牙龈表型分型的现状与展望

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.01.005

口腔医学研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 20-23.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.01.005

牙龈表型分型的现状与展望

杨大国, 任秀云^*

山西医科大学口腔医学院,口腔医院牙周科山西太原 030001

收稿日期:2021-10-12 出版日期:2022-01-28 发布日期:2022-01-21
通讯作者: * 任秀云,E-mail:rxy611@163.com
作者简介:杨大国(1992~ ),男,山西人,硕士在读,主要研究方向为牙周病学。

Present Situation and Prospect in the Typing of Gingival Phenotype

YANG Daguo, REN Xiuyun^*

Department of Periodontology, Shanxi Medical University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Taiyuan 030001, China

Received:2021-10-12 Online:2022-01-28 Published:2022-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 牙龈表型对口腔治疗的风险评估、治疗方案的制定和预后评估有重要意义。2018年欧洲牙周病联合会与美国牙周病学会的共识性报告,建议采用牙周探针透视法将牙龈表型分为薄厚两型,薄型的牙龈厚度≤1 mm,厚型的牙龈厚度＞1 mm。此分型未被证明是最佳的指导临床实践的分型方法,并且定量测量牙周探针可见时的牙龈厚度值与1 mm也有明显差异。目前,越来越多的研究建议将牙龈表型分为3型对临床更具有指导意义,而且三分型也被统计学证实。本文就牙龈表型的分型进行综述。

关键词: 牙龈表型, 分型, 牙龈厚度

Abstract: Gingival phenotype plays an important role in risk assessment, therapeutic regimen, and prognosis evaluation of oral treatment. According to the consensus report of European Federation of Periodontology and American Academy of Periodontology in 2018, the gingival phenotype is recommended to divide into two types by means of periodontal exploration: thin gingival thickness (≤1 mm) and thick gingival thickness (>1 mm). However, these two types have not been proved to be the best method to guide clinical practice, and the quantitative measurement of the gingival thickness is also significantly different from 1mm when the periodontal probe is visible. At present, more and more studies have suggested that classifying gingival phenotype into three types is more instructive for clinical practice, which has also been confirmed statistically. This article reviews on the typing of gingival phenotype.

Key words: gingival phenotype, typing, gingival thickness

杨大国, 任秀云. 牙龈表型分型的现状与展望[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(1): 20-23.

YANG Daguo, REN Xiuyun. Present Situation and Prospect in the Typing of Gingival Phenotype[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2022, 38(1): 20-23.

