持续或间断应力加载下正畸微种植体稳定性的组织形态学和生物力学分析

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2016.04.003

口腔医学研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 326-330.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2016.04.003

持续或间断应力加载下正畸微种植体稳定性的组织形态学和生物力学分析

吴也可^1,3*,赵立星^2,3

1. 成都中医大学附属医院口腔科四川成都 610072;
2. 四川大学华西口腔医院正畸科四川成都 610041;
3. 四川大学口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室四川成都 610041

收稿日期:2015-10-14 出版日期:2016-04-28 发布日期:2016-04-28
通讯作者: 吴也可,E-mail:337872366@qq.com
作者简介:吴也可(1987~ ),男,成都人,主治医师,博士,主要从事口腔正畸学临床及基础的研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(编号:81500818)国家自然科学基金(编号:81300876)

Histomorphometric and Biomechanical Analysis of Orthodontic Microscrews Stability under Continuous or Intermittent Force.

WU Ye-ke^1,3*,ZHAO Li-xing^2,3.

1. Department of Stomatology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM, Chengdu 610072, China;
2. Department of Orthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;
3. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China

Received:2015-10-14 Online:2016-04-28 Published:2016-04-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:研究持续或间断应力加载对正畸微种植体稳定性的影响。方法:将144枚微种植体植入36只Beagle犬两侧上颌骨第一磨牙和第二前磨牙根间区域,持续组(n=12)连续加载应力,间断A组(n=12)和B组(n=12)分别以12和24 h为周期间断加载应力。术后1、3、5、7周处死,作显微CT和力学拉拔测试。结果:3组显微CT指标均随时间延长逐渐上升,而Fmax在第5周达峰值,第7周略有下降。在所有时间点,持续组的所有指标均低于两个间断组,且间断组A的各项指标均高于间断组B。结论:间断相比持续应力加载更有利于微种植体稳定性的获得,且12 h的加载周期比24 h更能促进骨-微种植体结合。

关键词: 骨-微种植体结合, 持续应力, 间断应力, 微种植体, 稳定性

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the influence of continuous or intermittent force on stability of titanium microscrews. Methods: 144 microscrews were inserted bilaterally in intraradicular zones of maxillary first molar and second premolar in 36 beagles. Loads were delivered consecutively in continuous group (n=12), in cycles of 12 on/paused for 12h in intermittent group A (n=12), and in cycles of 24 on/paused for 24h in intermittent group B (n=12). The on/off cycles were repeated for 1, 3, 5 or 7 weeks, after which the animals were sacrificed, and microscopic computerized tomography (μCT) and pullout test were applied. Results: The μCT parameters of microscrews in all three groups increased gradually with loading time. Fmax increased and reached a peak at week 5 but dropped slightly at week 7. In continuous group, all measurements were lower than those in intermittent groups at all time points. All values in intermittent group A were higher than those in intermittent group B. Conclusion: An intermittent loading regimen appears to be more favorable for obtaining stability than continuous loading, and a 12 h/12 h on/off loading cycle is superior to a 24 h/24 h on/off protocol in promoting bone-implant contact.

中图分类号:

R783.5

吴也可,赵立星. 持续或间断应力加载下正畸微种植体稳定性的组织形态学和生物力学分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(4): 326-330.

WU Ye-ke,ZHAO Li-xing.. Histomorphometric and Biomechanical Analysis of Orthodontic Microscrews Stability under Continuous or Intermittent Force.[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2016, 32(4): 326-330.

