蝶鞍与颈椎成熟度的相关性研究

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.04.015

口腔医学研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 367-371.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.04.015

蝶鞍与颈椎成熟度的相关性研究

李亚其¹, 王梓千¹, 刘家琦¹, 肖楚翘¹, 颜哲彬¹, 熊鑫¹, 刘映鸿^2*

1.口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心四川大学华西口腔医院正畸科四川成都 610041;
2.四川大学华西口腔医院锦江门诊部四川成都 610066

收稿日期:2021-12-03 出版日期:2022-04-28 发布日期:2022-04-22
通讯作者: *刘映鸿,E-mail: cherryliuyh@aliyun.com
作者简介:李亚其(2000~),男,广西人,学士,研究方向:口腔正畸学。
基金资助:
四川大学大学生创新创业训练计划(编号:20221219L)

Study on Correlation between Sella Turcica and Cervical Vertebral Maturation

LI Yaqi¹, WANG Ziqian¹, LIU Jiaqi¹, XIAO Chuqiao¹, YAN Zhebin¹, XIONG Xin¹, LIU Yinghong^2*

1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Department of Orthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;
2. Jin Jiang Outpatient Department, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610066, China

Received:2021-12-03 Online:2022-04-28 Published:2022-04-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 评估不同颈椎成熟度患者的蝶鞍形态及大小差异。方法: 选取2020年1月~2021年10月就诊于四川大学华西口腔医院正畸科339例患者的头颅侧位片,其中男166例,女173例。依据颈椎成熟度将患者分为3组:组Ⅰ(青春期前);组Ⅱ(青春期);组Ⅲ(青春期后);利用Uceph头测软件对蝶鞍的长度、深度和直径进行测量;对蝶鞍的形态进行判定;运用SPSS 21.0软件对所得数据进行统计学分析。结果: 组Ⅲ的蝶鞍线性测量值大于组Ⅱ,组Ⅱ的蝶鞍线性测量值大于组Ⅰ(P<0.01);正常蝶鞍在组Ⅰ中更常见(P<0.05),组Ⅲ患者鞍桥发生率更高(P<0.01);不同性别患者蝶鞍的线性大小和形态均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论: 随着颈椎发育的成熟,蝶鞍的线性大小随之增加;鞍桥的发生可能与颈椎成熟度有关。

关键词: 头颅侧位片, 蝶鞍, 颈椎成熟度, 生长发育

Abstract: Objective: To measure the size and describe the morphology of sella turcica in patients with different cervical vertebral maturation (CVM). Methods: The subjects comprised 166 males and 173 females from Department of Orthodontics, West China Stomatology Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2020 to October 2021. According to CVM, they were divided into three groups: group Ⅰ (prepubertal), group Ⅱ (circumpubertal), and group Ⅲ (postpubertal). The Uceph cephalometric software was used to calculate the length, depth, and diameter of the sella turcica. In addition, the shape of the sella turcica was described as normal or with aberrations. Results: The linear measured value of sella turcica in group Ⅲ was higher than that in group Ⅱ, and that in group Ⅱ was higher than that in group Ⅰ (P<0.01). Normal sella was more common in group Ⅰ (P<0.05), and sella bridge occurred more frequently in group Ⅲ (P<0.01). There was no significant difference in linear size and shape of sella turcica between different genders (P>0.05). Conclusion: With the development and maturity of cervical vertebral, the linear size of sella turcica also increases. The occurrence of sella bridge may relate to cervical vertebral maturation.

Key words: lateral cephalogram, sella turcica, cervical vertebral maturation, growth and development

李亚其, 王梓千, 刘家琦, 肖楚翘, 颜哲彬, 熊鑫, 刘映鸿. 蝶鞍与颈椎成熟度的相关性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(4): 367-371.

LI Yaqi, WANG Ziqian, LIU Jiaqi, XIAO Chuqiao, YAN Zhebin, XIONG Xin, LIU Yinghong. Study on Correlation between Sella Turcica and Cervical Vertebral Maturation[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2022, 38(4): 367-371.

