纯钛或钛合金种植材料表面不同纳米结构对细胞行为的影响

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.07.004

口腔医学研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 699-702.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.07.004

纯钛或钛合金种植材料表面不同纳米结构对细胞行为的影响

蔡彦坤, 郑国莹, 隋磊^*

天津医科大学口腔医院修复科天津 300070

收稿日期:2017-10-06 出版日期:2018-07-28 发布日期:2018-07-20
通讯作者: 隋磊, E-mail:suilei@tmu.edu.cn
作者简介:蔡彦坤(1992~ ),女,天津人,硕士在读,主要从事口腔修复学及口腔种植材料研究。
基金资助:
天津市自然科学基金重点项目(编号:16JCZDJC32800)

Effects of Different Nanostructures on Titanium or Titanium Alloy Implant Surface on Cell Behaviors

CAI Yan-kun, ZHENG Guo-ying, SUI Lei^*

Department of Prosthodontics,Tianjin Medical University Hospital of Stomatology, Tianjin 300070,China.

Received:2017-10-06 Online:2018-07-28 Published:2018-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 种植材料表面可通过多种处理方法得到不同形态的纳米级结构,从而对细胞成骨相关的生物学行为产生重要影响。本文综述了纯钛或钛合金种植材料表面不同形态的纳米结构对细胞成骨相关生物学行为的影响,以期为种植体表面形貌的进一步改良及临床应用提供理论依据。

关键词: 纳米结构, 表面形貌, 成骨, 细胞粘附

Abstract: Different nanostructures of implant surface can be obtained by diverse methods, which have important effects on biological behaviors related to osteogenesis. In this paper, the influence of different nanostructures of titanium or titanium alloy implant surface on osteogenesis related cell behaviors is reviewed. It is aimed to provide theoretical basis for further improvement to implant surface topography and clinical application.

Key words: Nanostructure, Surface topography, Osteogenesis Cell adhesion

蔡彦坤, 郑国莹, 隋磊. 纯钛或钛合金种植材料表面不同纳米结构对细胞行为的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(7): 699-702.

CAI Yan-kun, ZHENG Guo-ying, SUI Lei. Effects of Different Nanostructures on Titanium or Titanium Alloy Implant Surface on Cell Behaviors[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2018, 34(7): 699-702.

参考文献

[1] Goldman M, Juodzbalys G, Vilkinis V. Titanium surfaces with nanostructures influence on osteoblasts proliferation: a systematic review [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Res, 2014, 5(3):e1
[2] Zhao L, Mei S, Chu PK, et al. The influence of hierarchical hybrid micro/nano-textured titanium surface with titania nanotubes on osteoblast functions [J]. Biomaterials, 2010, 31(19):5072-5082
[3] Huang Q, Elkhooly TA, Liu X, et al. Effects of hierarchical micro/nano-topographies on the morphology, proliferation and differentiation of osteoblast-like cells [J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2016, 145:37-45
[4] Brammer KS, Frandsen CJ, Jin S. TiO₂ nanotubes for bone regeneration [J]. Trends Biotechnol, 2012, 30(6):315-322
[5] Gongadze E, Kabaso D, Bauer S, et al. Adhesion of osteoblasts to a nanorough titanium implant surface [J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2011, 6:1801-1816
[6] Zhao L, Liu L, Wu Z, et al. Effects of micropitted/nanotubular titania topographies on bone mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation [J]. Biomaterials, 2012, 33(9):2629-2641
[7] Park J, Bauer S, Schlegel KA, et al. TiO₂ nanotube surfaces: 15 nm--an optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiation[J]. Small, 2009, 5(6):666-671
[8] Park J, Bauer S, von der Mark K, et al. Nanosize and vitality TiO₂ nanotube diameter directs cell fate [J]. Nano Lett, 2007, 7(6):1686-1691
[9] Gittens RA, Olivares-Navarrete R, McLachlan T, et al. Differential responses of osteoblast lineage cells to nanotopographically-modified, microroughened titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy surfaces [J]. Biomaterials, 2012, 33(35):8986-8994
[10] Dey T, Roy P, Fabry B, et al. Anodic mesoporous TiO₂ layer on Ti for enhanced formation of biomimetic hydroxyapatite [J]. Acta Biomater, 2011, 7(4):1873-1879
[11] Zhang W, Li Z, Huang Q, et al. Effects of a hybrid micro/nanorod topography-modified titanium implant on adhesion and osteogenic differentiation in rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells [J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2013, 8:257-265
[12] Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Dalby MJ. Nanotopographical modification: a regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions [J]. Nanomedicine, 2010, 6(5):619-633
[13] Qiu J, Li J, Wang S, et al. TiO₂ nanorod array constructed nanotopography for regulation of mesenchymal stem cells fate and the realization of location-committed stem cell differentiation [J]. Small, 2016, 12(13):1770-1778
[14] Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Oreffo RO. Harnessing nanotopography and integrin-matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate [J]. Nat Mater, 2014, 13(6):558-569
[15] Zhou J, Li B, Han Y, et al. The osteogenic capacity of biomimetic hierarchical micropore/nanorod-patterned Sr-HA coatings with different interrod spacings [J]. Nanomedicine, 2016, 12(5):1161-1173
[16] Gardin C, Ferroni L, Favero L, et al. Nanostructured biomaterials for tissue engineered bone tissue reconstruction [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2012, 13(1):737-757
[17] Rani VV, Vinoth-Kumar L, Anitha VC, et al. Osteointegration of titanium implant is sensitive to specific nanostructure morphology [J]. Acta Biomater, 2012, 8(5):1976-1989
[18] Kim J, Kim HN, Lim KT, et al. Synergistic effects of nanotopography and co-culture with endothelial cells on osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells [J]. Biomaterials, 2013, 34(30):7257-7268
[19] Biela SA, Su Y, Spatz JP, et al. Different sensitivity of human endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts to topography in the nano-micro range [J]. Acta Biomater, 2009, 5(7):2460-2466
[20] Wittenbrink I, Hausmann A, Schickle K, et al. Low-aspect ratio nanopatterns on bioinert alumina influence the response and morphology of osteoblast-like cells [J]. Biomaterials, 2015, 62:58-65
[21] 许嘉允,邓飞龙,庄秀妹,等.纯钛微纳米复合形貌对成骨细胞生物学行为的影响[J].中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(6):461-469
[22] Gittens RA, McLachlan T, Olivares-Navarrete R, et al. The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation [J]. Biomaterials, 2011, 32(13):3395-3403
[23] Gittens RA, Olivares-Navarrete R, Schwartz Z, et al. Implant osseointegration and the role of microroughness and nanostructures: lessons for spine implants [J]. Acta Biomater, 2014, 10(8):3363-3371
[24] Liang J, Xu S, Shen M, et al. Osteogenic activity of titanium surfaces with hierarchical micro-/nano-structures obtained by hydrofluoric acid treatment [J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2017, 12:1317-1328

