不同部位牵张成骨术对颞下颌关节影响的研究进展

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.09.004

口腔医学研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 936-938.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.09.004

不同部位牵张成骨术对颞下颌关节影响的研究进展

皮纳¹,侯敏^2*

1. 天津医科大学天津 300070;
2. 天津市口腔医院正颌外科天津 300041

收稿日期:2017-12-12 出版日期:2018-09-28 发布日期:2018-09-25
通讯作者: 侯敏,E-mail:houmin8181@sina.com
作者简介:皮纳(1994~ ),湖北咸宁人 ,硕士,主要从事正颌外科基础与临床研究。
基金资助:
天津市卫生局科技基金(编号:2013KR11)

Research Progress on Effect of Different Lengthening Areas on the Temporomandibular Joint.

PI Na¹,HOU Min^2*.

1.Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China;
2.Department of Orthognathic Surgery, Tianjin Stomatological Hospital, Tianjin 300041, China.

Received:2017-12-12 Online:2018-09-28 Published:2018-09-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着牵张成骨术适应症的不断扩大,牵张成骨被认为是治疗先天或后天性颌面部缺损的有效手段。由于颞下颌关节与牵引的下颌骨段是一个整体,在牵张成骨过程中,持续的牵引力会传递到颞下颌关节,对其产生不同的影响,然而在不同部位牵张成骨时,髁突所受应力大小和方向却并不尽相同,因此本文将对不同部位牵张成骨对颞下颌关节的影响进行综述。

关键词: 牵张成骨, 颞下颌关节, 髁突, 特发性髁突吸收

Abstract: With the expansion on the indications of distraction osteogenesis (DO), DO is thought to be the effective treatment of congenital or acquired maxillofacial defect. Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and the tractive bone segments are an entirety. During the course of jaw DO, the continuous traction will load on the TMJ, which causes different changes of TMJ. However, the magnitude and direction of the pressures on the condyle are changed with difference parts of mindible. This article will review the effect of different lengthening areas on the TMJ.

Key words: Distraction osteogenesis, Temporomandibular joint, Condyle, Idiopathic condylar resorption

皮纳,侯敏. 不同部位牵张成骨术对颞下颌关节影响的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(9): 936-938.

PI Na,HOU Min.. Research Progress on Effect of Different Lengthening Areas on the Temporomandibular Joint.[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2018, 34(9): 936-938.

参考文献

[1] Mccarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, et al. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction [J] . Plast Reconstr Surg,1992, 89(1)∶1-8, 9-10
[2] Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device [J] . J Craniofac Surg,1997,8(3)∶181-185, 186
[3] Mihmanlí A, Dolanmaz D, Tüz H, et al. Histomorphometric examination of long-term changes in temporomandibular joints after mandibular lengthening by distraction osteogenesis in rabbits [J] . Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol,2012,113(5)∶600-603
[4] Andersen K, Pedersen TK, Hauge EM, et al. Effect of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on the temporomandibular joint: a systematic review of animal experimental studies [J] . Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol,2014,117(4)∶407-415
[5] Kim KN, Cha BK, Choi DS, et al. A finite element study on the effects of midsymphyseal distraction osteogenesis on the mandible and articular disc [J] . Angle Orthod,2012,82(3)∶464-471
[6] Orhan M, Malkoc S, Usumez S, et al. Mandibular symphyseal distraction and its geometrical evaluation: report of a case [J] . Angle Orthod,2003,73(2)∶194-200
[7] Harper RP, Bell WH, Hinton RJ, et al. Reactive changes in the temporomandibular joint after mandibular midline osteodistraction [J] . Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1997,35(1)∶20-25
[8] Guerrero CA, Bell WH, Contasti GI, et al. Mandibular widening by intraoral distraction osteogenesis [J] . Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1997,35(6)∶383-392
[9] Kewitt GF, van Sickels JE. Long-term effect of mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis on the status of the temporomandibular joint, teeth, periodontal structures, and neurosensory function [J] . J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1999,57(12)∶1419-1425, 1426
[10] Landes CA, Laudemann K, Sader R, et al. Prospective changes to condylar position in symphyseal distraction osteogenesis [J] . Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2008,106(2)∶163-172
[11] Katada H, Arakawa T, Ichimura K, et al. Stress distribution in mandible and temporomandibular joint by mandibular distraction: a 3-dimensional finite-element analysis [J] . Bull Tokyo Dent Coll,2009,50(4)∶161-168
[12] 李长健,孙一丹,李岩峰,等.单侧不完全截骨牵张时颞下颌关节位移的有限元研究[J] .临床口腔医学杂志,2017,33(2)∶72-75
[13] Zhu S, Hu J, Zou S, et al. Biomechanical properties of the condyle created by osteodistraction [J] . J Dent Res,2008,87(5)∶490-494
[14] Elgazzar RF, El-Bialy TH, Megahed E. Effect of bilateral mandibular osteodistration on the condylar cartilage: an experimental study on rabbits [J] . Open Dent J,2008,2(1)∶103-108
[15] Kim S, Ha J, Park J. Histological changes in the temporomandibular joint in rabbits depending on the extent of mandibular lengthening by osteodistraction [J] . Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2004,42(6)∶559-565
[16] Ahn SY, Kim SG. Condylar cartilaginous changes after mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits [J] . Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2011,112(4)∶416-422
[17] van Strijen PJ, Breuning KH, Becking AG, et al. Condylar resorption following distraction osteogenesis: A case report [J] . J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2001,59(9)∶1104-1107
[18] Thurmüller P, Troulis MJ, Rosenberg A, et al. Microscopic changes in the condyle and disc in response to distraction osteogenesis of the minipig mandible [J] . J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2006,64(2)∶249-258
[19] McCormick SU, Grayson BH, Mccarthy JG, et al. Effect of mandibular distraction on the temporomandibular joint: Part 2, Clinical study [J] . J Craniofac Surg,1995,6(5)∶364-367
[20] Karaharju-Suvanto T, Peltonen J, Laitinen O, et al. The effect of gradual distraction of the mandible on the sheep temporomandibular joint [J] . Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1996,25(2)∶152-156
[21] Li P, Long J, Tang W, et al. Stress distribution on the mandibular condyle and the distraction area in distraction osteogenesis by finite element analysis [J] . J Craniofac Surg,2013,24(3)∶1031-1037
[22] Mackool RL, Shetye P, Grayson B,et al. Distraction osteogenesis in a patient with juvenile arthritis [J] . J Craniofac Surg,2006,90(17)∶387-390
[23] N rholt SE, Pedersen TK, Herlin T. Functional changes following distraction osteogenesis treatment of asymmetric mandibular growth deviation in unilateral juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a prospective study with long-term follow-up [J] . Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2013,42(3)∶329-336
[24] Andersen K, Pedersen TK, Svendsen P, et al. Effect of unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis on mandibular morphology in rabbits with antigen-induced temporomandibular joint arthritis [J] . Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2015,44(8)∶1052-1059
[25] 薛晓晨,李彪,孙昊,等.下颌双侧体部牵引成骨联合上颌手术辅助快速扩弓治疗双侧髁突自溶性吸收继发重度骨性Ⅱ类错牙合畸形伴上牙弓狭窄的效果[J] .中国口腔颌面外科杂志,2017,15(2)∶165-170