参考文献

[1] 刘军,杨洁,李铎,等.第二前磨牙先天缺失与蝶鞍的相关性研究[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2019,12(2):92-95.
[2] 程芸芸,邓爽,马新芳,等.新疆地区不同骨面型人群蝶鞍与年龄相关性的初步研究[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2019,33(6):345-348.
[3] Jankowski T, Jedliski M, Schmeidl K, et al. Sella turcica abnormalities, dental age and dental abnormalities in polish children[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(19):10101.
[4] Sobieska E, Fester A, Nieborak M, et al. Assessment of the dental age of children in the polish population with comparison of the demirjian and the willems methods[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2018, 24: 8315-8321.
[5] Korayem M, Alkofide E. Size and shape of the sella turcica in subjects with down syndrome[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2015, 18(1):43-50.
[6] Jankowski T, Jedliski M, Grocholewicz K, et al. Sella turcica morphology on cephalometric radiographs and dental abnormalities-is there any association?-systematic review[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(9): 4456.
[7] Mcnamara JA, Franchi L. The cervical vertebral maturation method: A user's guide[J]. Angle Orthod, 2018, 88(2): 133-143.
[8] Silverman FN. Roentgen standards fo-size of the pituitary fossa from infancy through adolescence[J]. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med, 1957, 78(3): 451-460.
[9] Axelsson S, Storhaug K, Kjaer I. Post-natal size and morphology of the sella turcica. Longitudinal cephalometric standards for Norwegians between 6 and 21 years of age[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2004, 26(6):597-604.
[10] Leonardi R, Barbato E, Vichi M, et al. A sella turcica bridge in subjects with dental anomalies[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2006, 28(6):580-585.
[11] Suri S, Prasad C, Tompson B, et al. Longitudinal comparison of skeletal age determined by the Greulich and Pyle method and chronologic age in normally growing children, and clinical interpretations for orthodontics[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2013, 143(1):50-60.
[12] Franchi L, Baccetti T, Toffol DL, et al. Phases of the dentition for the assessment of skeletal maturity: a diagnostic performance study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008, 133(3):395-400.
[13] Beit P, Peltomäki T, Schätzle M, et al. Evaluating the agreement of skeletal age assessment based on hand-wrist and cervical vertebrae radiography[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2013, 144(6):838-847.
[14] Angelieri F, Franchi L, Cevidanes LH, et al. Diagnostic performance of skeletal maturity for the assessment of midpalatal suture maturation[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2015, 148(6): 1010-1016.
[15] Shrestha GK, Pokharel PR, Gyawali R, et al. The morphology and bridging of the sella turcica in adult orthodontic patients[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2018, 18(1): 45.
[16] Muhammed FK, Abdullah AO, Liu Y. A morphometric study of the sella turcica: race, age, and gender effect[J]. Folia Morphol (Warsz), 2020, 79(2): 318-326.
[17] Çullu N, Yeniçeri I, Kilinç RM, et al. The shapes and normal dimensions of the sella turcica[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2021, 32(2): 749-751.
[18] Muhammed FK, Abdullah AO, Liu Y. Morphology, incidence of bridging, dimensions of sella turcica, and cephalometric standards in three different racial groups[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2019, 30(7): 2076-2081.
[19] Chaitanya B, Pai KM, Chhaparwal Y. Evaluation of the effect of age, gender, and skeletal class on the dimensions of sella turcica using lateral cephalogram[J]. Contemp Clin Dent, 2018, 9(2): 195-199.
[20] Gargi V, Prakash SM, Nagaraju K, et al. Radiological analysis of the sella turcica and its correlations with body mass index in a North Indian population[J]. Oral Radiol, 2019, 35(2):184-188.
[21] Sobuti F, Dadgar S, Seifi A, et al. Relationship between bridging and dimensions of sella turcica with classification of craniofacial skeleton[J]. Pol J Radiol, 2018, 83: e120-e126.
[22] Valizadeh S, Shahbeig S, Mohseni S, et al. Correlation of shape and size of sella turcica with the type of facial skeletal class in an Iranian group[J]. Iran J Radiol, 2015, 12(3): 16059.
[23] Buyuk SK, Karaman A, Yasa Y. Relationship between sella turcica bridging and cephalometric parameters in adolescents and young adults[J]. Oral Radiol, 2019, 35(3): 245-250.
[24] Scribante A, Sfondrini MF, Cassani M, et al. Sella turcica bridging and dental anomalies: is there an association?[J]. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2017, 27(6): 568-573.
[25] Gibelli D, Cellina M, Gibelli S, et al. Sella turcica bridging and ossified carotico-clinoid ligament: Correlation with sex and age[J]. Neuroradiol J, 2018, 31(3): 299-304.
[26] Dadgar S, Alimohamadi M, Rajabi N, et al. Associations among palatal impaction of canine, sella turcica bridging, and ponticulus posticus (atlas arcuate foramen)[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2021, 43(1): 93-99.
[27] Arcos-Palomino I, Ustrell-Torrent JM. Association between sella turcica bridging and altered direction of dental eruption: A case-control study[J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2019, 11(10): 913-920.
[28] Alqahtani H. Association between sella turcica bridging and congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors[J]. J Dent Sci, 2020, 15(1): 59-64.

蝶鞍与颈椎成熟度的相关性研究

Study on Correlation between Sella Turcica and Cervical Vertebral Maturation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	郑德鑫, 罗丹, 满城, 江海涛, 程娇, 高思继. 下颌升支后缘上移重建下颌髁突对下颌骨生长发育影响的实验研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(1): 60-63.
[2]	刘静, 肖丹娜, 张淋坤, 高辉. 生长发育期骨性Ⅲ类高低角骨面型颌骨垂直向变化比较[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(7): 780-783.
[3]	孟怡彤, 张晓东. CBCT转化的二维平片与头颅侧位片对上气道二维测量的比较研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(10): 1117-1121.
[4]	朱玉, 康启超, 阎秀林. 上颌埋伏尖牙引起切牙牙根吸收的预测[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(7): 777-781.
[5]	陈澜月，赵阳，郑博文，陈艳娜，安娜，刘奕. 腭侧埋伏阻生尖牙与鞍桥的相关性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(3): 295-297.
[6]	杨晓丰,刘奕. 不同程度深覆牙合患者颈椎异常的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(11): 1171-1175.
[7]	林焱,陈婉璐,张端强. 深覆牙合与正常牙合人群舌姿势位特征的比较研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(8): 804-.
[8]	林焱, 林永玲, 许潾于. 牙尖交错位与舌姿势位的舌位特征比较研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(4): 377-380.