不同牙龈表型影响牙周组织再生术临床疗效的回顾性研究

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2024.02.004

口腔医学研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 113-117.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2024.02.004

不同牙龈表型影响牙周组织再生术临床疗效的回顾性研究

傅俊博^1,2, 笪海芹^1,2,3*, 周占豪^1,2, 陶珊悦^1,2, 陈莹³

1.安徽医科大学合肥口腔临床学院安徽合肥 230001;
2.安徽医科大学第五临床医学院安徽合肥 230001;
3.合肥市口腔医院安徽合肥 230001

收稿日期:2023-07-28 出版日期:2024-02-28 发布日期:2024-02-26
通讯作者: *笪海芹,E-mail:dhq1028@163.com
作者简介:傅俊博(1997~ ),男,江西新余人,医师,硕士在读,主要从事牙周病学临床研究。
基金资助:
2021年合肥市关键共性技术研发和重大科技成果工程化立项项目(2021YL008) 2022年安徽医科大学校科研基金立项资助项目(2022xkj255)

Retrospective Study of the Effect of Different Gingival Phenotypes on Clinical Efficacy of Periodontal Tissue Regeneration Surgery

FU Junbo^1,2, DA Haiqin^1,2,3*, ZHOU Zhanhao^1,2, TAO Shanyue^1,2, CHEN Ying³

1. Hefei School of Stomatology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230001, China;
2. Fifth Clinical College, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230001, China;
3. Hefei Stomatological Hospital, Hefei 230001, China

Received:2023-07-28 Online:2024-02-28 Published:2024-02-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:评价牙龈表型对牙周组织再生术后临床疗效的影响。方法:选取需行牙周组织再生术的患者30例,患牙共40颗,薄龈型与厚龈型患牙各20颗。术前及术后6个月记录患牙的探诊深度(probing depth,PD)、牙龈退缩深度(gingival recession depth,GRD)、临床附着丧失(clinical attachment loss,CAL)以及角化龈宽度(keratinized tissue width,KTW)并进行对比分析。结果:厚龈型组患牙术后6个月的PD、CAL、KTW与术前相比差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05),薄龈型组患牙术后6个月的PD、GRD、CAL与术前相比差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05);组间比较两组术前与术后6个月临床指标变化量中ΔCAL、ΔGRD、ΔKTW差异均具有统计学意义(P＜0.05);相关性分析表明牙龈厚度(gingiva thickness,GT)与ΔGRD呈负相关,与ΔKTW和ΔCAL呈正相关。结论:牙龈表型是影响牙周组织再生术临床疗效的重要因素,厚龈型患者术后CAL的改善、KTW的增量及GRD 的预后优于薄龈型患者。

关键词: 牙龈表型, 牙周组织再生术, 角化龈宽度, 牙龈退缩

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effect of gingival phenotype on clinical efficacy after periodontal tissue regeneration surgery by analyzing relevant clinical indexes. Methods: Thirty patients who need periodontal tissue regeneration surgery were selected, with a total of 40 affected teeth, including 20 thin gingival type and 20 thick gingival type each. The probing depth (PD), gingival recession depth (GRD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), and keratinized tissue width (KTW) of the affected teeth were recorded and compared before and 6 months after surgery. Results: In the thick gingival type group, there were statistically significant differences in the PD, CAL, and KTW at 6 months after surgery in contrast to before surgery (P<0.05). In the thin gingival type group, there were statistically significant differences in the PD, GRD, and CAL at 6 months after surgery in contrast to before surgery (P<0.05). There was statistically significant difference in the changes of ΔCAL, ΔGRD, and ΔKTW before and 6 months after surgery between thin gingival type and thick gingival type groups (P<0.05). Correlation analysis showed that gingiva thickness (GT) was negatively correlated with ΔGRD, and positively correlated with ΔKTW and ΔCAL. Conclusion: Gingival phenotype is an important factor affecting the clinical efficacy of periodontal tissue regeneration surgery. The improvement of CAL, the increase of KTW, and the prognosis of GRD in patients with thick gingival type were better than those with thin gingival type.

Key words: gingival phenotype, periodontal regenerative surgery, keratinized tissue width, gingival recession

傅俊博, 笪海芹, 周占豪, 陶珊悦, 陈莹. 不同牙龈表型影响牙周组织再生术临床疗效的回顾性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2024, 40(2): 113-117.

FU Junbo, DA Haiqin, ZHOU Zhanhao, TAO Shanyue, CHEN Ying. Retrospective Study of the Effect of Different Gingival Phenotypes on Clinical Efficacy of Periodontal Tissue Regeneration Surgery[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2024, 40(2): 113-117.

