ProTaper、WaveOne与ProTaperNext成形弯曲根管能力的比较

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.10.005

口腔医学研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 1048-1051.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.10.005

ProTaper、WaveOne与ProTaperNext成形弯曲根管能力的比较

刘元元^1,2, 刘生波^1,2*

1. 武汉大学口腔医学院口腔基础医学省部共建国家重点实验室培训基地和口腔生物医学教育部重点实验室湖北武汉 430079;
2. 武汉大学口腔医院牙体牙髓一科湖北武汉 430079

收稿日期:2017-11-16 出版日期:2018-10-28 发布日期:2018-10-24
通讯作者: 刘生波,电话:027-87686208
作者简介:刘元元(1989~ ),女,河南新乡人,硕士在读,主要从事牙体牙髓病学的临床工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(编号:81102228)

A Review of Shaping Ability of Curved Root Canals between ProTaper,WaveOne, and ProTaperNext.

LIU Yuan-yuan^1,2, LIU Sheng-bo^1,2*.

1. The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology and Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;
2. Department of Endodontics, Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China.

Received:2017-11-16 Online:2018-10-28 Published:2018-10-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： ProTaper是目前使用较为广泛的镍钛器械之一,但由于质硬及高折断率,限制了其在弯曲根管内的应用。为了改善器械分离,登士柏公司推出了新一代的镍钛系统WaveOne与ProTaperNext。本文从设计特点、机械性能和预备弯曲根管成形能力对ProTaper、WaveOne与ProTaperNext作一综述。

关键词: ProTaper, WaveOne, ProTaperNext, 弯曲根管, 根管预备

Abstract: ProTaper is one of the widest used nickel-titanium instruments. However, because of stiffness and high broken rate, its application in clinical has been limited. Recently, Dentsply has pushed out two different NITIs, i.e. WaveOne and ProTaperNext, which aims to reduce the high broken rate. This review summarizes the design features, mechanical properties, and shaping ability of curved canals.

Key words: ProTaper, WaveOne, ProTaperNext, Curved canal, Root canal preparation

刘元元, 刘生波. ProTaper、WaveOne与ProTaperNext成形弯曲根管能力的比较[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(10): 1048-1051.

LIU Yuan-yuan, LIU Sheng-bo.. A Review of Shaping Ability of Curved Root Canals between ProTaper,WaveOne, and ProTaperNext.[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2018, 34(10): 1048-1051.

参考文献

[1] Delai D, Boijink D, Hoppe CB, et al. Apically extruded debris in filling removal of curved canals using 3 NiTi systems and hand files [J]. Braz Dent J, 2018, 29(1)∶54-59
[2] Ertas H, Capar ID. An in vitro analysis of separation of multi-use ProTaper Universal and ProTaper next instruments in extracted mandibular molar teeth [J]. Scanning, 2015, 37(4)∶270-276
[3] Grande NM, Ahmed HM, Cohen S, et al. Current assessment of reciprocation in endodontic preparation: a comprehensive review—part I: historic perspectives and current applications [J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(11)∶1778-1783
[4] Uygun AD, Kol E, Topcu MKC, et al. Variations in cyclic fatigue resistance among ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal instruments at different levels [J]. Int Endod J, 2016, 5(49)∶494-499
[5] Kaval ME, Capar ID, Ertas H. Evaluation of the cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of novel nickel-titanium rotary files with various alloy properties [J]. J Endod, 2016, 42(12)∶1840-1843
[6] Pirani C, Ruggeri O, Cirulli PP, et al. Metallurgical analysis and fatigue resistance of WaveOne and ProTaper nickel-titanium instruments [J]. Odontology, 2014, 102(2)∶211-216
[7] Patiño PV, Biedma BM, Nogueira JR, et al. Fracture rate of nickel-titanium instruments using continuous versus alternating rotation [J]. Endod Prac Today, 2008, 2(3)∶193-197
[8] Webber J, Machtou P, Pertot W, et al. The WaveOne single-file reciprocating system [J]. Roots, 2011, 1(1)∶28-33
[9] 王天,李桂红. M-Wire镍钛根管预备器械研究进展[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2017,31(3)∶162-164
[10] Shim KS, Oh S, Kum K, et al. Mechanical and metallurgical properties of various nickel-titanium rotary instruments [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2017, 2017∶4528601
[11] 占云燕,杨国斌.ProTaperNext锉和WaveOne锉根管成形能力的对比研究[J].口腔医学研究,2016,32(9)∶925-928
[12] Wu H, Peng C, Bai Y, et al. Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals [J]. BMC Oral Health, 2015, 15(1): 27
[13] Ye J, Gao Y. Metallurgical characterization of M-wire nickel-titanium shape memory alloy used for endodontic rotary instruments during low-cycle fatigue [J]. J Endod, 2012, 38(1)∶105-107
[14] Kfir A, Elkes D, Pawar A, et al. Incidence of microcracks in maxillary first premolars after instrumentation with three different mechanized file systems: a comparative ex vivo study [J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2017, 21(1)∶405-411
[15] Yoo YS, Cho YB. A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating NiTi instruments in simulated curved canals [J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2012, 37(4)∶220-227
[16] Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Paolino DS, et al. Canal shaping with WaveOne primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system: a comparative study [J]. J Endod,2012,38(4)∶505-509
[17] Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, et al. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper [J]. Int Endod J, 2012, 45(5)∶449-461
[18] Kim HC, Hwang YJ, Jung DW, et al. Micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy comparisons of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments used with reciprocating motion [J]. Scanning, 2013, 35(2)∶112-118
[19] Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, et al. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals [J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(6)∶852-856
[20] Dhingra A, Gupt R, Singh A. Comparison of centric ability of Protaper Next, WaveOne & Protaper using cone beam computed tomography [J]. Endodontology, 2014, 26(2)∶109-112
[21] Mcray B, Cox TC, Cohenca N, et al. A micro-computed tomography-based comparison of the canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal rotary and WaveOne reciprocating files [J]. Quintessence Int, 2014, 45(2)∶101-108
[22] 鲁杰,于淼,仪虹,等. 机用单根锉WaveOne与ProTaper镍钛器械对重度弯曲根管的预备及评价[J].中国医刊,2015,50(1)∶58-60
[23] Agarwal RS, Agarwal J, Jain P, et al. Comparative analysis of canal centering ability of different single file systems using cone beam computed tomography-an in-vitro study [J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2015, 9(5)∶zc06-zc10
[24] Barbosa-Ribeiro M, Albergaria SJ, Malvar MDFG, et al. Canal transportation and centering ability of curved root canals prepared using rotary and reciprocating systems [J]. Braz J Oral Sci, 2015, 14(3)∶214-218
[25] Gagliardi J, Versiani MA, de Sousa-Neto MD, et al. Evaluation of the shaping characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Universal in curved canals [J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(10)∶1718-1724
[26] Hoppe CB, Böttcher DE, Justo AM, et al. Comparison of curved root canals preparation using reciprocating, continuous and an association of motions [J]. Scanning, 2016, 38(5)∶462-468
[27] Mamede-Neto I, Borges ÁH, Alencar AHG, et al. Multidimensional analysis of curved root canal preparation using continuous or reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments [J]. Open Dent J, 2018, 12(1)∶32-45
[28] Li SH, Lu Y, Song D, et al. Occurrence of dentinal microcracks in severely curved root canals with ProTaper Universal, WaveOne, and ProTaper Next file systems [J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(11)∶1875-1879

