口腔医学研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 339-343.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.04.014

• 口腔修复学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

快速烧结系统对氧化锆机械性能的影响

李一帆1, 周志伟1, 汪振华1,2*   

  1. 1.石河子大学医学院 新疆 石河子 832000;
    2.乌鲁木齐市口腔医院修复科 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830000
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-25 发布日期:2021-04-15
  • 通讯作者: *汪振华,E-mail:670952885@qq.com
  • 作者简介:李一帆(1995~ ),女,山东人,硕士,住院医师,研究方向:口腔修复与种植学。
  • 基金资助:
    自治区区域协同专项(编号:2019E0279)

Effect of Speed Sintering System on Mechanical Properties of Zirconia

LI Yifan1, ZHOU Zhiwei1, WANG Zhenhua1,2*   

  1. 1. College of Medicine, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China;
    2. Department of Prosthodontic, Urumqi Stomatological Hospital, Urumqi 830000, China
  • Received:2020-11-25 Published:2021-04-15

摘要: 目的: 探讨常规烧结条件下满足齿科氧化锆机械性能要求的试件,在快速烧结条件下密度、显气孔率、维氏硬度、挠曲强度值等的改变。方法: 采用二次烧结法制备试件。预烧结制得22个试件,其中8个长条形,14个圆片状。将两种不同形状预烧结素坯随机均分为快速烧结组 (SS) 与常规烧结组 (CS) 进行终烧结,排除严重变形试件后,通过相关检测比较两种烧结系统对自制试件密度、显气孔率、维氏硬度、挠曲强度值等的影响。结果: 两种终烧结方法制备试件密度无显著差异(P>0.05) 。快速烧结组维氏硬度值略高且结果具有统计学意义(P<0.05),但其显气孔率高于常规烧结组,挠曲强度值略低于常规烧结组且结果具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。表面形貌表征可见快速烧结组制备的试件晶粒更细小,但相比常规烧结组试件晶粒排列不够均匀,且可见气孔。结论: 快速烧结系统缩短了烧结时间,且制备出的材料机械性能与常规烧结系统相比差距不大,在未来市场上的发展极具潜力。但其烧制出的自制试件气孔率升高,挠曲强度值下降,证明其对材料的制备工艺有更高的要求。

关键词: 快速烧结, 氧化锆, 机械性能, 晶相结构

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the changes of density, apparent porosity, Vickers hardness, flexural strength, and other performance of specimens at speed sintering conditions which met the requirements of dental zirconia mechanical properties under conventional sintering conditions. Methods: Specimens were prepared by the process of second sinter. Firstly, 22 specimens were prepared by the process of pre-sinter, of which 8 were long strips and 14 were discs. The pre-sintered blanks were divided equally into two groups for final sintering: the speed sintering group (SS) and the conventional sintering group (CS). The effects of two sintering system on the density, apparent porosity, Vickers hardness, flexural strength, and surface morphology of the self-made specimens were compared by related analysis. Results: The density of self-made zirconia prepared by speed sintering was similar to that prepared by conventional sintering method (P>0.05). The Vickers hardness and apparent porosity of speed sintering were higher than those of conventional sintering group (P<0.05), and the flexural strength was slightly lower than that of conventional sintering group (P<0.05). The crystal grains of the specimens prepared by speed sintering were smaller and denser, but the arrangement of the crystal grains was not well-distributed compared with the conventional sintering group, and the pores were visible. Conclusion: The speed sintering system will have great developmental potential in the future. However, the preparation has higher requirements.

Key words: speed sintering, zirconia, mechanical properties, crystal structure