口腔医学研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 340-343.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.04.010

• 口腔种植学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

探究过预备法对上前牙区即刻种植精度的影响

苏明1, 魏路明2, 吴凯鑫1, 袁长永1,2, 王鹏来1,2*   

  1. 1.徐州医科大学口腔医学院 江苏 徐州 221004;
    2.徐州医科大学附属口腔医院 江苏 徐州 221002
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-18 出版日期:2022-04-28 发布日期:2022-04-22
  • 通讯作者: *王鹏来,E-mail:wpl0771@163.com
  • 作者简介:苏明(1995~ ),男,江苏苏州人,硕士在读,研究方向:数字化技术在口腔临床中的应用。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(编号:81700954)

Effect of Over-preparation Method on Accuracy of Immediate Implantation in Maxillary Anterior Region

SU Ming1, WEI Luming2, WU Kaixin1, YUAN Changyong1,2, WANG Penglai1,2*   

  1. 1. School of Stomatology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221004, China;
    2. Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221002, China
  • Received:2021-10-18 Online:2022-04-28 Published:2022-04-22

摘要: 目的: 研究过预备法对上颌前牙区即刻种植精度的影响。方法: 选择40例上颌前牙区接受即刻种植治疗的患者纳入试验。试验组(n=20)在全程种植导板的引导下进行种植外科手术,并联合使用过预备法对拔牙窝腭侧骨壁进行修整;对照组(n=20)仅在全程种植导板的引导下进行种植外科手术。术中记录各组种植体的初期稳定性及三维位置,术后比较各组种植体实际三维位置与术前规划间的差异。结果: 试验组种植体的颈部偏差为(0.48±0.25) mm、根尖部偏差为(1.05±0.54) mm、角度偏差为(2.09±0.70)°;对照组种植体颈部偏差为(0.68±0.28) mm、根尖偏部差为(2.48±0.50) mm,角度偏差为(4.35±1.19)°。两组种植体的颈部偏差、根尖部偏差、角度偏差间差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组种植体的初期稳定性间差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论: 过预备法能够减小拔牙窝腭侧骨壁对于种植体三维位置的影响,提高上颌前牙区即刻种植的精确度。

关键词: 即刻种植, 种植导板, 种植精度, 三维打印

Abstract: Objective: To study whether over-preparation method can improve the accuracy of implant placement in the maxillary anterior region. Methods: Forty cases (40 implant sites) of immediate implantation were enrolled in this study and divided into two groups (n=20, each group): those who received routine guided implant surgery were control group and those who received implant surgery with over-preparation (OP) method were test group. The insertion torque and the actual position of the dental implant were recorded during the operation. The implant platform, apex, and angle deviations from each of the planned positions were calculated. Results: In the control group, the mean platform, apex, and angulation deviation were (0.68±0.28) mm, (2.48±0.50) mm, and (4.35±1.19)°, respectively. In the test group, the mean platform, apex, and angulation deviation were (0.48±0.25) mm, (1.05±0.54) mm, and (2.09±0.70)°, respectively. There was significant differences between two groups (P<0.05). However, there were not significant difference in the primary stability between two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: The over-preparation method can reduce the influence of palatal bevel of teeth extraction socket and improve immediate implant placement accuracy in the maxillary anterior region.

Key words: dental implant, guided implantation, implant accuracy, 3D print