口腔医学研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 1069-1074.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2023.12.008

• 牙周病学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

CGF辅助治疗MillerⅠ类牙龈退缩的临床评价

蔡松梅1,2, 汪涌1,2,3*   

  1. 1.安徽医科大学合肥口腔临床学院 安徽 合肥 230061;
    2.安徽医科大学第五临床医学院 安徽 合肥 230032;
    3.合肥市口腔医院牙周黏膜科 安徽 合肥 230001
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-14 出版日期:2023-12-28 发布日期:2023-12-25
  • 通讯作者: * 汪涌,E-mail:yllwywzy@126.com
  • 作者简介:蔡松梅(1997~ ),女,安徽宣城人,硕士在读,医师,主要研究方向为牙周病学。
  • 基金资助:
    2023年合肥市口腔医院院级重点科研项目(院科教[2023]26号)合肥市第六周期医学重点专科建设项目(合卫科教[2019]160号)

Clinical Evaluation of CGF Assisted Treatment of Miller Class Ⅰ Gingival Recession

CAI Songmei1,2, WANG Yong1,2,3*   

  1. 1. Hefei College of Stomatology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230061, China;
    2. The Fifth Clinical Medical School, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China;
    3. Department of Periodontics and Disease of Oral Mucosa, Hefei Stomatological Hospital, Hefei 230001, China
  • Received:2023-07-14 Online:2023-12-28 Published:2023-12-25

摘要: 目的:评估浓缩生长因子(concentrate growth factors,CGF)作为辅助性材料联合冠向复位瓣(coronally advanced flap,CAF)与结缔组织移植(connective tissue graft,CTG),治疗MillerⅠ类牙龈退缩(gingival recession,GR)的临床疗效。方法:将30例MillerⅠ类GR患者(共计42个GR位点)视为本研究试验对象,随机分为试验组(CAF+CTG+CGF)和对照组(CAF+CTG),每组15例,比较两组患者的术后效应。结果:术后6个月,比较试验组和对照组牙龈退缩高度和宽度的减少、角化龈宽度的增加及术后24 h、2 d及7 d的数字评价量表(用以评估术后疼痛肿胀情况)评分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。完全根面覆盖率,试验组(90.90%)和对照组(65.00%)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:CGF作为CAF+CTG的辅助性材料运用于Miller Ⅰ类GR中,可以减少术后6个月的牙龈退缩高度及宽度,增加角化龈宽度,改善术后24 h、2 d及7 d的疼痛肿胀情况,为GR治疗开拓了新思路。

关键词: 牙龈退缩, 浓缩生长因子, 结缔组织移植物, 冠向复位瓣

Abstract: Objective: To estimate the effectiveness of concentrate growth factors (CGF) combined with connective tissue graft (CTG) and coronally advanced flap (CAF) for the treatment of Miller Class Ⅰ gingival recession (GR). Methods: Thirty GR patients with Miller Class Ⅰ (42 sites) were selected and randomly divided into experimental group (CAF+CTG+CGF) and control group (CAF+CTG), with 15 cases in each group. The postoperative effects of the two groups were compared. Results: Six months after operation, the decrease of gingival recession height and width, the increase of keratinized tissue width, and the score of numerical rating scale (used to estimate postoperative pain and swelling) at 24 h, 2 d, and 7 d after surgery were statistically significant (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the complete root coverage between experimental group (90.90%) and control group (65.00%, P>0.05). Conclusion: CGF, as an auxiliary material for CAF+CTG, can reduce the height and width of gingival recession 6 months after surgery, increase the keratinized tissue width, and ameliorate the pain and swelling at 24 h, 2 d, and 7 d after surgery, which opens up a new idea for the treatment of GR.

Key words: gingival recession, concentrate growth factors, connective tissue graft, coronally advanced flap