前牙区牙龈生物型研究进展

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.02.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 牙龈生物型是反映患者牙周组织个体化差异的指标之一,前牙区的牙龈生物型常常涉及微笑美学区治疗的预后。近年来临床口腔医师对于前牙区牙龈生物型的研究逐渐增多,不同牙龈生物型患者对于牙周、正畸、修复、种植等多学科治疗过程的效果反馈也不同。本文就其分类、常见临床判定方法以及前牙区生物型的临床意义做一综述。

关键词: 前牙, 牙龈生物型, 牙龈厚度

Abstract: The gingival biotype is one of the indexes to reflect the individualized difference of periodontal tissues, and the gingival biotype in the anterior tooth area often involves the prognosis of the treatment in the smile aesthetic area. In recent years, clinicians pay attention to the gingival biotype in the anterior dentition, and the effects of different gingival biological patients on periodontal, orthodontic, and oral implantology treatment are different. This article reviews the classification of gingival biotype, the common clinical judgment methods and the clinical significance of the anterior dental region.

Key words: Anterior tooth, Gingival biotype, Gingival thickness

闫雪丹,张丽娜,任秀云. 前牙区牙龈生物型研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(2): 116-118.

YAN Xue-dan, ZHANG Li-na, REN Xiu-yun.. A Review of Gingival Biotype in Anterior Tooth Area[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2019, 35(2): 116-118.

参考文献

[1] 苏莎,林璐,宗娟娟.基于冠龈形态特征的牙周表型的分类研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2017,33(5):141-142.
[2] 束蓉.牙周生物型对口腔多学科治疗的影响[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2014,49(3): 129-132.
[3] Vandana KL, Gupta I. The relation of gingival thickness to dynamics of gingival margin position pre- and post-surgically [J]. J Indian Soc Periodonto, 2016, 20(2):167-173.
[4] Amid R, Mirakhori M, Safi Y, et al. Assessment of gingival biotype and facial hard/soft tissue dimensions in the maxillary anterior teeth region using cone beam computed tomography [J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2017, 79:1-6.
[5] Alves PHM, Alves TCLP, Pegoraro TA, et al. Measurement properties of gingival biotype evaluation methods [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018,20(3):280-284.
[6] 乐迪,张豪,胡文杰,等.牙周探诊法判断牙龈生物型的初步研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2012,47(2): 81-84.
[7] 龚寅,谢玉峰,束蓉.上海汉族青年牙龈生物型的 CBCT 检测[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2017,37(8): 1111-1115.
[8] Younes F, Eghbali A, Raes M, et al. Relationship between buccal bone and gingival thickness revisited using non-invasive registration methods [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016, 27(5):523-528.
[9] Kaya Y, Alkan , Keskin S. An evaluation of the gingival biotype and the width of keratinized gingiva in the mandibular anterior region of individuals with different dental malocclusion groups and levels of crowding [J]. Korean J Orthod, 2017,47(3):176-185.
[10] Esfahrood ZR, Kadkhodazadeh M, Ardakani MRT. Gingival biotype: A review [J]. Gen Dent, 2013, 61(4):14-17.
[11] Müller HP, Eger T. Gingival phenotypes in young male adults [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 1997, 24(1):65-71.
[12] Gargiulo AW, Wentz F, Orban F. Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction in humans [J]. J Periodontol, 1961, 32(3): 261-267.
[13] 孟焕新.牙周病学[M].第4版.人民卫生出版社, 2012.21.
[14] 赵宇骁,周延,浦丽飞,等.上颌中切牙牙龈生物型的相关因素分析[J].口腔医学,2017,37(7): 615-620.
[15] Joshi A, Suragimath G, Zope SA, et al. Comparison of gingival biotype between different genders based on measurement of dentopapillary complex [J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2017, 11(9):ZC40-ZC45.
[16] Agarwal V, Sunny, Mehrotra N, et al. Gingival biotype assessment: Variations in gingival thickness with regard to age, gender, and arch location [J]. Indian J Dent Sci ,2017, 9(1): 12.
[17] 施优灵,韩光丽.正畸治疗中的牙龈退缩[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2014, 41(1): 57-62.
[18] 郭钰.骨开窗骨开裂发生率及其相关因素的CBCT研究[D].首都医科大学, 2014.
[19] Evangelista K, Vasconcelos KF, Bumann A, et al. Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with Class Ⅰ and Class Ⅱ Division 1 malocclusion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 138(2):133-135.
[20] Park JH, Hong JY, Ahn HW, et al. Correlation between periodontal soft tissue and hard tissue surrounding incisors in skeletal Class Ⅲ patients [J]. Angle Orthod, 2018, 88(1):91-99.
[21] Rasperini G, Acunzo R, Cannalire P, et al. Influence of periodontal biotype on root surface exposure during orthodontic treatment: a preliminary study [J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2015, 35(5):665-675.
[22] Verdugo F, Uribarri A, D'Addona A. Autogenous bone block grafting provides facial implant tissue stability long-term [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2017, 19(3): 478-485.
[23] Yilmaz HG, T Züm TF. Are gingival phenotype, residual ridge height, and membrane thickness critical for the perforation of maxillary sinus [J]. J Periodontol, 2012, 83(4): 420-425.
[24] 王文君,刘聪慧.在美学区即刻种植中牙龈生物型对红色美学效果的影响[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2015,20(4): 175-178.
[25] Patil VA, Desai MH. Assessment of gingival contours for esthetic diagnosis and treatment: a clinical study [J]. Indian J Dent Res, 2013, 24(3):394-395.
[26] Sin YW, Chang HY, Yun WH, et al. Association of gingival biotype with the results of scaling and root planing [J]. J Periodontal Implant Sci, 2013, 43(6):283-290.
[27] Kahn S, Almeida RA, Dias AT, et al. Clinical considerations on the root coverage of gingival recessions in thin or thick biotype [J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2016, 36(3): 409-415.
[28] Hwang D, Wang HL. Flap thickness as a predictor of root coverage: a systematic review [J]. J Periodontol, 2006, 77(10): 1625-1634.
[29] 乔敏,张凯,董静,等.游离龈瓣移植术和根向复位瓣增加种植区域角化龈效果的临床观察[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2016,51(10): 605-609.
[30] Pontoriero R, Carnevale G. Surgical crown lengthening: a 12-month clinical wound healing study [J]. J Periodontol, 2001, 72(7): 841-848