高频超声探测牙合板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病效果的临床研究

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2024.10.007

口腔医学研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 885-889.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2024.10.007

高频超声探测牙合板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病效果的临床研究

张磊, 刘锐, 卜海伟, 徐天宇, 霍峰^*

承德医学院附属医院口腔科河北承德 067000

收稿日期:2024-05-09 出版日期:2024-10-28 发布日期:2024-10-24
通讯作者: *霍峰,E-mail:1158242597@qq.com
作者简介:张磊(1989~),男,河北承德人,硕士,主治医师,研究方向:口腔颌面外科学。
基金资助:
河北省医学科学研究重点课题计划(编号:20240886)

Effect of High-frequency Ultrasound Detection on Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders using Repositioning Splint

ZHANG Lei, LIU Rui, BU Haiwei, XU Tianyu, HUO Feng^*

Department of Stomatology, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde 067000, China

Received:2024-05-09 Online:2024-10-28 Published:2024-10-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 应用高频超声测量双侧咬肌的平均厚度及关节囊宽度,探测再定位牙合板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病(temporomandibular joint disorders,TMD)的效果。方法: 随机入选23例因颞下颌关节激发性疼痛及关节弹响就诊于我科的TMD患者作为实验组,同时选取20例健康志愿者作为对照组,实验组采用再定位牙合夹板治疗,分别在治疗前、治疗1月、2月及3月后采用实时高频超声对咬合状态及非咬合状态下双侧咬肌厚度及关节囊宽度进行客观测量,与对照组进行对比,同时记录实验组治疗前后症状的变化。结果: 实验组在牙合板治疗前非咬合状态下双侧咬肌高频超声平均厚度为9.42 mm,咬合后为13.04 mm,对照组非咬合状态下双侧咬肌平均厚度为8.48 mm,咬合后为10.27 mm,两组治疗前咬合状态及非咬合状态下双侧咬肌高频超声厚度差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001),且实验组治疗后每个月咬肌厚度变化均与实验组治疗前存在统计学差异(P<0.001)。关节囊宽度在牙合板治疗前两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后疼痛及弹响症状明显改善,治愈率为52.2%。结论: TMD患者咬肌平均厚度增宽,关节囊宽度无明显变化,牙合板治疗后较治疗前咬肌厚度每月均明显减低,效果显著,高频超声可作为评估牙合板治疗效果的一种有效的工具,为临床诊断及评估治疗TMD的临床效果提供依据。

关键词: 颞下颌关节紊乱, 高频超声, 咬肌厚度, 关节囊宽度

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effect of repositioning splint on temporomandibular disorders (TMD) by measuring the cross-sectional area of bilateral masseter muscles and the width of joint capsule by high-frequency ultrasound. Methods: Twenty-three patients with temporomandibular joint pain and joint play sound visited our department were randomly selected as the experimental group, and 20 healthy volunteers as control group. Experimental group was received positioning grind splint treatment. The thickness of bilateral masseter muscle and the width of joint capsule were measured by high-frequency ultrasound before treatment and 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment, and compared with the control group. The changes of symptoms before and after treatment in the experimental group were recorded. Results: In the experimental group, the average thickness of bilateral masseter muscle was 9.42 mm in the non-occlusal state and 13.04 mm in occlusal state before treatment. In the control group, the average thickness of bilateral masseter muscle was 8.48 mm in the non-occlusal state and 10.27 mm in occlusal state. There was statistical significance between two groups before treatment (P<0.001). Additional, the masseter muscle thickness had significant difference each month after treatment in the experimental group (P<0.001). The joint capsule width in the jaw plate had no statistically significant difference between two groups before treatment (P>0.05). After treatment, the symptoms of pain and ringing were significantly improved, and the cure rate was 52.2%. Conclusion: The effect occlusal plate is significant. High-frequency ultrasound can be used as an effective tool to evaluate the treatment effect of occlusal plate, providing a basis for clinical diagnosis and evaluation of the clinical effect of TMJ disorders.

Key words: temporomandibular joint disorder, high frequency ultrasound, masseter muscle thickness, joint capsule width

张磊, 刘锐, 卜海伟, 徐天宇, 霍峰. 高频超声探测牙合板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病效果的临床研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2024, 40(10): 885-889.

ZHANG Lei, LIU Rui, BU Haiwei, XU Tianyu, HUO Feng. Effect of High-frequency Ultrasound Detection on Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders using Repositioning Splint[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2024, 40(10): 885-889.