纯钛或钛合金种植材料表面不同纳米结构对细胞行为的影响

Effects of Different Nanostructures on Titanium or Titanium Alloy Implant Surface on Cell Behaviors

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	周何洁, 李胜鸿, 彭培钊, 唐榕, 李艾莲, 曾锦. “红色复合体”致病菌裂解液对人牙周膜细胞成骨分化能力的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(9): 839-843.
[2]	王珈璐, 张卫兵. 牵张力作用下小鼠颅骨缝成骨的定量分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(8): 753-756.
[3]	马兰, 禹怡君, 刘含笑, 刘超, 苗雷英. 黄连素促人牙髓干细胞成骨/成牙本质细胞向分化[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(7): 639-643.
[4]	何林, 何淞, 吴稀, 杨森. 人根尖乳头干细胞在羟基磷灰石和聚多巴胺-羟基磷灰石上的粘附、增殖及成骨分化[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(6): 523-527.
[5]	邬扬绚, 向黎, 黄志强, 褚金海. 釉基质蛋白衍生物调节牙龈卟啉单胞菌感染牙周膜干细胞成骨分化的作用及机制[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(6): 534-538.
[6]	霍冬梅, 徐燕, 胡韶光, 汪芹芹, 王荣海. 人血小板裂解液对牙髓间充质细胞成骨分化的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(6): 539-543.
[7]	陈振宇, 潘颖菁, 张艳, 贺玺, 黄达鸿. 葛根素对高浓度糖皮质激素环境下MC3T3-E1前成骨细胞生物学性能的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(6): 544-547.
[8]	刘阳, 李善昌, 王长振, 周红梅, 董国福, 赵雪龙, 刘琦. 静磁场对大鼠下颌骨骨折愈合的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(6): 548-553.
[9]	王楠, 周延民. 石墨烯材料在口腔医学领域的应用及生物安全性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(5): 410-412.
[10]	刘培红, 马肃, 李永恒, 王海侠. 细胞外基质蛋白DMP1-C和DMP1-N在咬合创伤治疗前后大鼠髁突软骨内的差异表达[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(5): 443-448.
[11]	何梦婷, 白丁. 牙囊在牙萌出的作用及其调控机制研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(2): 107-110.
[12]	王素文, 赖思煜, 习利军, 王利宏. 黄芪甲苷调节人牙周膜细胞炎症反应及成骨分化的作用及机制研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(2): 121-125.
[13]	卢永超, 王伟, 吕翱, 刘逸卿, 杜毅. 炎症微环境下骨髓间充质干细胞骨向分化中Periostin基因表达研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(12): 1148-1152.
[14]	张成晓雪, 赵青. 微小RNA-155调控骨代谢的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(11): 992-995.
[15]	左志刚, 李洪发, 王悦, 郑朝, 杨子靓, 刘珊, 刘大勇. SIRT1对正畸静压力刺激下牙周膜干细胞成骨分化的调控作用及机制[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(11): 1069-1073.