下颌骨正中联合部囊性病变有限元建模及生物力学研究

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.03.015

口腔医学研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 250-254.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.03.015

下颌骨正中联合部囊性病变有限元建模及生物力学研究

庞亚倩¹, 刘亮¹, 冯大军², 李婕¹, 王栋¹, 张凯^1*

1.蚌埠医学院第一附属医院口腔科安徽蚌埠 233000;
2.安徽医科大学第四附属医院口腔颌面外科安徽合肥 230001

收稿日期:2020-09-21 发布日期:2021-03-19
通讯作者: *张凯,E-mail:zk29788@163.com
作者简介:庞亚倩(1994~ ),女,山东潍坊人,硕士在读,医师,研究方向口腔全科。
基金资助:
安徽医科大学校科研基金项目(编号:2019xkj151)

Finite Element Modeling and Biomechanics Analysis of Cystic Lesions in Mandibular Central Junction Part

PANG Yaqian¹, LIU Liang¹, FENG Dajun², LI Jie¹, WANG Dong¹, ZHANG Kai^1*

1. Department of Stomatology, the First Hospital Affiliated to Banghu Medical College. Bengbu 233000, China;
2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230001, China

Received:2020-09-21 Published:2021-03-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:建立下颌骨正中联合部囊性病变三维有限元模型,探讨功能载荷下病变区的生物力学特点以及应力分布情况。方法:选用牙颌系统正常的健康成年女性志愿者,以下颌骨螺旋CT扫描数据为基础,结合Mimics、Geomagic Studio等软件,构建出下颌骨正中联合部囊性病变三维有限元模型,分析在一定约束及载荷条件下病变区骨吸收与病理性骨折潜在风险之间的关系。结果:在计算机上建立了能够反映囊肿特征的有限元模型,功能载荷下正中联合部囊肿大小至38.18 mm×9.53 mm×23.49 mm时,应力集中区Von Mises应力值达到81.205 Mpa,接近骨性材料的屈服强度,此时舌、唇侧及下颌骨下缘临界骨厚度分别为1.33 mm、0.66 mm、1.69 mm。结论:当下颌骨正中联合部囊性病变区舌、唇侧及下颌骨下缘骨厚度阈值分别至1.33 mm、0.66 mm、1.69 mm时,从生物力学角度考虑颌骨强度因皮质骨大范围吸收而显著降低,此阈值可为制定Ⅰ期开窗减压联合Ⅱ期刮治术式提供一定的参考依据。

关键词: 下颌骨, 三维有限元, 囊性病变, 生物力学分析, 病理性骨折

Abstract: Objective: To establish a three-dimensional finite element model and to investigate the biomechanical characteristics and stress distribution of the cystic lesion in the mandibular central junction part. Methods: A three-dimensional finite element model with cystic lesions in the mandibular central junction part was constructed, based on the spiral CT scan data of a healthy adult female volunteer with normal occlusion relationship, using Mimics, Geomagic Studio, and other software. The relationship between bone resorption in the lesion area and potential risk of pathological fracture under certain constraints and loads was analyzed. Results: The finite element model that can reflect the characteristics of the cyst was established. When the size of the cyst in the mandibular central junction part reached 38.18 mm×9.53 mm×23.49 mm under functional load, the Von Mises value in the stress concentrated area reached 81.205 Mpa, which was close to the yield strength of bone materials, and the critical bone mass in the lingual side, the lip side, and the lower margin of the mandible were 1.33 mm, 0.66 mm, and 1.69 mm, respectively. Conclusion: From the perspective of biomechanics, the strength of jaw significantly reduced due to a wide range of absorption of cortical bone. The remaining bone thickness in the lingual side, lip side, and lower margin of mandible may provide a reference for the development of one-stage decompression combined with two-stage curettage surgical treatment.

Key words: mandible, three dimensional finite element analysis, cystic lesion, biomechanical analysis, pathological fracture

庞亚倩, 刘亮, 冯大军, 李婕, 王栋, 张凯. 下颌骨正中联合部囊性病变有限元建模及生物力学研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(3): 250-254.

PANG Yaqian, LIU Liang, FENG Dajun, LI Jie, WANG Dong, ZHANG Kai. Finite Element Modeling and Biomechanics Analysis of Cystic Lesions in Mandibular Central Junction Part[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(3): 250-254.