参考文献

[1] Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM, et al. Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions [J]. J Periodontol, 2018, 89 Suppl 1:S237-S248.
[2] Kim DM, Bassir SH, Nguyen TT. Effect of gingival phenotype on the maintenance of periodontal health: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review [J]. J Periodontol, 2020, 91(3):311-338.
[3] Frost NA, Mealey BL, Jones AA, et al. Periodontal biotype: Gingival thickness as it relates to probe visibility and buccal plate thickness [J]. J Periodontol, 2015, 86(10):1141-1149.
[4] Kan JY, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, et al. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2010, 30(3):237-243.
[5] Rathee M, Rao PL, Bhoria M. Prevalence of gingival biotypes among young dentate north Indian population: A biometric approach [J]. Int J Clin Pediatric Dent, 2016, 9(2):104-108.
[6] Cairo F, Cortellini P, Nieri M, et al. Coronally advanced flap and composite restoration of the enamel with or without connective tissue graft for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recession with non-carious cervical lesion. A randomized controlled clinical trial [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2020, 47(3):362-371.
[7] Cairo F, Cortellini P, Pilloni A, et al. Clinical efficacy of coronally advanced flap with or without connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions in the aesthetic area: a randomized controlled clinical trial [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2016, 43(10):849-856.
[8] Huang LH, Neiva RE, Wang HL. Factors affecting the outcomes of coronally advanced flap root coverage procedure [J]. J Periodontol, 2005, 76(10):1729-1734.
[9] Fischer KR, Kunzlberger A, Donos N, et al. Gingival biotype revisited-novel classification and assessment tool [J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2018, 22(1):443-448.
[10] Alves PHM, Alves TCLP, Pegoraro TA, et al. Measurement properties of gingival biotype evaluation methods [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20(3):280-284.
[11] Nagate RR, Tikare S, Chaturvedi S, et al. A novel perspective for predicting gingival biotype via dentopapillary measurements on study models in the Saudi population: Cross-sectional study [J]. Niger J Clin Pract, 2019, 22(1):56-62.
[12] Borges GJ, Ruiz LF, de Alencar AH, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography as a diagnostic method for determination of gingival thickness and distance between gingival margin and bone crest [J]. ScientificWorldJournal, 2015, 2015:142108.
[13] 乐迪,张豪,胡文杰,等.牙周探诊法判断牙龈生物型的初步研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2012,47(2):81-84.
[14] Alhajj WA. Gingival phenotypes and their relation to age, gender and other risk factors [J]. BMC Oral Health, 2020, 20(1):87.
[15] Claffey N, Shanley D. Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in shallow sites following nonsurgical periodontal therapy [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 1986, 13(7):654-657.
[16] Amid R, Mirakhori M, Safi Y, et al. Assessment of gingival biotype and facial hard/soft tissue dimensions in the maxillary anterior teeth region using cone beam computed tomography [J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2017, 79:1-6.
[17] Ramírez K, García-Rodríguez O, Murillo-Arocho M, et al. Dentogingival complex: dimension based on biotypes [J]. P R Health Sci J, 2013, 32(4):182-186.
[18] García-Cortés JO, Loyola-Rodríguez JP, Monárrez-Espino J. Gingival biotypes in Mexican students aged 17-19 years old and their associated anatomic structures, socio-demographic and dietary factors [J]. J Oral Sci, 2019, 61(1):156-163.
[19] Kloukos D, Koukos G, Doulis I, et al. Gingival thickness assessment at the mandibular incisors with four methods: A cross-sectional study [J]. J Periodontol, 2018, 89(11):1300-1309.
[20] Rasperini G, Codari M, Paroni L, et al. The influence of gingival phenotype on the outcomes of coronally advanced flap: A prospective multicenter study [J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2019, 40(1):e27-e34.
[21] Lee SP, Kim TI, Kim HK, et al. Discriminant analysis for the thin periodontal biotype based on the data acquired from three-dimensional virtual models of Korean young adults [J]. J Periodontol, 2013, 84(11):1638-1645.
[22] Yin XJ, Wei BY, Ke XP, et al. Correlation between clinical parameters of crown and gingival morphology of anterior teeth and periodontal biotypes [J]. BMC Oral Health, 2020, 20(1):59.
[23] Mandaloy A, Sridhar R, Singh A, et al. Papilla height as an objective parameter to measure gingival biotype [J]. J Dent, 2016, 4:61-65.
[24] Malhotra R, Grover V, Bhardwaj A, et al. Analysis of the gingival biotype based on the measurement of the dentopapillary complex [J]. J Indian Soc Periodontol, 2014, 18(1):43-47.
[25] Seibert J, Lindhe J. Esthetics and periodontal therapy . in: Textbook of Clinical Periodontology[M]. 1989:477-514.
[26] Müller HP, Eger T. Gingival phenotypes in young male adults [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 1997, 24(1):65-71.
[27] De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, et al. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2009, 36(5):428-433.
[28] Maria N, Lazaros T, Christos A, et al. Classification of periodontal biotypes with the use of CBCT. A cross-sectional study [J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2015, 20(8):1-11.

牙龈表型分型的现状与展望

Present Situation and Prospect in the Typing of Gingival Phenotype

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	帕克扎提·色依提, 张磊, 王铁梅, 黄晓峰, 林梓桐, 孙国文. 颌骨牙源性硬化性癌的影像学特征分析及文献复习[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(9): 889-893.
[2]	闫雪丹,张丽娜,任秀云. 前牙区牙龈生物型研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(2): 116-118.
[3]	李红梅,王春,董维理. 61例牙龈瘤的临床特点及疗效分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(11): 1176-1178.