参考文献

[1] Rudy RJ, Levi PA, Bonacci FJ, Weisgold AS, Engler-Hamm D. Intraosseous anchorage of dental prostheses: an early 20th century contribution [J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2008, 29 (4)∶220-222, 224, 226-228
[2] Chambrone L1, Mandia J Jr, Shibli JA, et al. Dental implants installed in irradiated jaws: a systematic review [J]. J Dent Res, 2013, 92(12 Suppl)∶119S-130S
[3] Crismani AG, Bertl MH, Celar AG, et al. Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: review and analysis of published clinical trials [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 137(1)∶108-113
[4] Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Lee JW, et al. Survival analysis of orthodontic mini-implants [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 137(2)∶194-199
[5] Javed F, Romanos GE. The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review [J]. J Dent, 2010, 38(8)∶612-620
[6] 吴欣,刘国元,蒋勇联,等.微种植体支抗矫治高角开牙合病例的临床研究[J].口腔医学研究,2015,31(9)∶923-926
[7] Zhao LX, Xu Z, Yang Z, et al. Quantitative research using computed tomographic scanning of beagle jaws for determination of safe zones for micro-screw implantation [J]. Ann Anat, 2009, 191(4)∶379-388
[8] Zimring JF, Isaacson RJ. Forces produced by rapid maxillary expansion. 3. Forces present during retention [J]. Angle Orthod, 1965, 35∶178-186
[9] Meeran NA. Biological response at the cellular level within the periodontal ligament on application of orthodontic force-An update [J]. J Orthod Sci, 2012, 1(1)∶2-10
[10] Santos AC, Tortamano A, Naccarato SR, et al. An in vitro comparison of the force decay generated by different commercially available elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springs [J]. Braz Oral Res, 2007, 21(1)∶51-57
[11] Saxon LK, Robling AG, Alam I, Turner CH. Mechanosensitivity of the rat skeleton decreases after a long period of loading, but is improved with time off [J]. Bone, 2005, 36(3)∶454-464
[12] Robling AG, Burr DB, Turner CH. Recovery periods restore mechanosensitivity to dynamically loaded bone [J]. J Exp Biol, 2001a, 204(Pt 19)∶3389-99
[13] Srinivasan S, Weimer DA, Agans SC, et al. Low-magnitude mechanical loading becomes osteogenic when rest is inserted between each load cycle [J]. J Bone Miner Res, 2002, 17(9)∶ 1613-20
[14] Kumasako-Haga T, Konoo T, Yamaguchi K, et al. Effect of 8-hour intermittent orthodontic force on osteoclasts and root resorption [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009, 135(3)∶278.e1-8
[15] Kim SH, Choi BH, Li JX, et al. Peri-implant bone reactions at delayed and immediately loaded implants: an experimental study [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008, 105(2)∶144-148

持续或间断应力加载下正畸微种植体稳定性的组织形态学和生物力学分析

Histomorphometric and Biomechanical Analysis of Orthodontic Microscrews Stability under Continuous or Intermittent Force.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	丘雨蓓, 郭伟忠, 陈江. 较大载荷下加载时机对正畸微种植钉骨结合的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(5): 480-482.
[2]	吴也可,赵立星,郜然然. 植入角度对微种植体稳定性的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(2): 172-175.
[3]	刘海燕,荆璇,李冰,HEE-Moon,Kyung,李世锋,武秀萍. 直丝化舌侧矫治不同微种植体高度内收上前牙的生物力学分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(2): 180-184.
[4]	吕曜光, 宋志强, 贾梦莹, 邵博, 曾雪敏, 龚忠诚. 3种方法治疗颞下颌关节滑膜炎的疗效评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(12): 1149-1152.
[5]	韦回, 韦佳黛, 邓端耀, 朱思婷, 陈库, 莫水学. 微种植体支抗下成人安氏Ⅱ¹类高角患者后牙合平面的变化研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(11): 1062-1065.
[6]	张颖, 符策广, 卢锦芬, 张清彬. 两种咬合板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的临床疗效评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(3): 294-297.
[7]	庞琴, 王超, 马小娟, 杜全高, 吴婷婷, 付钢. IT与ISQ能反映种植体初期稳定性吗[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(2): 150-153.
[8]	马国武,郑胜. rhTNFR:Fc对兔正畸微种植体周围炎骨结合影响的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(9): 916-919.
[9]	张玲阁,张睿,李喜红,丁文生,刘军. 透明质酸钠关节腔注射联合牙合垫治疗不可复性关节盘前移位的疗效评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(8): 865-868.
[10]	刘承灵, 王军, 任卫萍, 周瑞, 栗震亚. 腭骨厚度CBCT与头颅定位测量值的相关性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(3): 297-300.
[11]	邵雯婷, 王学金. 正畸微种植体支抗稳定性研究方法现状[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(10): 1106-1109.
[12]	吴欣,刘国元,蒋勇联,季玉花,杨沛蕾,叶彩. 微种植体支抗矫治高角开牙合病例的临床研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(9): 923-925.