口腔医学研究

口腔医学研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 518-521.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.05.014

• 口腔种植学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

3种CAD/CAM内连接个性化基台的边缘密合性研究

朱青1,2, 朱陈元2,3, 佘文珺2,3*, 焦婷2,3*   

  1. 1. 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院牙体牙髓科 上海 200011;
    2. 上海市口腔医学重点实验室/上海市口腔医学研究所,国家口腔疾病临床研究中心,上海 200011;
    3. 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔修复科 上海 200011
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-16 出版日期:2018-05-28 发布日期:2018-05-29
  • 通讯作者: 佘文珺,E-mail:drshe@sina.com
    焦婷,E-mail: jiao_ting@126.com
  • 作者简介:朱青(1988~ ),女, 浙江湖州人,医师,硕士,主要从事口腔种植学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    上海市科委重点项目(编号:114119a3900、14411964200)

Marginal Fitness of Three Types of CAD/CAM Customized Abutments between Implant-abutment Interfaces.

ZHU Qing1,2, ZHU Chen-yuan2,3, SHE Wen-jun2,3*, JIAO Ting2,3*   

  1. 1. Department of Endodontics, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China;
    2. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, National Center for Clinical Research of Oral Diseases, Shanghai 200011, China;
    3. Department of Prosthodontics, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2017-11-16 Online:2018-05-28 Published:2018-05-29

PDF (PC)

250

摘要： 目的:比较3种CAD/CAM个性化种植体基台(一段式氧化锆基台、两段式氧化锆基台和一段式钛基台)与种植体替代体界面内部连接的适合性。方法:3SHAPE软件设计CAD/CAM个性化基台,数据导入计算机控制的切削系统,切削加工一段式氧化锆基台、两段式氧化锆基台和一段式钛基台(N=15);将基台与NobelActiveTM种植体替代体连接,应用体视显微镜测量种植体替代体-基台界面边缘微间隙,统计分析数据结果。结果:一段式氧化锆组的边缘间隙最大,两段式氧化锆组的边缘间隙次之,最小的为一段式钛基台组;各组之间唇侧、舌侧、近中侧、远中侧的边缘间隙值没有统计学差异。结论:一段式钛基台具有最优的种植体-基台界面密合性。

关键词: CAD/CAM, 个性化基台, 骨水平种植体, 氧化锆基台, 边缘密合性

Abstract: Objective: To compare the marginal fitness of three types of CAD/CAM customized implant abutments (one-piece zirconia abutments, two-piece zirconia abutments and one-piece titanium abutments) between the implant-abutment interfaces. Methods: 3SHAPE software was used to design the customized CAD/CAM abutments. Three types of implants including one-piece zirconia abutments, two-piece zirconia abutments, and one-piece titanium abutment were fabricated after importing the designed data into computer-controlled cutting system (n=15). Stereomicroscope was used to measure the micro-gap of the implant-abutment interface. The results of the gap value were analyzed using statistical method. Results: The titanium abutment showed the lowest gap values, and those of the two-piece zirconia abutments were lower than those of the one-piece zirconia abutments. There was no statistical difference on the gap values among the palatal, labial, mesial, and distal surfaces in the same type of abutment. Conclusion: The one-piece titanium abutment showed the best marginal fit.

Key words: CAD/CAM, Zirconia abutment, Transgingival height, Titanium abutment, Marginal fit