Hall技术治疗乳磨牙龋的临床疗效观察

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2024.05.012

口腔医学研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 443-447.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2024.05.012

Hall技术治疗乳磨牙龋的临床疗效观察

于路¹, 李亚男², 邰琳琳¹, 孙晓玲¹, 刘美艳^3*

1.滨州医学院附属烟台口腔医院烟大分院山东烟台 264000;
2.滨州医学院附属烟台口腔医院口腔预防科山东烟台 264000;
3.滨州医学院附属烟台口腔医院开发区分院山东烟台 264000

收稿日期:2023-12-12 出版日期:2024-05-28 发布日期:2024-05-22
通讯作者: * 刘美艳,E-mail:liumeiyan198340@163.com
作者简介:于路(1978~ ),男,山东荣成人,副主任医师,学士,主要从事儿童口腔医学的研究。

Clinical Efficacy of Carious Primary Molars Treated with Hall Technique

YU Lu¹, LI Yanan², TAI Linlin¹, SUN Xiaoling¹, LIU Meiyan^3*

1. Branch in Yantai University Area,The Affiliated Yantai Stomatological Hospital, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264000, China;
2. Department of Preventive Dentistry, The Affiliated Yantai Stomatological Hospital, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264000, China;
3. Branch in Development Area, The Affiliated Yantai Stomatological Hospital, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264000, China

Received:2023-12-12 Online:2024-05-28 Published:2024-05-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:通过队列研究观察用Hall技术治疗乳磨牙龋的临床疗效,探讨影响成功率的因素。方法:选择2020年3月至2022年6月就诊的乳磨牙龋患者31例(31颗患牙),用Hall技术治疗。术后12~39个月复查,通过颞下颌关节和治疗牙有无症状、临床检查和根尖X线片进行疗效评价。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析统计成功率,Log-Rank检验分析不同因素对成功率的影响。结果:30例患者[年龄(4.9±1.5)岁(3.3~8.2岁),男21例,女9例]接受了12个月以上复查,总体成功率是93.3%;术后1年和2年的累积生存概率是96.7%和92.3%。年龄、牙位、洞形和ICDAS冠部龋影像学检查编码等因素对成功率均无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论:用Hall技术治疗乳磨牙龋可获得良好疗效,年龄、牙位、洞形和龋坏深度等因素不影响成功率。

关键词: Hall技术, 乳磨牙, 龋

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Hall Technique for managing carious primary molars and discuss the influence factors correlate to the success rate through a cohort study. Methods: From March 2020 to June 2022, 31 patients (31 teeth) with carious primary molar were selected. All the molars were treated with the Hall Technique. The patients were re-examined 12 to 39 months after operation and the outcomes were evaluated by symptoms of TMJ and teeth, clinical examination, and periapical radiograph. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate the success rate, and influence factors correlated to the success rate were analyzed by Log-Rank test. Results: Totally thirty patients [average (4.9±1.5) years old from 3.3 to 8.2 years old,21 males and 9 females] received the follow-up examination more than 12 months. The overall success rate was 93.3% and the cumulative probability of survival at 1 year and 2 years were 96.7% and 92.3%. Age, tooth position, cavity shape, and ICDAS coronal caries lesion radiographic score had no significant correlations with the success rate (P＞0.05). Conclusion: The Hall Technique was effective in treating carious primary molars. Age, tooth position, cavity shape, and the depth of caries had no significant correlations with the success rate.

Key words: Hall technique, primary molars, caries

于路, 李亚男, 邰琳琳, 孙晓玲, 刘美艳. Hall技术治疗乳磨牙龋的临床疗效观察[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2024, 40(5): 443-447.

YU Lu, LI Yanan, TAI Linlin, SUN Xiaoling, LIU Meiyan. Clinical Efficacy of Carious Primary Molars Treated with Hall Technique[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2024, 40(5): 443-447.