参考文献

[1] Sarrafpour B, El-Bacha C, Li Q, et al. Roles of functional strain and capsule compression on mandibular cyst expansion and cortication [J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2019, 98:1-8.
[2] 陶谦,兰天俊.开窗治疗颌骨囊性病变的临床思考与循证[J].口腔疾病防治,2018,26(12): 759-765.
[3] Slusarenko da Silva Y, Stoelinga PJW, Naclério-Homem MDG. The presentation of odontogenic keratocysts in the jaws with an emphasis on the tooth-bearing area: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019, 23(2): 133-147.
[4] Patussi C, Sassi LM, Cruz R, et al. Evaluation of different stable internal fixation in unfavorable mandible fractures under finite element analysis [J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019, 23(3): 317-324.
[5] Arora L, Bhardwaj S, Hashmi GS, et al. Finite element analysis (FEA) of perpendicular plating versus conventional plating in mandibular symphysis fracture [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 19(1): 143-148.
[6] Kilinc Y, Zor ZF, Tumer MK, et al. Does the angulation of the mandibular third molar influence the fragility of the mandibular angle after trauma to the mandibular body? A three-dimensional finite-element study [J]. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, 2018, 21(7): 488- 497.
[7] 庞亚倩,张凯,刘亮,等.下颌骨囊性病变的三维有限元模型生物力学分析[J].南方医科大学学报,2020,40(6):911-915.
[8] 陈俊良,李明霞,吕冬梅,等.迷你种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿三维有限元分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2020,24(10):1491-1495.
[9] Alsrrouji MS, Ahmad R, Abdul Razak NH, et al. Premaxilla stress distribution and bone resorption induced by implant overdenture and conventional denture [J]. J Prosthodont, 2019, 28(2): e764 -e770.
[10] 李茜茜,康婷,陈燕语,等.上颌中切牙斜形折裂修复设计的有限元分析[J].口腔医学研究,2020,36(03):259-263.
[11] 缑小蕊,周政,姜丹丹.种植覆盖义齿修复不同骨质类型的Kennedy Ⅰ类缺失的三维有限元分析[J].口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(9): 855-860.
[12] 王爽,孙江,于雁云.基于CBCT图像的颌骨及牙列有限元建模方法研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志, 2019, 35(1):55-59.
[13] 颜丹,张锡忠,王建国.螺纹深度对支抗微种植体和颌骨影响的三维有限元分析[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2019,46(4):387-392.
[14] 于豪,白石柱,冯志宏,等.聚醚醚酮用于桩核冠修复的三维有限元分析[J].实用口腔医学杂志, 2020, 36(1):5-9.
[15] Kawabata Y, Matsuo K, Nezu Y, et al. The risk assessment of pathological fracture in the proximal femur using a CT-based finite element method [J]. J Orthop Sci, 2017, 22(5): 931-937.
[16] Ayali A. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different plating techniques for unfavorable mandibular angle fractures [J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2018, 29(3): 603-607.
[17] Carlsen A. Spontaneous fractures of the mandible concept & treatment strategy [J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2016, 21(1): e88-e94.

下颌骨正中联合部囊性病变有限元建模及生物力学研究

Finite Element Modeling and Biomechanics Analysis of Cystic Lesions in Mandibular Central Junction Part

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张立刚, 易杰, 张霓霓, 姚礼, 黄桂林, 胡小华, 代敏, 任小清. 儿童下颌第二磨牙冠周炎致下颌骨骨髓炎的临床诊治[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(3): 246-249.
[2]	缑小蕊, 周政, 姜丹丹, 陈苗苗, 纪东. 种植覆盖义齿修复不同骨质类型的KennedyⅠ类缺失的三维有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(9): 855-860.
[3]	王冬香, 王光素, 唐正龙, 陈友利, 高琼, 安宁. 下颌骨髁突高位骨折游离复位愈合过程中DKK-1/BMP-2的表达研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(8): 748-752.
[4]	叶斯哈提·木合塔尔, 克热木·阿巴司, 胡露露, 龚忠诚. 6例下颌骨Garrè's骨髓炎临床分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(7): 678-682.
[5]	苏涛, 王星星, 向彪, 吴刚, 邹敏. 不同刚度的无托槽隐形矫治器扩大上颌牙弓的有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(5): 454-458.
[6]	李茜茜, 康婷, 陈燕语, 宋丹阳, 郭玲. 上颌中切牙斜形折裂修复设计的有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(3): 259-263.
[7]	王兴涛, 刘才华, 吕玉祥, 靳乐, 刘筱菁. 机器人系统在腓骨修复下颌骨重建中的动物试验研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(11): 1040-1044.
[8]	刘刚, 张良, 李长顺. 双侧下颌骨矢状劈开截骨后退术对骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形患者上气道的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(10): 938-941.
[9]	鲁婷玮, 刘朝明, 吴添福, 邵喆, 孙艳芳, 孙志军, 刘冰. 个性化原位塑形导板在血管化髂骨肌瓣修复下颌骨缺损中的应用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(8): 766-771.
[10]	李希光, 郅克谦, 高岭, 张博, 周民战, 肖林京. 基于三维有限元评价种植体不同倾斜角度在上颌后牙区骨量不足的应力分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(7): 671-675.
[11]	程慧敏, 庄芳璐, 阿地力·莫明. 3种创伤严重度评分法对下颌骨骨折评估的对比分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(7): 701-703.
[12]	陈俊良, 刘旭琳, 张潇月, 田欣, 何芸. 短种植体修复牙槽骨严重吸收的下颌第二磨牙的三维有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(3): 246-250.
[13]	梁燕, 马文, 聂焱, 付帅, 张长彬, 崔庆赢, 王立冬, 黎明. 3D打印塞治器在下颌骨囊性病变中的应用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(12): 1153-1156.
[14]	刘之奥, 徐卫华, 郑之峻. 基于CBCT的后段牙合平面和下颌骨形态间相关性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(11): 1078-1083.
[15]	康婷, 石思琼, 赵威, 郑睿, 李茜茜, 解静, 郭玲. 上颌第一前磨牙舌尖斜形折裂不同修复设计的有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(10): 953-956.