下颌后牙区SLActive种植体3周早期负荷修复1年随访的临床观察

口腔医学研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 475-478.

下颌后牙区SLActive种植体3周早期负荷修复1年随访的临床观察

耿威^*, 林潇, 李晓光, 李钧

首都医科大学附属北京口腔医院种植中心北京 100050

收稿日期:2015-01-30 出版日期:2015-05-28 发布日期:2016-04-29
通讯作者: 耿威,电话:010-57099172
作者简介:耿威(1971~ ),女,黑龙江人,副主任医师,硕士,主要从事口腔种植修复及相关研究。
基金资助:
首都医学发展科研基金(编号:2009-3143)

Early Loading at the 3rd Week of SLActive Implant in the Posterior Mandible: 1-Year Results of a Clinical Observation.

GENG Wei, LIN Xiao, LI Xiao-guang, et al.

Department of Oral Implantology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Beijing 100050

Received:2015-01-30 Online:2015-05-28 Published:2016-04-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:探讨SLActive种植体3周早期负荷修复的临床可行性。方法:32名患者40枚下颌后牙区种植体行3周早期负荷修复,种植术中、术后1、3、12周、1年应用共振频率分析仪测量种植体稳定性,定量分析种植体稳定性的变化;种植术后1周、3周、12周、1年时拍射平行投照根尖片,测量评估种植体边缘骨水平的变化。结果:3周负荷的种植体种植术后3周与12周及1年,ISQ值存在明显统计学差异(P<0.01),术后1年边缘骨吸收(0.5±0.21) mm,种植体成功率100%。结论:SLActive种植体3周早期负荷修复方案在下颌后牙区可以获得可预期的临床效果。

关键词: 下颌后牙, 种植, 早期负荷, SLActive, 临床观察

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the feasibility of SLActive implants which were functionally loaded after 3 weeks of healing. Methods: 32 partially edentulous patients had a total of 40 implants inserted in the posterior mandibles and underwent undisturbed healing for 3 weeks. The implants were loaded with provisional crowns in the 3rd week. Resonance frequency analysis was assessed by using Osstell MentorTM in the procedure (baseline) and after 1, 3, 12 weeks and 1 year of implants placement. The X-ray cone paralleling radiographs were obtained at 1,3, 12 week and 1 year as well. Results: Statistic analysis revealed that there was a significant difference (P<0.01) between the 3-week and 12-week ISQ values of the implants loaded at the 3rd week, as well as 3-week and 1-year values. The marginal bone was absorbed 0.5±0.21mm within a year after the implants inserted. All the implants were stable without peri-implantitis. The success rate was 100%. Conclusion: The study of using 3-week early loading protocol demonstrates that SLActive implants inserted in posterior mandible may achieve prospective outcomes over a period of 1 year.

Key words: Lower posterior, Implant, Early loading , SLActive , Clinical observation

中图分类号:

R782.1

耿威, 林潇, 李晓光, 李钧. 下颌后牙区SLActive种植体3周早期负荷修复1年随访的临床观察[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(5): 475-478.

GENG Wei, LIN Xiao, LI Xiao-guang, et al.. Early Loading at the 3rd Week of SLActive Implant in the Posterior Mandible: 1-Year Results of a Clinical Observation.[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2015, 31(5): 475-478.

参考文献

[1] Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface [J]. J Dent Res, 2004, 83(7)∶529-533
[2] Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, et al. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA^ titanium implants: Preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs[J]. Clin Oral Implan Res, 2007, 18(4)∶481-488
[3] Valderrama P, Bornstein MM, Jones AA, et al. Effects of implant design on marginal bone changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted acid-etched-surfaced implants: a histologic analysis in dogs [J]. J Periodontol, 2011, 82(7)∶1025-1034
[4] Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, et al. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive^) and conventional SLA titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2007, 34(1)∶78-86
[5] Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, Brgger U, et al. Early loading at 21 days of non-submerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in the posterior mandible [J]. J Periodontol, 2010, 81(6)∶809-818
[6] Sim CPC, Lang N P. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell^TM mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length [J]. Clin Oral Implan Res, 2010, 21(6)∶598-604
[7] 宿玉成等译.牙种植学的负荷方案——牙列缺损的负荷方案.国际口腔种植学会(ITI)口腔种植临床指南[M].第2卷.北京:人民军医出版社,2009∶5
[8] Kim JH, Yang JY, Kim YK, et al. Retrospective results of implants for partially edentulous posterior jaws according to time points of early loading [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2012, 28(5)∶1293-1299
[9] Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, Brgger U, et al. Early loading at 21 days of non-submerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in the posterior mandible [J]. J Periodontol, 2010, 81(6)∶809-818

[1]	胡常琦, 魏振宇, 魏洪武, 夏勋, 黄江琴, 龚金梅, 郭水根. 短种植体(≤6 mm)在萎缩后牙区5~7年疗效的回顾性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(1): 58-62.
[2]	周立伟. 种植多单位修复中螺丝固位与粘接固位联合运用中机械并发症发生情况的回顾性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(1): 63-66.
[3]	余慧敏, 徐多玲. 吸烟对上颌中切牙牙槽骨分型影响——CBCT研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(9): 825-829.
[4]	马国武, 贾崇智. 自体牙骨移植材料在口腔种植领域中的应用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(8): 709-712.
[5]	夏勋, 胡常琦, 黄江琴, 郭水根, 魏洪武. 短种植体冠根比对骨改建的影响:5年临床观察[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(7): 683-687.
[6]	王智, 邹立东. 微创技术在上颌窦内提升植骨中应用效果的影像学评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(7): 688-692.
[7]	刘建国, 周宏博. 医用β钛合金的性能研究现状[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(6): 501-508.
[8]	周延民, 汪汉池. 种植义齿上部修复及其并发症[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(5): 405-409.
[9]	乐柯, 董衡, 陈力, 杨光雯, 陈琳, 刘晖, 周娜, 牟永斌. 应用三维预成型钛网在上颌前牙区骨增量疗效的临床研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(5): 481-485.
[10]	贾永娜, 缑小蕊, 姜丹丹, 唐小雪, 周政. 3种参数Er:YAG激光治疗早期种植体周围炎的临床疗效及细菌学分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(5): 486-489.
[11]	徐鸿玮, 储顺礼. 下颌后牙区水平向骨增量研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(4): 321-323.
[12]	陈江, 张思慧. 无牙颌种植修复的数字化临床诊疗流程[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(3): 193-198.
[13]	于凯璇, 周延民. 放疗对骨组织及种植体周围骨结合影响的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(3): 209-212.
[14]	汪汉池, 孙晓琳, 方蛟, 杜留熠, 彭培轩, 周延民. 不同种植体表面改性对细菌生物膜的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(3): 235-238.
[15]	吴千驹, 张志升, 林志明, 金地, 张怡, 骆碧珠. 新型负载生物离子种植体涂层的抗菌学研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(3): 247-250.