基于CBCT对错牙合畸形切牙区牙槽骨形态的研究

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.05.018

口腔医学研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 535-538.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.05.018

基于CBCT对错牙合畸形切牙区牙槽骨形态的研究

邓如平¹, 张漫^2*

1. 右江民族医学院附属医院口腔科广西百色 533000;
2. 武汉大学口腔医院正畸一科湖北武汉 430079

收稿日期:2017-10-27 出版日期:2018-05-28 发布日期:2018-05-29
通讯作者: 张漫,E-mail:zhangman whu@163.com
作者简介:邓如平(1982~ ),男,湖南人,主治医师,硕士研究生,主要从事青少年错牙合畸形的固定及活动矫治工作。

Study on Incisors Alveolar Morphology in Malocclusion Patients Based on CBCT Data.

DENG Ru-ping¹, Zhang Man²

1. Department of Stomatology, Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities. Baise 533000, China;
2. Department of Orthodontics Division 1, Stomatology Hospital, Wuhan University. Wuhan 430079, China

Received:2017-10-27 Online:2018-05-28 Published:2018-05-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:利用CBCT研究成人不同骨性错牙合患者的上下颌切牙区牙槽骨形态特征。方法:选取符合纳入标准的95例CBCT数据,依骨性关系进行安氏分类。对上下切牙区牙槽骨的厚度、高度等相关指标进行测量和分析。结果:1)高度方面,骨性Ⅲ类在上切牙唇侧高度值最小,有统计学差异(P <0.05)。骨性II类上切牙腭侧高度值及下切牙舌侧高度值最大,有统计学差异(P<0.05)。2)厚度方面,骨性Ⅲ类在与骨性Ⅰ类、骨性Ⅱ类的比较中,有5项测量值最小,骨性I类有3项测量值最大,骨性Ⅱ类有2项测量值最大。以上所有对应的最大值与最小值进行比较,存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:不同成人骨性分类上下颌切牙区牙槽骨形态存在差异。

关键词: CBCT, 骨性错牙合, 牙槽骨形态, 切牙

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the incisors alveolar morphology in patients with different kinds of malocclusion using CBCT data. Methods: According to inclusion criteria, 95 adult patients were included, examined, and classified. The incisors alveolar bone vertical height and thickness were measured and compared with CBCT. Results:As to alveolar height, the labial vertical height of maxillary incisors of Class III was the least (P<0.05), and the palatal vertical height of maxillary incisors and the lingual vertical height of mandibular incisors of Class II were the most (P<0.05). As to alveolar thickness, there were 5 smallest values in Class III, 3 biggest values in Class I and 2 biggest values in Class II (P<0.05). Conclusion: The incisors alveolar morphologies in malocclusion patients were different.

Key words: CBCT, Skeletal malocclusion, Alveolar bone morphology, Incisor

邓如平, 张漫. 基于CBCT对错牙合畸形切牙区牙槽骨形态的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(5): 535-538.

DENG Ru-ping, Zhang Man. Study on Incisors Alveolar Morphology in Malocclusion Patients Based on CBCT Data.[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2018, 34(5): 535-538.