不同部位牵张成骨术对颞下颌关节影响的研究进展

Research Progress on Effect of Different Lengthening Areas on the Temporomandibular Joint.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	何峰, 于世宾. 程序性坏死在颞下颌关节骨关节炎软骨退变中的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(1): 15-18.
[2]	马文, 韦意, 陆琳, 付帅, 张长彬, 崔庆赢, 彭灿邦, 王立冬, 许艳华, 黎明. 多类型数字影像拟合及3D打印技术在髁突肿瘤中的运用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(1): 81-86.
[3]	王冬香, 王光素, 唐正龙, 陈友利, 高琼, 安宁. 下颌骨髁突高位骨折游离复位愈合过程中DKK-1/BMP-2的表达研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(8): 748-752.
[4]	王珈璐, 张卫兵. 牵张力作用下小鼠颅骨缝成骨的定量分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(8): 753-756.
[5]	涂文星, 冯云霞. 下颌支矢状骨劈开术对颞下颌关节影响的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(6): 516-518.
[6]	刘培红, 马肃, 李永恒, 王海侠. 细胞外基质蛋白DMP1-C和DMP1-N在咬合创伤治疗前后大鼠髁突软骨内的差异表达[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(5): 443-448.
[7]	张颖, 冯梓峻. 基于CBCT下颞下颌关节造影的关节盘穿孔与髁突骨质改变相关性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(4): 333-336.
[8]	邹道星, 王增全, 卢钰. 咬合干扰与颞下颌关节紊乱病的相关性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(4): 337-340.
[9]	胡智慧, 房维. 高迁移率族蛋白1在颞下颌关节骨关节炎中的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(12): 1099-1102.
[10]	刘更, 李乐, 邢路, 范向飞. 肾上腺素受体信号在磨牙异常咬合致大鼠髁突软骨下骨丢失中的作用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(1): 28-32.
[11]	许颖捷,邵博,贾梦莹,辜文妍,龚忠诚. 后牙锁牙合与颞下颌关节紊乱病的相关性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(6): 578-582.
[12]	李菁,龙星,林妍华,刘海鹏,周建平. 颞下颌关节骨关节病3种保守治疗的锥形束CT评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(6): 583-586.
[13]	程慧娜, 周青. 下颌骨特发性髁突吸收的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(5): 427-429.
[14]	徐凡, 周青. 下颌骨特发性髁突吸收的认识和争议[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(5): 430-432.
[15]	李德超, 王心彧. 基于牵张成骨骨增量的种植前外科探讨[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(4): 313-315.