参考文献

[1] 王兴.第四次全国口腔健康流行病学调查报告[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018. 39.
[2] Du MQ, Li Zh, Jiang H, et al. Dental caries status and its associated factors among 3- to 5-year-old children in China: A national survey [J]. Chin J Dent Res, 2018, 21(3):167-179.
[3] 葛立宏.儿童口腔医学[M].第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2020. 92.
[4] Fayle SA. UK national clinical guidelines in paediatric dentistry [J]. Int J Paediatr Dent, 1999, 9(4):311-314.
[5] 中华口腔医学会儿童口腔医学专业委员会.乳牙金属预成冠修复的临床操作规范[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2020,55(8): 551-554.
[6] 刘芸,郝高峰,张强,等.深圳市3~5岁儿童乳磨牙金属预成冠应用情况调查分析[J].中国美容医学,2022,31(11):142-145.
[7] Innes NP, Dafydd JE, Stirrups DR. The hall technique; a randomized controlled clinical trial of a novel method of managing carious primary molars in general dental practice: acceptability of the technique and outcomes at 23 months [J]. BMC Oral Health, 2007, 7:18.
[8] Threlfall AG, Pilkington L, Milsom KM, et al. General dental practitioners' views on the use of stainless steel crowns to restore primary molars [J]. Br Dent J, 2005, 199(7):453-455.
[9] Innes NP, Stirrups DR, Evans DJ, et al. A novel technique using preformed metal crowns for managing carious primary molars in general practice-A retrospective analysis [J]. Br Dent J, 2006, 200(8):451-454.
[10] Ludwig KH, Fontana M, Vinson LA, et al. The success of stainless steel crowns placed with the Hall technique: A retrospective study [J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2014, 145(12):1248-1253.
[11] Elamin F, Abdelazeem N, Salah I, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing Hall vs conventional technique in placing preformed metal crowns from Sudan [J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(6):e0217740.
[12] Ayedun OS, Oredugba FA, Sote EO. Comparison of the treatment outcomes of the conventional stainless steel crown restorations and the Hall technique in the treatment of carious primary molars [J]. Niger J Clin Pr, 2021, 24(4):584-594.
[13] 王梦琪,王丽萍,盛丽,等.Hall技术治疗乳磨牙龋病效果的系统评价[J].口腔医学,2022,42(1):62-67.
[14] Hu S, BaniHani A, Nevitt S, et al. Hall technique for primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Jpn Dent Sci Rev, 2022, 58: 286-297.
[15] 高诗祺,于斯涵,周媛,等.Hall技术在乳磨牙龋齿治疗中的应用[J].中国医药导报,2021,18(29):49-51.
[16] 陈智,陈瑞甜.龋病再认识[J].口腔医学研究,2020,36(1):1-6.
[17] 杰弗里·A·迪安.麦克唐纳-埃弗里儿童青少年口腔医学(第10版)[M].秦满,译.第10版.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2018.5.
[18] Ohrbach R, ed. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders:assessment instruments [EB/OL]. https://ubwp.buffalo.edu/rdc-tmdinternational/wp-content/uploads/sites/58/2017/01/DC-TMD_SQ_shortform_2013-05-12.pdf,2013-05-12/2023-12-12.
[19] Innes NP, Evans DJ, Stewart M, et al. The hall technique guide V4 [EB/OL].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284189516_The_Hall_Technique_Guide_V4, 2015-11-20/2023-12-12.
[20] Santamaria RM, Innes NP, Machiulskiene V, et al. Alternative caries management options for primary molars: 2.5-year outcomes of a randomised clinical trial [J]. Caries Res, 2017, 51(6):605-614.
[21] Boyd DH, Page LF, Thomson WM .The hall technique and conventional restorative treatment in New Zealand children's primary oral health care-clinical outcomes at two years [J]. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2018, 28(2):180-188.
[22] 陈智,卢展民,Falk Schwendicke,等.龋损管理:龋坏组织去除的专家共识[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2016,51(12):712-716.
[23] Loch C, Vuuren LJ, Duncan WJ, et al. Ultrastructure and properties of primary carious molars treated using the Hall technique [J]. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2021, 31(3):290-298.
[24] Schwendicke F, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L, et al. Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on carious tissue removal [J]. Adv Dent Res, 2016, 28(2):58-67.
[25] 高朋杰,潘多,魏丽,等.HALL技术结合Carisolv修复乳磨牙大面积缺损的临床研究[J].中国美容医学,2014,23(2):154-156.
[26] Zee VV, Amerongen WE. Short communication: Influence of preformed metal crowns (Hall technique) on the occlusal vertical dimension in the primary dentition [J]. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 2010, 11(5):225-227.
[27] Nair K, Chikkanarasaiah N, Poovani S, et al. Digital occlusal analysis of vertical dimension and maximum intercuspal position after placement of stainless steel crown using Hall technique in children [J]. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2020, 30(6):805-815.
[28] Joseph RM, Rao AP, Srikant N, et al. Evaluation of changes in the occlusion and occlusal vertical dimension in children following the placement of preformed metal crowns using the Hall technique [J]. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2020, 44(2):130-134.
[29] Kaya MS, Taran PK, Bakkal M. Temporomandibular dysfunction assessment in children treated with the Hall technique:A pilot study [J]. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2020, 30(4):429-435.
[30] Dahl BL, Krogstad O. The effect of a partial bite raising splint on the occlusal face height. An X-ray cephalometric study in human adults [J]. Acta odontol Scand, 1982, 40(1):17-24.