参考文献

[1] 孟焕新.牙周病学[M].第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013
[2] Wang HM, Shen JW, Yu MF, et al. Analysis of facial bone wall dimensions and sagittal root position in the maxillary esthetic zone: a retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2014,29(5)∶1123-1129
[3] Bagis N, Kolsuz ME, Kursun S, et al. Comparison of intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of periodontal defects: an in vitro study [J]. BMC Oral Health,2015,15∶64
[4] Braun X, Ritter L, Jervøe-Storm PM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT for periodontal lesions [J]. Clin Oral Investig,2014,18(4)∶1229-1236
[5] Tian YL, Liu F, Sun HJ, et al. Alveolar bone thickness around maxillary central incisors of different inclination assessed with cone-beam computed tomography [J]. Korean J Orthod, 2015, 45(5)∶245-252
[6] 赵海礁,谭丽思,王宏岩.应用锥形束CT浅析牙周基础治疗对慢性牙周炎牙槽骨骨量的影响[J].口腔医学研究,2015,31(10)∶1008-1012
[7] 孙振球.医学统计学[M].第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014
[8] Scheibel PC, Ramos AL, Iwaki LC, et al. Analysis of correlation between initial alveolar bone density and apical root resorption after 12 months of orthodontic treatment without extraction [J]. Dental Press J Orthod,2014,19(5)∶97-102
[9] Yatabe MS, Ozawa TO, Janson G, et al. Are there bone dehiscences in maxillary canines orthodontically moved into the grafted alveolar cleft [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2015,147(2)∶205-213
[10] Zekry A, Wang R, Chau A C, et al. Facial alveolar bone wall width - a cone-beam computed tomography study in Asians [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res,2014,25(2)∶194-206
[11] S Demircan, E Demircan.Dental cone beam computed tomography analyses of the anterior maxillary bone thickness for immediate implant placement [J]. Implant Dentistry,2015,24(6)∶664-668
[12] Mandelaris GA, Neiva R, Chambrone L. Cone-beam computed tomography and interdisciplinary dentofacial therapy: an American academy of periodontology best evidence review focusing on risk assessment of the dentoalveolar bone changes influenced by tooth movement [J]. J Periodontol,2017,88(10)∶960-977
[13] Nguyen T, Cevidanes L, Paniagua B, et al. Use of shape correspondence analysis to quantify skeletal changes associated with bone-anchored Class III correction [J]. Angle Orthod,2014,84(2)∶329-336

[1]	余慧敏, 徐多玲. 吸烟对上颌中切牙牙槽骨分型影响——CBCT研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(9): 825-829.
[2]	杨绿丽, 沈斯特, 陈晓玲, 林垚. 下颌第一前磨牙C形牙根根面沟及根管分型的CBCT研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(9): 830-834.
[3]	张晗, 李永辉, 杨若仪, 白璐, 吴聿淼, 李祥, 王谜, 朱宪春. 隐形矫治在口腔扫描图像上牙列中线的确定方法[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(8): 761-765.
[4]	吴连俊, 姚李韬, 张彩霞, 刘传通. 切牙管形态学特征的CBCT测量分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(7): 693-697.
[5]	李茜茜, 康婷, 陈燕语, 宋丹阳, 郭玲. 上颌中切牙斜形折裂修复设计的有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(3): 259-263.
[6]	陈世炜, 伍晓红. 根管治疗后下颌切牙瓷贴面与全瓷冠两种修复方式的抗折裂性对比研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(3): 269-272.
[7]	李天一, 徐明耀, 万延俊, 张阳, 成雨生, 张红闯, 王超, 张扬. 两种腭裂修复方式治疗过宽不完全腭裂的临床效果比较[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(2): 148-151.
[8]	谢燕燕, 高红, 王雪芹. 上颌中切牙与多生牙融合1例[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(2): 185-186.
[9]	张荷馨, 李新月. 重度牙周炎拔牙后位点保存不同膜覆盖技术的疗效评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(10): 962-967.
[10]	王雪涛, 李璁, 李向春, 李芳凝. CBCT对下颌第三磨牙手术术式选择的影响作用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(1): 33-36.
[11]	邹晨, 邹道星, 艾毅龙. 口内三维扫描结合CBCT建立数字化模型的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(9): 902-905.
[12]	任留阳, 熊晖. 上颌快速扩弓对安氏Ⅱ类1分类青少年患者上气道体积的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(8): 786-789.
[13]	闫弘静,李志民,冯婧,宋子琦,王博,张丽,张祖燕. 锥形束临床应用现状分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(2): 155-158.
[14]	朱彦霏,马伟程,耿金欢,刘茜,丁玉梅,李蜀鄂. 锥形束CT测量上颌中切牙根径及骨板厚度研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(2): 159-162.
[15]	刘之奥, 徐卫华, 郑之峻. 基于CBCT的后段牙合平面和下颌骨形态间相关性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(11): 1078-1083.

基于CBCT对错牙合畸形切牙区牙槽骨形态的研究

Study on Incisors Alveolar Morphology in Malocclusion Patients Based on CBCT Data.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics