口腔医学研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 406-412.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2025.05.009

• 口腔修复学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

内表面处理对超透氧化锆粘接性能及美学性能影响的研究

周瑜1, 王耀瑶1, 陈梓杰2, 刘璐3, 郝鹏杰4*   

  1. 1.滨州医学院口腔医学院 山东 烟台 264003;
    2.天津市口腔医院修复工艺科 天津 300070;
    3.滨州医学院附属烟台口腔医院修复工艺科 山东 烟台 264000;
    4.滨州医学院附属烟台口腔医院修复科 山东 烟台 264000
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-20 出版日期:2025-05-28 发布日期:2025-05-26
  • 通讯作者: *郝鹏杰,E-mail:1980hpj@163.com
  • 作者简介:周瑜(1998~ ),男,湖北荆州人,硕士,住院医师,研究方向:口腔修复、陶瓷材料。

Study on Effect of Internal Surface Treatment on Bonding Properties and Aesthetic Properties of Super-translucent Zirconia

ZHOU Yu1, WANG Yaoyao1, CHEN Zijie2, LIU Lu3, HAO Pengjie4*   

  1. 1. School of Stomatology, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264003, China;
    2. Department of Prosthodontic Technology, Tianjin Stomatological Hospital, Tianjin 300070, China;
    3. Department of Prosthodontic Technology, Yantai Stomatological Hospital Affiliated to Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264000, China;
    4. Department of Prosthodontics, Yantai Stomatological Hospital Affiliated to Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264000, China
  • Received:2024-12-20 Online:2025-05-28 Published:2025-05-26

摘要: 目的: 比较3种内表面处理方式对超透氧化锆的粘接性能及美学性能的影响,为临床上选择合适的表面处理方式提供参考。方法: 超透氧化锆切削成不同尺寸作为试验标准试件,选择3种表面处理方式(氧化铝喷砂、二硅酸锂涂层、上釉)对其进行处理,然后进行断裂试验、颜色测量。实验数据采用双因素方差分析及事后多重比较(LSD检验)对组间均值对比分析。结果: 粘接强度:二硅酸锂涂层组>上釉组>喷砂组>对照组,色差:喷砂组>上釉组>二硅酸锂涂层组。结论: 二硅酸锂涂层处理后粘接强度明显大于喷砂组及上釉组,同时其产生的色差小于喷砂组及上釉组,小于临床可接受阈值。在不考虑其他条件下,在选择合适的内表面处理方式时建议优先选择二硅酸锂涂层。

关键词: 超透氧化锆, 粘接性能, 美学性能

Abstract: Objective: To compare the effects of three internal surface treatments on the adhesive properties and aesthetic properties of super-translucent zirconia. Methods: Super-translucent zirconia was cut into different sizes as test standard specimens, and three surface treatments (airborne-particle abrasion, lithium disilicate coating, and glaze on) were selected, followed by fracture test and color measurement. The experimental data were analyzed by two-factor ANOVA and post hoc multiple comparisons (LSD test) for comparison of means between groups. Results: Bond strength was lithium disilicate coating group > glazed group > sandblasted group > control group, and color difference was sandblasted group > glazed group > lithium disilicate coating group. Conclusion: The bonding strength after lithium disilicate coating treatment was significantly greater than that of sandblasted group and glazed group, while the color difference was smaller than that of sandblasted group and glazed group, which was less than the clinically acceptable threshold. Without considering other conditions, it is recommended that lithium disilicate coating be preferred when choosing the appropriate internal surface treatment.

Key words: super-translucent zirconia, adhesive properties, aesthetic properties