CAD/CAM高嵌体与全冠修复上颌前磨牙的抗折性能研究

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2023.08.012

口腔医学研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 727-731.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2023.08.012

CAD/CAM高嵌体与全冠修复上颌前磨牙的抗折性能研究

吴洁^1*, 达云萌², 张钊¹, 袁硕¹, 马晓平³

1.河北医科大学口腔医学院·口腔医院修复科,河北省口腔医学重点实验室,河北省口腔疾病临床医学研究中心河北石家庄 050017;
2.河北省眼科医院口腔修复科河北邢台 054000;
3.河北医科大学口腔医院技工中心河北石家庄 050017

收稿日期:2022-12-07 发布日期:2023-08-17
通讯作者: *吴洁,E-mail:719102474@qq.com
作者简介:吴洁(1986~ ),女,河北辛集人,主治医师,硕士,研究方向:数字化修复。
基金资助:
2021年度河北省医学科学研究课题计划(编号:20210174)

Study on Fracture Resistance of Maxillary Premolars Restored with CAD/CAM Onlays and Crowns

WU Jie^1*, DA Yunmeng², ZHANG Zhao¹, YUAN Shuo¹, MA Xiaoping³

1. Department of Prosthodontics, Hebei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Hebei Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017, China;
2. Department of Prosthodontics, Hebei Eye Hospital, Xingtai 054000, China;
3. Department of Dental Lab, Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017, China

Received:2022-12-07 Published:2023-08-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 比较不同缺损类型的上颌前磨牙分别行高嵌体与全冠修复后的抗折强度。方法: 收集大小形态相似的64颗离体上颌第一前磨牙,随机分为4组(n＝16),分别制备成以下缺损类型:A牙合面缺损1/3组,B牙合面缺损1/2组,C邻牙合面缺损1/3组,D邻牙合面缺损1/2组。各组按照修复方式不同再分成两个亚组(n=8),A1-D1组行IPS e.max CAD高嵌体修复,A2-D2组行IPS e.max CAD全冠修复。在万能力学测试机上测试各组抗折力,记录折断力值、折断模式并进行统计学分析。结果: 高嵌体与全冠抗折力最大值均出现在A组,分别为(1203±148) N和(985±103) N。高嵌体修复组中A1组和B1组抗折强度明显高于C1组和D1组(P<0.05),全冠修复组中A2组和B2组抗折强度明显高于C2组和D2组(P<0.05)、C2组明显高于D2组(P<0.05)。同种缺损类型两种修复方式比较高嵌体抗折强度明显高于全冠(P<0.05)。各组间折裂模式无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论: 前磨牙缺损洞型会对修复强度产生影响,牙合面缺损及邻牙合缺损前磨牙行高嵌体修复较全冠抗折强度更高,可优先选择使用。

关键词: 高嵌体, 全冠, 上颌前磨牙, 抗折强度

Abstract: Objective: To compare the fracture resistance of defected maxillary premolars restored with onlay and crown, respectively. Methods: Sixty-four maxillary first premolars with similar size and morphology were randomly divided into four groups (n=16). The following defect types were prepared respectively: group A had 1/3 defect of occlusal surface; group B had 1/2 defect of occlusal surface; group C had 1/3 defect of proximal-occlusal surface; and group D had 1/2 defect of proximal-occlusal surface. Each group was divided into two subgroups according to different restore methods (n=8), A1-D1 were restored by IPS e.max CAD onlays, and A2-D2 were restored by IPS e.max CAD crowns. The maximum loading value and failure mode were analyzed.Results: The maximum fracture resistance of onlays and crowns, i.e. (1203±148) N and (985±103) N, appeared in group A. Among onlay restoration groups, fracture resistances of group A1 and B1 were significantly higher than those of group C1 and D1 (P<0.05). Among crown restoration groups, fracture resistances of group A2 and B2 were significantly higher than those of group C2 and D2 (P<0.05), and C2 was significantly higher than D2 group (P<0.05). Within the same defect type, fracture resistances of onlays were significantly higher than those of crowns (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the fracture mode among all groups (P>0.05).Conclusion: Defect types of premolar affect fracture resistance. For occlusal and proximal-occlusal defected premolars, fracture resistance of onlays was higher than that of crowns.

Key words: onlay, crown, maxillary premolar, fracture resistance

吴洁, 达云萌, 张钊, 袁硕, 马晓平. CAD/CAM高嵌体与全冠修复上颌前磨牙的抗折性能研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(8): 727-731.

WU Jie, DA Yunmeng, ZHANG Zhao, YUAN Shuo, MA Xiaoping. Study on Fracture Resistance of Maxillary Premolars Restored with CAD/CAM Onlays and Crowns[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2023, 39(8): 727-731.