参考文献

[1] Lee C, Choi YJ, Jeon KJ, et al. Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging for quantitative parameter evaluation of temporomandibular joint disorders[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2021, 50(5):202-205.
[2] Deregibus A, Ferrillo M, Grazia Piancino M, et al. Are occlusal splints effective in reducing myofascial pain in patients with muscle-related temporomandibular disorders? A randomized-controlled trial[J]. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil, 2021, 67(1): 32-40.
[3] Derwich M, Gottesman L, Urbanska K, et al. Craniovertebral and craniomandibular changes in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders after physiotherapy combined with occlusal splint therapy: A prospective case control study[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2022, 58(5):684-690.
[4] Díaz DZR, Müller CEE, Gavião MBD, et al. Ultrasonographic study of the temporomandibular joint in individuals with and without temporomandibular disorder[J]. J Oral Sci, 2019, 61(4):539-543.
[5] Lee YH, Chun YH, Bae H, et al. Comparison of ultrasonography-based masticatory muscle thickness between temporomandibular disorders bruxers and temporomandibular disorders non-bruxers[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1):6923-6930.
[6] 傅开元,胡敏,余强,等.颞下颌关节常规MRI检查规范及关节盘移位诊断标准的专家共识[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2020,55(9):608-612.
[7] Hu YS, Zhang X, Liu SY, et al. Ultrasound-guided vs conventional arthrocentesis for management of temporomandibular joint disorders:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Cranio, 2023, 41(3):264-273.
[8] Simoen L, Berghe LVD, Jacquet W, et al. Depression and anxiety levels in patients with temporomandibular disorders:comparison with the general population[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2020, 24(11):3939-3945.
[9] Olchowy A, Wieckiewicz M, Winocur E, et al. Great potential of ultrasound elastography for the assessment of the masseter muscle in patients with temporomandibular disorders. A systematic review[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2020, 49(8):1-9.
[10] Blicharz G, Rymarczyk M, Rogulski M, et al. Methods of masseter and temporal muscle thickness and elasticity measurements by ultrasound imaging: a literature review[J]. Curr Med Imaging, 2021, 17(6): 707-713.
[11] Kim JH, Park JH, Kim JW, et al. Can ultrasonography be used to assess capsular distention in the painful temporomandibular joint?[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2021, 21(1): 497-504.
[12] Al-Moraissi EA, Conti PCR, Alyahya A, et al. The hierarchy of different treatments for myogenous temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2022, 26(4):519-533.
[13] Zhang SH, He KX, Lin CJ, et al. Efficacy of occlusal splints in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 2020, 78(8):580-589.
[14] 张玲阁,龙星,蔡恒星,等. 2种不同牙合垫治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的临床疗效分析[J].口腔医学研究,2017,33(6):614-617.
[15] Azlag Pekince K, Caglayan F, Pekince A, et al. Imaging of masseter muscle spasms by ultrasonography: a preliminary study[J]. Oral Radiol, 2020, 36(1): 85-88.

高频超声探测牙合板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病效果的临床研究

Effect of High-frequency Ultrasound Detection on Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders using Repositioning Splint

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	文佳玉, 武峰. 再定位咬合板治疗颞下颌关节盘前移位的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2024, 40(10): 861-866.
[2]	崔宇琛, 张晗, 胡志强, 张琦, 袁佳敏, 朱宪春. 基于机器学习的青年人群颞下颌关节紊乱病风险预测模型的构建[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2024, 40(10): 867-872.
[3]	李佳珩, 曹东元. 应激在颞下颌关节紊乱病发病机制中的作用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(6): 501-504.
[4]	周燕丽, 周薇娜, 于林凤, 王琛, 王冰洁, 张静露. 颞下颌关节盘移位患者髁突运动轨迹分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(2): 186-190.
[5]	张邀光, 房维. 颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(12): 1069-1072.
[6]	涂文星, 冯云霞. 下颌支矢状骨劈开术对颞下颌关节影响的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(6): 516-518.
[7]	许颖捷,邵博,贾梦莹,辜文妍,龚忠诚. 后牙锁牙合与颞下颌关节紊乱病的相关性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(6): 578-582.
[8]	原玉娟, 冯云霞, 任娟, 朱娟娟. 颞下颌关节紊乱病和咬合因素的相关研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(3): 226-228.
[9]	管娟娟, 俞律峰, 邹德荣, 黄艺. 心理及睡眠对颞下颌关节紊乱病影响的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(3): 233-235.
[10]	陈一楠, 周薇娜, 于林凤, 奚晓菁, 王琛, 张静露. 经皮神经电刺激治疗颞下颌关节疼痛的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(3): 254-257.
[11]	石涛, 李阳, 郭英, 邢文忠. 再定位咬合板治疗颞下颌关节盘绞锁患者的临床疗效评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(3): 282-285.
[12]	张颖, 符策广, 卢锦芬, 张清彬. 两种咬合板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的临床疗效评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(3): 294-297.
[13]	刘乙澍, 刘木清, 雷杰, 傅开元. 髁突形态过小与颞下颌关节不可复性盘前移位[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(3): 307-310.
[14]	张玲阁, 龙星, , 蔡恒星. 2种不同牙合垫治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的临床疗效分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(6): 614-617.
[15]	易文静,龚忠诚,王会会,杜军,张勤. 青少年上颌Wilson曲线与颞下颌关节紊乱病的相关性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(12): 1328-1331.