省唐山市人,学士,主治医师,主要从事儿童牙病的临床治疗工作。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省2016年度医学科学研究重点课题(编号:20160882)

Analysis on the Timing of Treatment for Heavy Caries in Children with Different Ages

LU Yang1, LIU Ai-bing2, YUAN Zheng1, ZHENG Meng-ya1   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Tangshan Union Medical College Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China;
    2. Department of Endodontics, Tangshan Union Medical College Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China
  • Received:2016-02-01 Online:2016-09-26 Published:2016-09-26

PDF (PC)

322

摘要： 目的:探讨急性、非急性期就诊对不同年龄幼儿牙科焦虑的影响,完善针对焦虑儿童的行为管理。方法:选取3～7岁初次就诊,乳磨牙龋坏儿童192人。每年龄组48人,分别分为实验组、对照组。实验组为急性期就诊患儿,对照组为非急性期患儿。CFSS-DS量表评估患儿治疗前、后及复诊畏惧程度;Venham量表评估初、复诊就诊行为变化。数据进行统计学分析。结果:全年龄段实验组患儿治疗前后CFSS-DS量表评分差值比较,有统计学意义(P＜0.05),对照组无统计学意义。全年龄段实验组患儿初、复诊就诊行为Venham量表评分差值比较,有统计学意义(P＜0.05);对照组无统计学意义。结论:恰当治疗可稳定或改善患儿牙科焦虑,随年龄增长急性期就诊患儿焦虑程度改善更显著。

关键词: 儿童牙科畏惧症, 婴幼儿龋, 急性期, 非急性期

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effects of treatment at acute or non-acute period on the dental anxiety in children with different ages, and to improve the behavior management of children with dental anxiety. Methods: One hundred and ninety-two children aged 3-7 years with primary molars caries were divided averagely into 4 groups, 2 experimental groups (with acute symptom) and 2 control groups (with non-acute symptom) on their first visiting. The change of the children fear was assessed before the first treatment, after the first treatment, and subsequent visit by CFSS-DS. The change of children's clinical behavior was evaluated in their first and return visit by Venham Clinical Anxiety and Cooperation Behavior Measurement Scale. Results: Before and after the treatment, the CFSS-DS average scores of the experimental group were statistical significance (P<0.05), which was not statistical different from the control group. On their first and return visit, the behavior of the experimental group was statistical different (P<0.05) by Venham Clinical Anxiety and Cooperation Behavior Measurement Scale, however, there was not statistical difference in the control group. Conclusion: Children dental anxiety could be stabilized and improved by proper treatment, and the improvement of the patients who took treatment during the acute stage was more remarkable.

Key words: Child dental fear, Childhood caries, Acute phase, Non-acute phase

中图分类号: