圆领瓣在上颌完全埋伏阻生智齿拔除术中的应用

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.10.014

口腔医学研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10): 927-930.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.10.014

圆领瓣在上颌完全埋伏阻生智齿拔除术中的应用

白云飞¹, 刘克², 周小程^3*

1.武汉大学口腔医学院口腔医学基础科学国家重点实验室培育基地(湖北)口腔医学教育部重点实验室湖北武汉 430079;
2.武汉大学口腔医院口腔颌面头颈肿瘤外科湖北武汉 430079;
3.武汉大学口腔医院口腔颌面外科湖北武汉 430079

收稿日期:2021-02-23 出版日期:2021-10-28 发布日期:2021-10-18
通讯作者: *周小程,E-mail:zhouxiaocheng@whu.edu.cn
作者简介:白云飞(1995~ ),男,河南正阳人,住院医师,硕士在读,研究方向:智齿微创拔除与舒适化拔除、口腔肿瘤的外科治疗。
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(编号:2042020kf0176)

Application of Round Collar Flap in Maxillary Completely Impacted Wisdom Tooth Extraction

BAI Yunfei¹, LIU Ke², ZHOU Xiaocheng^3*

1. The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) & Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;
2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;
3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China

Received:2021-02-23 Online:2021-10-28 Published:2021-10-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:探讨改良翻瓣术式“圆领瓣”在拔除上颌完全埋伏阻生智齿中的应用效果。方法:选取2020年6月~2020年12月在武汉大学口腔医院口腔外科门诊接受上颌完全埋伏阻生智齿拔除术的患者70例,根据随机数表法分为观察组与对照组,每组35例。观察组采用“圆领瓣”翻瓣术,对照组采用传统角形瓣。比较两组切口缝合时间及拔牙创愈合情况。结果:观察组和对照组患者的愈合情况没有显著差异,观察组的切口缝合时间明显少于对照组。结论:与传统角形瓣相比,“圆领瓣”翻瓣术龈瓣缝合容易,线结易于拆除且不易遗漏,拔牙创愈合效果与传统翻瓣术式没有显著差异,值得在临床上推广应用。

关键词: 上颌第三磨牙, 拔牙, 切口设计, 圆领瓣

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effects of "round collar flap" in the removal of completely impacted maxillary wisdom teeth. Methods: A total of 70 patients with maxillary impacted wisdom teeth were selected in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Stomatological Hospital of Wuhan University from June 2020 to December 2020. According to random number table method, they were divided into observation group and control group, with 35 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with "round collar flap", while the control group was treated with traditional angular flap. The incision suture time and wound healing were compared between two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in the wound healing between both groups, however, the incision suturing time of observation group was significantly shorter than that of control group. Conclusion: Compared with traditional angle flap, wound of "round collar flap" is easier to suture, and the knot of "round collar flap" is easier to remove and is harder to omit.

Key words: maxillary third molar, tooth extraction, flap design, round collar flaps

白云飞, 刘克, 周小程. 圆领瓣在上颌完全埋伏阻生智齿拔除术中的应用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(10): 927-930.

BAI Yunfei, LIU Ke, ZHOU Xiaocheng. Application of Round Collar Flap in Maxillary Completely Impacted Wisdom Tooth Extraction[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(10): 927-930.

参考文献

[1] 许朗,鲁大鹏.基于CBCT影像的阻生第三磨牙分类探讨[J].北京口腔医学, 2018,26(4):210-215.
[2] Sigron GR, Pourmand PP, Mache B, et al. The most common complications after wisdom-tooth removal: part 1: a retrospective study of 1,199 cases in the mandible [J]. Swiss Dent J, 2014,124(10):1042-1046, 1052-1056.
[3] Ali A, Shah SJ, Shah AA, et al. Comparison of comma incision with Ward's incision in third molar extraction in terms of postoperative sequel-A clinical study [J]. Natl J Maxillofac Surg, 2019,10(2):200-205.
[4] Erdogan O, Tatli U, Ustun Y, et al. Influence of two different flap designs on the sequelae of mandibular third molar surgery [J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 15(3):147-152.
[5] Laskin DM. Indications and contraindications for removal of impacted third molars [J]. Dent Clin North Am, 1969, 13(4):919-928.
[6] Allen DZ, Sethia R, Hamersley E, et al. Presentation of an iatrogenically displaced third molar into the maxillary sinus in a 14-year-old patient successfully removed with an endoscopic approach: a case report and a review of the literature [J]. J Surg Case Rep, 2020, 2020(10):a290.
[7] Nogueira E, Almeida R, Catunda IS, et al. Impacted maxillary third molar displaced to the infratemporal space: a critical review and case report [J]. Gen Dent, 2019,67(1):16-20.
[8] Battisti A, Priore P, Giovannetti F, et al. Rare complication in third maxillary molar extraction: dislocation in infratemporal fossa [J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2017, 28(7):1784-1785.
[9] Mace T, Kahn A, Dechaufour P, et al. An extremely rare case of a displaced third molar into the infratemporal fossa associated with a textiloma [J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 121(6):746-748.
[10] 张钰芳.上颌骨埋伏阻生第三磨牙微创拔除的临床研究[J].中外医学研究,2019,17(33):21-23.
[11] 潘韦霖,曹钰彬,刘畅,等.不同翻瓣设计对下颌第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛的影响:系统评价与Meta分析[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志,2019,46(2):142-148.
[12] Barone A, Marconcini S, Giacomelli L, et al. A randomized clinical evaluation of ultrasound bone surgery versus traditional rotary instruments in lower third molar extraction [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010, 68(2):330-336.
[13] Briguglio F, Zenobio EG, Isola G, et al. Complications in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars in relation to flap design: clinical and statistical evaluations [J]. Quintessence Int, 2011, 42(6):445-453.
[14] Karaca I, Simsek S, Ugar D, et al. Review of flap design influence on the health of the periodontium after mandibular third molar surgery [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2007, 104(1):18-23.
[15] 商维荣,朱建华,熊蓉艳,等.腭大孔与牙槽孔的应用解剖学研究[J].黑龙江医药科学,2003,26(2):35.

圆领瓣在上颌完全埋伏阻生智齿拔除术中的应用

Application of Round Collar Flap in Maxillary Completely Impacted Wisdom Tooth Extraction

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	徐涛, 李丽曼, 刘云松, 危伊萍, 胡文杰. 重度牙周炎磨牙拔除运用微翻瓣位点保存术后种植修复效果短期观察[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(3): 264-268.
[2]	黄巧艳, 胡砚平. 下颌埋伏亲吻磨牙微创拔除1例[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(9): 887-888.
[3]	胡涌昕, 张雨慧, 廖婷, 邹瑞, 周丽斌. 阻生齿拔除车针误吞1例[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(7): 703-704.
[4]	朱李军, 李俊, 王书琴, 江穂, 王启朋, 冯航. 抗凝患者拔牙采用肝素桥接与维持抗凝两种方法的效果对比[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(6): 554-557.
[5]	耿双双, 王健, 杨莉, 冯欣欣, 路立花. 位点保存对牙周病患者牙周状况影响的临床研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(11): 1022-1026.
[6]	李娟, 张栋, 康壮飞, 张宁, 谷建琦. 阻生上颌第三磨牙拔除术后上颌第二磨牙远端的牙周变化[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(11): 1027-1030.
[7]	王雪涛, 李璁, 李向春, 李芳凝. CBCT对下颌第三磨牙手术术式选择的影响作用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(1): 33-36.
[8]	乔星, 张士珑, 康文静, 刘春艳, 胡骁颖, 卢海燕. 骨性Ⅰ类高角拔牙后上气道变化的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(9): 858-862.
[9]	崔庆赢, 陈思宇, 付帅, 张长彬, 马文, 黎明. 鼻底入路拔除上颌中切牙区高位埋伏多生牙[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(7): 686-689.
[10]	张玺,王翔,王林,谷妍,吴可,赵春洋. 前牙深覆盖伴单颗下中切牙先天缺失患者不同拔牙模式疗效的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(9): 956-959.
[11]	罗正文, 刘济远, 李佳, 潘剑. 引导组织再生生物膜应用于拔牙术后牙槽骨缺损修复的临床研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(7): 782-786.
[12]	文珊辉,黄兰柱,林梓桐,韩超,王铁梅. CBCT对不同年龄组间下颌第三磨牙拔除风险的评估[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(5): 516-519.
[13]	张建云,李贵凤,胡小蓓,雷浪. Tip-Edge Plus与Damon托槽对拔牙病例前牙转矩控制的比较[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(5): 546-549.
[14]	李向军,张晓燕,张晓,刘宇,张旭东. 2种微动力系统应用于下颌低位阻生智齿拔除术的比较研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(5): 554-558.
[15]	张雨，林赳，高巍，胡懿，高一，熊文碧，潘剑. 大豆苷元对骨质疏松模型大鼠拔牙后牙槽窝骨修复的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(3): 258-261.