新型机用不锈钢锉Gentlefile根管成形能力的体外研究

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.08.011

口腔医学研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (8): 722-726.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.08.011

新型机用不锈钢锉Gentlefile根管成形能力的体外研究

陈细雄, 葛久禹^*

南京大学医学院附属口腔医院牙体牙髓科江苏南京 210023

出版日期:2021-08-28 发布日期:2021-08-11
通讯作者: 葛久禹,E-mail:JYGe@nju.edu.cn
作者简介:陈细雄(1994~ ),男,浙江温州人,硕士,住院医师,研究方向:牙体牙髓病学的临床及基础研究。
基金资助:
国家临床重点专科建设项目[卫生部卫办医政函(2011)873号]江苏省自然科学基金面上项目(编号:BK2012522)

Shaping Ability of New Stainless-steel Files in Simulated Canals: in Vitro Study

CHEN Xixiong, GE Jiuyu^*

Department of Endodontics, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China

Online:2021-08-28 Published:2021-08-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 比较一种独特的机用不锈钢旋转系统——Gentlefile(GF)和Protaper(PT)在J形模拟根管中的成形能力。方法: 将33个带有J形模拟根管的树脂块根据尖端直径分成3组,分别将其预备至GF Red(#23)、PT F2(#25)、GF Blue(#26)。使用牙科手术显微镜以及相关软件采集并处理预备前后图像。比较根管偏移量及中心比,同时记录根管台阶和器械分离情况。使用扫描电镜观察预备前后器械的表面变化。结果: 本次实验共发生了2例GF器械分离。相比于PT F2, GF系统在根尖和根中段表现出更强的定心能力和更少的根管偏移。而GF Red和GF Blue间均无显著差异。扫描电镜结果显示预备后GF器械在根尖段发生不同程度地损坏,而PT器械未发现明显异常。结论: 在本研究条件下,GF器械表现出更好的抗偏移能力,但也易发生器械磨损甚至分离,建议一次性使用。

关键词: Gentlefile, Protaper, 根管预备, 根管成形

Abstract: Objective: To compare the shaping ability of Gentlefile (GF), an unique stainless-steel (SS) rotary system, and Protaper (PT), a popular mechanical nickel-titanium (NiTi) system, in J-shaped simulated canals. Methods: Thirty-three resin blocks with a J-shaped canal were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups according to tip diameters: Group 1, GF red (#23); Group 2, PT F2 (#25); and Group 3, GF blue (#26). Specimens were photographed and processed by dental operating microscope and software before and after preparation. The centering ability and canal transportation in different dimensions were calculated. Canal aberration and instrument separation were also recorded. The changes of the instruments were observed by scanning electron microscope. Results: Two cases of instrument separation of GF were noted. The GF system was significantly more centered and less transported than PT F2 in the apical and middle section. There was no difference between two GF instruments. Scanning electron microscope showed that GF instruments were damaged in apical segment, but PT instruments has similar surface morphology compared with the new file. Conclusion: GF showed better anti transportation ability. However, it is recommended to use the new file only once for its probability to be damaged.

Key words: Gentlefile, Protaper, root canal preparation, root canal shaping

陈细雄, 葛久禹. 新型机用不锈钢锉Gentlefile根管成形能力的体外研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(8): 722-726.

CHEN Xixiong, GE Jiuyu. Shaping Ability of New Stainless-steel Files in Simulated Canals: in Vitro Study[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(8): 722-726.