Hall技术治疗乳磨牙龋的临床疗效观察

Clinical Efficacy of Carious Primary Molars Treated with Hall Technique

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张斌, 赵敏, 田剑刚, 贾明玉, 翁文灏, 黄瑞哲. 国内外龋白斑的研究热点与趋势的比较——基于WoS和CNKI文献的可视化分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(7): 586-593.
[2]	樊紫萱, 乔里, 赖扬帆, 王鹏, 蒋代仁, 梁燕, 叶朝阳, 罗鹏. 变异链球菌hit基因功能及致龋力影响的初步分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(7): 594-601.
[3]	王婧宇, 姚行媚, 王静文, 刘纯, 赵蕤, 赵熠. 放疗后张口受限患者的咬合重建修复1例[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(7): 654-657.
[4]	赵晓苇, 陈方圆, 危宏平, 李宇红. 噬菌体裂解酶LysP53漱口水的制备与评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(6): 553-557.
[5]	荆瑶, 吴菲, 肖墨, 乔峰, 苑媛, 郭宏磊, 裴海燕, 苗晖, 吴丽更. 后牙邻面壁提升术对牙周探诊出血的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(2): 168-173.
[6]	郭锐, 黄翠. 非龋性颈部缺损粘接前的牙本质处理[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(8): 722-724.
[7]	高一琳, 缪羽. 乳牙釉质发育缺陷与儿童早期龋相关研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(7): 609-612.
[8]	张玲玲, 吕长海. Sonic Fill树脂在乳磨牙修复中的应用及研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(7): 613-615.
[9]	李虎, 管晓燕, 李敏, 董竞男, 肖茜文, 白国辉, 王铭蔚, 刘建国. 防龋基因疫苗pVAX1-GbpA/GBD缓释温敏型水凝胶不同途径免疫兔的效果研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(7): 640-646.
[10]	田芝娟, 施宏燕, 韩祥永. 2017~2021年上海市闵行区学龄前儿童口腔一级预防效果评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(7): 650-653.
[11]	蔡长宇, 冯娜, 杨玉娥. 垫底材料及厚度对下颌第二乳磨牙嵌体修复应力分布影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(7): 654-658.
[12]	余帆, 吕长海, 马雪婷, 伏丽林, 饶南荃, 刘波. 口内扫描仪辅助下预热树脂充填窝沟龋的微渗漏研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(7): 659-665.
[13]	钟婉金, 李月梅, 陈婵婵, 常惠惠, 丁桂聪. iRoot BP Plus乳磨牙活髓切断术3年疗效观察[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(7): 669-672.
[14]	郝鹏翔, 武京. 动机性访谈技术在儿童口腔全麻术后疗效评估[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(7): 687-690.
[15]	刘潇, 陈曦, 李宝, 马改兰, 宫月君, 郭涛. 夹层技术不同充填材料和咬合角度对非龋性颈部缺损牙体应力分布的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(5): 447-453.