参考文献

[1] Fine DH, Patil AG, Loos BG. Classification and diagnosis of aggressive periodontitis [J]. J Periodontol, 2018, 89 Suppl 1:S103-S119.
[2] Sallum EA, Ribeiro FV, Ruiz KS, et al. Experimental and clinical studies on regenerative periodontal therapy [J]. Periodontol 2000, 2019, 79(1):22-55.
[3] 石宇彤,王翠,胡文杰,等.运用牙周再生性手术及翻瓣骨成形术治疗牙周炎的临床效果观察(附1例报告)[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2020,13(3):130-138.
[4] Cheng J, Cheng L, Kong L, et al. Clinical observation of porcine collagen membrane + artificial bovine bone granules guided tissue regeneration combined with autologous CGF in the treatment of severe periodontitis bone defect [J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2023, 39(3):710-714.
[5] Anderegg CR, Metzler DG, Nicoll BK. Gingiva thickness in guided tissue regeneration and associated recession at facial furcation defects [J]. J Periodontol, 1995, 66(5):397-402.
[6] Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM, et al. Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions [J]. J Periodontol, 2018, 89 Suppl 1:S237-S248.
[7] Malpartida Carrillo V, Tinedo Lopez PL, Guerrero ME, et al. Periodontal phenotype: A review of historical and current classifications evaluating different methods and characteristics [J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2021, 33(3):432-445.
[8] Kim DM, Bassir SH, Nguyen TT. Effect of gingival phenotype on the maintenance of periodontal health: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review [J]. J Periodontol, 2020, 91(3):311-338.
[9] Huang LH, Neiva RE, Soehren SE, et al. The effect of platelet-rich plasma on the coronally advanced flap root coverage procedure: a pilot human trial [J]. J Periodontol, 2005, 76(10):1768-1777.
[10] Kan JY, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement [J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2010, 30(3):237-243.
[11] Shaikh MS, Pisani F, De Vito D, et al. Long-term clinical performance of regeneration versus conservative surgery in the treatment of infra-bony defects:A systematic review [J]. J Int Acad Periodontol, 2021, 23(1):31-56.
[12] Batista EJ, Novaes AJ, Simonpietri JJ, et al. Use of bovine-derived anorganic bone associated with guided tissue regeneration in intrabony defects. Six-month evaluation at re-entry [J]. J Periodontol, 1999, 70(9):1000-1007.
[13] Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Clinical concepts for regenerative therapy in intrabony defects [J]. Periodontology 2000, 2015, 68(1):282-307.
[14] Tonetti MS, Prato GP, Cortellini P. Factors affecting the healing response of intrabony defects following guided tissue regeneration and access flap surgery [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 1996, 23(6):548-556.
[15] Górski B, Kaczyski T, Miskiewicz A, et al. Early postoperative healing following guided tissue regeneration in aggressive periodontitis patients [J]. Dent Med Probl, 2018, 55(3):289-297.
[16] 杨大国,任秀云.牙龈表型分型的现状与展望[J].口腔医学研究,2022,38(1):20-23.
[17] 陈子圆,钟金晟,欧阳翔英,等.牙龈退缩患牙的牙龈厚度评估[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2020,52(2):339-345.
[18] Kim Y, Park J, Jang Y, et al. Accuracy of periodontal probe visibility in the assessment of gingival thickness [J]. J Periodontal Implant Sci, 2021, 51(1):30-39.
[19] 张薇,赵万民,郑亚飞,等.牙周表型的分类、测量及临床意义[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2021,37(3):414-418.
[20] Hwang D, Wang H. Flap thickness as a predictor of root coverage: A systematic review [J]. J Periodontol, 2006, 77(10):1625-1634.
[21] Levine RA, Saleh MHA, Dias DR, et al. Periodontal regeneration risk assessment in the treatment of intrabony defects [J]. Clin Adv Periodontics, 2023.
[22] Fischer KR, Künzlberger A, Donos N, et al. Gingival biotype revisited-novel classification and assessment tool [J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2018, 22(1):443-448.
[23] Gonçalves Motta SH, Ferreira Camacho MP, Quintela DC, et al. Relationship between clinical and histologic periodontal biotypes in humans [J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2017, 37(5):737-741.
[24] Le NM, Song S, Zhou H, et al. A noninvasive imaging and measurement using optical coherence tomography angiography for the assessment of gingiva: An in vivo study [J]. J Biophotonics, 2018, 11(12):e201800242.
[25] Vlachodimou E, Fragkioudakis I, Vouros I. Is there an association between the gingival phenotype and the width of keratinized gingiva? A systematic review [J]. Dent J (Basel), 2021, 9(3):34.

不同牙龈表型影响牙周组织再生术临床疗效的回顾性研究

Retrospective Study of the Effect of Different Gingival Phenotypes on Clinical Efficacy of Periodontal Tissue Regeneration Surgery

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	柯晓菁, 周伟, 李艳芬, 谭葆春, 李厚轩. 角化龈增宽术的角化龈宽度测量分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(12): 1063-1068.
[2]	蔡松梅, 汪涌. CGF辅助治疗MillerⅠ类牙龈退缩的临床评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(12): 1069-1074.
[3]	杨柯, 宋倩, 傅亚婷, 刘华. 基于锥体束CT分析上颌窦黏膜厚度与牙周组织特征的相关性[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(12): 1075-1079.
[4]	杨大国, 任秀云. 牙龈表型分型的现状与展望[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(1): 20-23.
[5]	刘冬晓, 夏连松, 黄川. 软组织移植用于治疗正畸后牙龈退缩的临床疗效分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(8): 708-711.
[6]	张慧慧, 李明丽, 李成章. 侧向转位瓣结合上皮下结缔组织移植治疗重度Miller Ⅲ°牙龈退缩1例[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(5): 572-574.
[7]	朱妍菲,谢玉峰. 牙龈生物型的特点及其临床意义[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(9): 945-948.
[8]	赵小珩, 孟柳燕, 边专. 大鼠牙龈退缩模型的建立[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(6): 564-567.