ProTaper、WaveOne与ProTaperNext成形弯曲根管能力的比较

A Review of Shaping Ability of Curved Root Canals between ProTaper,WaveOne, and ProTaperNext.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	辛悦,杨健. XP-endo系列镍钛锉的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(6): 521-523.
[2]	江波, 黄静. 不同镍钛器械在弯曲根管预备中的比较[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(4): 331-334.
[3]	夏智敏, 吴昌哲, 彭彬. 3种镍钛器械预备弯曲根管产生垂直向压力的比较[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(10): 975-978.
[4]	韩怡, 付宏宇, 侯晓玫. 大锥度通畅通道在模拟弯曲根管中对ProTaper Next成形能力的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(1): 89-93.
[5]	王天, 李桂红. ProTaper Next和M3在模拟弯曲根管内成形效果的实验研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(4): 444-448.
[6]	于小青，刘宇飞，郭世博，冯瑞明，朱梦莹，薛明. 5种机用镍钛锉预备根管成形能力的比较研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(3): 286-289.
[7]	熊梦琳, 徐江, 马琰, 马俊玥, 高文辉, 吴佩玲. 镍钛器械在3种不同运动模式下预备根管后根尖孔表面形态变化[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(2): 183-186.
[8]	白雨豪, 侯晓玫, 苏征. 不同方法对弯曲根管内氢氧化钙清除效果的锥形束CT研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(11): 1193-1196.
[9]	尹艳娇, 葛翘诚, 丁欣欣, 吴佩玲. Qmix、MTAD与EDTA去除根管玷污层的实验观察[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(11): 1197-1200.
[10]	占云燕,杨国斌. ProTaperNext锉和WaveOne锉根管成形能力的对比研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(9): 925-928.
[11]	杜池,罗晓冰, 张复兰, 洪飞. 两种镍钛机动器械应用于磨牙根管治疗术一次法的近期疗效[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(12): 1316-1318.
[12]	刘宗响, 刘艺, 段君兰, 王鹏来, 陈红莲. 不同镍钛旋转器械平解剖性根尖孔长度预备根管后根尖孔表面形态变化的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(5): 485-489.
[13]	苗晖,郭香君,陈敏,吴丽更. 根尖预备尺寸对玷污层清除效果的比较研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(2): 160-162.
[14]	李宗莉,徐冬冬综述,彭彬审校. 新型镍钛器械Hyflex CM的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(12): 1267-1269.