参考文献

[1] 江波,黄静.不同镍钛器械在弯曲根管预备中的比较[J].口腔医学研究,2019,35(4): 331-334.
[2] 葛久禹.镍钛根管预备器械[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2014,7(1): 2-9.
[3] 葛久禹.Step by Step:一步一步教你根管治疗(图谱)[M]. 江苏:江苏凤凰科学技术出版社,2019:151-152.
[4] BÜrklein S, Poschmann T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability of different nickel-titanium systems in simulated S-shaped canals with and without glide path [J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(8):1231-1234.
[5] Moreinos D, Dakar A, Stone NJ, et al. Evaluation of time to fracture and vertical forces applied by a novel gentlefile system for root canal preparation in simulated root canals [J]. J Endod, 2016, 42(3): 505-508.
[6] Htun PH, Ebihara A, Maki K, et al. Cleaning and shaping ability of gentlefile, hyFlex EDM, and protaper next instruments: A combined micro-computed tomographic and scanning electron microscopic study [J]. J Endod, 2020, 46(7): 973-979.
[7] Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review [J]. J Endod, 2004, 30(8):559-567.
[8] Razcha C, Zacharopoulos A, Anestis D, et al. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation and centering ability of 4 heat-treated nickel-titanium systems [J]. J Endod, 2020, 46(5):675-681.
[9] Augusto CM, Barbosa AFA, Guimarães CC, et al. A laboratory study of the impact of ultraconservative access cavities and minimal root canal tapers on the ability to shape canals in extracted mandibular molars and their fracture resistance [J]. Int Endod J, 2020, 53(11):1516-1529.
[10] Plotino G, ÖzyÜrek T, Grande NM, et al. Influence of size and taper of basic root canal preparation on root canal cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopy study [J]. Int Endod J, 2019, 52(3):343-351.
[11] Alattar S, Nehme W, Diemer F, et al. The influence of brushing motion on the cutting behavior of 3 reciprocating files in oval-shaped canals [J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(5):703-709.

[1]	苏雪龙, 刘飞, 贺舒阳, 郭青玉. 单支锉ProTaper Sx预备乳牙根管根尖推出物量的体外研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(5): 436-441.
[2]	于江利, 谭瑶, 侯晓玫, 韩怡. 机用镍钛通畅锉用于S形根管成形能力的体外研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(8): 781-785.
[3]	辛悦,杨健. XP-endo系列镍钛锉的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(6): 521-523.
[4]	江波, 黄静. 不同镍钛器械在弯曲根管预备中的比较[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(4): 331-334.
[5]	韩怡, 付宏宇, 侯晓玫. 大锥度通畅通道在模拟弯曲根管中对ProTaper Next成形能力的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(1): 89-93.
[6]	刘元元, 刘生波. ProTaper、WaveOne与ProTaperNext成形弯曲根管能力的比较[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(10): 1048-1051.
[7]	王天, 李桂红. ProTaper Next和M3在模拟弯曲根管内成形效果的实验研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(4): 444-448.
[8]	于小青，刘宇飞，郭世博，冯瑞明，朱梦莹，薛明. 5种机用镍钛锉预备根管成形能力的比较研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(3): 286-289.
[9]	熊梦琳, 徐江, 马琰, 马俊玥, 高文辉, 吴佩玲. 镍钛器械在3种不同运动模式下预备根管后根尖孔表面形态变化[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(2): 183-186.
[10]	尹艳娇, 葛翘诚, 丁欣欣, 吴佩玲. Qmix、MTAD与EDTA去除根管玷污层的实验观察[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(11): 1197-1200.
[11]	占云燕,杨国斌. ProTaperNext锉和WaveOne锉根管成形能力的对比研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(9): 925-928.
[12]	杜池,罗晓冰, 张复兰, 洪飞. 两种镍钛机动器械应用于磨牙根管治疗术一次法的近期疗效[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(12): 1316-1318.
[13]	刘宗响, 刘艺, 段君兰, 王鹏来, 陈红莲. 不同镍钛旋转器械平解剖性根尖孔长度预备根管后根尖孔表面形态变化的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(5): 485-489.
[14]	苗晖,郭香君,陈敏,吴丽更. 根尖预备尺寸对玷污层清除效果的比较研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(2): 160-162.
[15]	李宗莉,徐冬冬综述,彭彬审校. 新型镍钛器械Hyflex CM的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(12): 1267-1269.

新型机用不锈钢锉Gentlefile根管成形能力的体外研究

Shaping Ability of New Stainless-steel Files in Simulated Canals: in Vitro Study

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics