潜入式种植修复10年回顾性研究

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.02.016

口腔医学研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 168-171.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.02.016

潜入式种植修复10年回顾性研究

贺平¹,冯瑜¹,李冀寅¹,吴晓乐¹,陈小冬^2*

1. 大连市口腔医院口腔外科辽宁大连 116021;
2. 大连市口腔医院修复科辽宁大连 116021

收稿日期:2018-07-21 出版日期:2019-02-18 发布日期:2019-02-25
通讯作者: 陈小冬,E-mail:dlkqcxd@sohu.com
作者简介:贺平(1964~ ),男,大连人,主任医师,研究方向:口腔种植外科。

Retrospective Study of Submerged Implant Restoration after Ten Years

HE Ping¹, FENG Yu^1#, LI Ji-yin¹, WU Xiao-le¹, CHEN Xiao-dong^2*

1. Department of Oral Surgery, Dalian Stomatological Hospital. Dalian 116021, China;
2. Department of Prosthodontics, Dalian Stomatological Hospital, Dalian 116021, China.

Received:2018-07-21 Online:2019-02-18 Published:2019-02-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 通过对潜入式种植修复病例进行回顾性研究,评估潜入式种植修复的临床效果和种植体存留率,总结口腔种植中各种骨增量技术的远期临床效果及并发症的发生原因。方法: 收集2005年1月~2008年1月于我院种植科进行潜入式种植修复病例,按纳入和排除标准,共纳入893例患者1776枚种植体。对于未来院复诊的患者电话回访或邮寄X线片进行调查研究。结果: 467例患者865枚种植体通过门诊复诊或电话回访完成调查,占种植体总数的48.70%。根据Wheeler种植体存留率的标准,本组种植体10年存留率为96.65%。结论: 潜入式种植修复10年后临床复查患者整体满意度较高,10年存留率达96.65%。

关键词: 潜入式种植, 回顾性研究, 存留率

Abstract: Objective : To evaluate the clinical effect and implant retention rate of submerged implant restoration, and to analyze and summarize the long-term clinical effects of various bone augmentation techniques and the reasons of the complications of the implant by retrospectively studying the submerged implantation cases. Methods: From January 2005 to January 2008, the Department of Implantology in our hospital was selected to study the submerged implants. According to the exclusion criteria, a total of 1776 implants were included in 893 patients. For patients who could not come to hospital, a telephone interview or X-ray film was sent for investigation. Results: A total of 865 implants in 467 patients were investigated through outpatient visits or telephone interviews, accounting for 48.7% of the total implants. According to the Wheeler implant retention rate standard, the retention rate for these implants was 96.65% for ten years. Conclusion: The overall satisfaction degree of submerged implant restorations after 10 years by clinical re-examination is high, with a retention rate of 96.65%.

Key words: Submerged implantation, Retrospective study, Retention rate

贺平,冯瑜,李冀寅,吴晓乐,陈小冬. 潜入式种植修复10年回顾性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(2): 168-171.

HE Ping, FENG Yu, LI Ji-yin, WU Xiao-le, CHEN Xiao-dong. Retrospective Study of Submerged Implant Restoration after Ten Years[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2019, 35(2): 168-171.

参考文献

[1] 宿玉成.现代口腔种植学.见:宿玉成主编.现代口腔种植学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.4-5.
[2] Choi BH, Li J, Kim HS, et al. Comparison of submerged and nonsubmerged implants placed without flap reflection in the canine mandible [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008, 105(5):561-565.
[3] Weber HP, Buser D, Donath K, et al. Comparison of healed tissues adjacent to submerged and non-submerged unloaded titanium dental implants. A histometric study in beagle dogs [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1996, 7(1):11-19.
[4] Ericsson I ,Nilner K, Klinge B.Radiographical and histological characteristics of ssubmerged and nonsubmerged titanium implants. An experimental study in the Labrador dog [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1996, 7(1):20-26.
[5] 钱玙,王琼,张凤鸣.88例种植体临床疗效观察及失败病例分析[J].当代医学,2013, 19(14):34-36.
[6] Wheeler SL, Holmes RE, Calhoun CJ. Six-year clinical and histologic study of sinus-lift grafts[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1996, 11(1):26-34.
[7] Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1986, 1(1):11-25.
[8] 林野,李健慧,丘立新,等.口腔种植修复临床效果十年回顾研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2006,41( 3) :131-135.
[9] Kim DM, Badovinac RL, Lorenz RL, et al. A 10-year prospective clinical andradiographic study of one-stage dental implants [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(3):254-258.
[10] Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, et al. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. I: Clinical and radiographic results [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2010, 18(6):699-706.
[11] 郭平川,孟学梅,刘春年,等.口腔种植修复临床效果五年回顾研究[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2007,12(4):167-171.
[12] Kim YK, Park JY, Kim SG, et al. Prognosis of the implants replaced after removal of failed dental implants [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2010, 110(3):281-286.
[13] Stone JL, Beaupre GS, Hayes WC. Multiaxial strength characteristics of trabecular bone [J]. J Biomech, 1983, 16(9):743-752.
[14] Draenert FG, Huetzen D, Neff A,et al. Vertical bone augmentation procedures: basics and techniques in dental implantology [J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2014, 102(5):1605-1613.
[15] 庄秀妹,朱呈小露,邓飞龙,等.Osstell ISQTM监测种植体稳定性的临床研究[J].中国口腔种植学杂志, 2013,18(3):133-134.
[16] Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, et al. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (Ⅱ). Etiopathogenesis [J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 1998, 106(3):721-764.
[17] 王丽君,杨小东,章德农,等.种植修复十年以上病例的回顾性研究[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2014,19(3):127-130.

潜入式种植修复10年回顾性研究

Retrospective Study of Submerged Implant Restoration after Ten Years

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	胡常琦, 魏振宇, 魏洪武, 夏勋, 黄江琴, 龚金梅, 郭水根. 短种植体(≤6 mm)在萎缩后牙区5~7年疗效的回顾性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(1): 58-62.
[2]	李庆福, 李锡清, 姜丽, 马欣. 化疗诱发口腔黏膜炎的危险因素分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(8): 810-813.
[3]	帕孜来提·肖克来提,李伟东,庄芳璐,阿地力·莫明. 伊犁地区446例颌面部创伤患者临床分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(6): 587-590.
[4]	王丽萍, 郭雪琪, 董豫, 陈希立, 陈伟鸿, 葛林虎. Trausim种植体用于牙列缺损的短期临床疗效观察[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(6): 675-678.