参考文献

[1] García-Guerrero C, Parra-Junco C, Quijano-Guauque S, et al. Vertical root fractures in endodontically-treated teeth: A retrospective analysis of possible risk factors [J]. J Investig Clin Dent, 2018, 9(1).
[2] Hargreaves KM, Cohen S. Cohen's pathway of the pulp [M]. 10th ed. St.Louis:Mosby Inc, 2011. 790-791.
[3] 陈智,陈瑞甜. 牙体修复新观念[J]. 口腔医学研究,2019,35(1):1-9.
[4] 谭桂芳,吴娜,郭大伟,等. 全瓷高嵌体用于后牙根管治疗后牙体修复的临床回顾性研究 [J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志,2021,22(6):423-429.
[5] 何三纲. 口腔解剖生理学第8版 [M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2020.
[6] 刘明月,谭建国. 一步一步做好牙体缺损修复体类型的选择 [J]. 中华口腔医学杂志,2021,56(7):720-725.
[7] Rocca GT, Canneto JJ, Scotti N, et al. Restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolars: Influence of the ferrule effect on marginal integrity and fracture load of resin nano-ceramic CAD-CAM endocrowns [J]. Oper Dent, 2021, 46(6): 650-660.
[8] 史恒瑞. 不同边缘设计的E.max铸瓷高嵌体临床修复效果的观察[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志,2020,36(5):783-786.
[9] 强卫林,李雨轩,刘刚,等. 3种边缘设计铸瓷高嵌体修复不同程度缺损无髓磨牙的3年对比研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志,2018,36(5):493-497.
[10] González-López S, De Haro-Gasquet F, Vílchez-Díaz MA, et al. Effect of restorative procedures and occlusal loading on cuspal deflection [J]. Oper Dent, 2006, 31(1):33-38.
[11] de Mesquita CB, Melara R, Luisi SB, et al. Influence of dental crown topography on fracture resistance of premolars with MOD preparation and subjected to different restorativeprotocols [J]. Aust Endod J, 2021, 47(3):493-498.
[12] Abou-Elnaga MY, Alkhawas MAM, Kim HC, et al. Effect of truss access and artificial truss restoration on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular first molars [J]. J Endod, 2019, 45(6):813-817.
[13] 李智,徐永祥,包旭东,等. 垫底树脂和固位深度对树脂基纳米陶瓷髓腔固位冠修复磨牙抗折性能的影响 [J]. 北京大学学报(医学版),2022,54(1):95-99.
[14] Naumann M, Schmitter M, Frankenberger R, et al. "Ferrule comes first. Post is second!" Fake news and alternative facts? A systematic review [J]. J Endod, 2018, 44(2):212-219.
[15] Lima AF, Spazzin AO, Galafassi D, et al. Influence of ferrule preparation with or without glass fiber post on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth [J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2010, 18(4):360-363.
[16] Skupien JA, Kreulen C, Opdam N, et al. Effect of remaining cavity wall, cervical dentin, and post on fracture resistance of endodontically treated, composite restored premolars [J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2016, 29(2):154-156.
[17] 谭建国,杨洋. 一步一步做好全瓷修复粘接 [J]. 中华口腔医学杂志,2021,56(1):119-123.
[18] Roperto R, Sousa YT, Dias T, et al. Biomechanical behavior of maxillary premolars with conservative and traditional endodontic cavities [J]. Quintessence Int, 2019, 50(5):350-356.
[19] 邹高峰,常靓,张梅,等. E-max全冠与高嵌体修复根管治疗后牙的临床观察 [J]. 北京口腔医学,2021,29(2):85-89.

CAD/CAM高嵌体与全冠修复上颌前磨牙的抗折性能研究

Study on Fracture Resistance of Maxillary Premolars Restored with CAD/CAM Onlays and Crowns

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	丁月, 谢玲, 任乐文, 汪平. 全冠式和带环式丝圈保持器应用于单颗乳磨牙早失的回顾性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(12): 1182-1186.
[2]	李洋, 王时越, 祁麟. 牙本质肩领位置对下颌切牙抗折强度影响的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(10): 945-950.
[3]	郝鹏杰, 刘莉, 柳忠豪. PDCA循环结合Mini-Cex量表监控口腔住院医师全冠修复的质量管理[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(3): 302-304.
[4]	魏振辉, 孙贺婷, 高志银, 王薇, 张娇, 张鹏, 王金海. 不同材料高嵌体修复大面积缺损的上颌第一前磨牙有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(11): 1065-1068.
[5]	贾颖, 王频, 王振国, 刘敏. 下颌前磨牙根管治疗后不同修复设计抗折性能的对比研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(9): 879-882.
[6]	于世琦, 高旭, 文勇, 徐欣. 种植全冠粘固时不同处理方法对龈下多余粘固剂量影响的对比研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(10): 940-943.
[7]	周蕾,王传江,魏玉华. 两种材质改良高嵌体/冠修复中重度后牙缺损的疗效研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(8): 877-880.
[8]	黄琛琛, 潘丽娜, 张伟, 许庆安, 樊明文. CAD/CAM全瓷高嵌体修复根管治疗后牙体缺损的临床评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(10): 1056-1059.
[9]	李宏, 沈文静, 仇亚非, 袁硕, 郭长军. 3种烤瓷全冠对龈沟液中TNF-α和IL-1β水平的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(3): 247-249.
[10]	张潇, 李新, 张德强. 基于工业逆向工程及CAM技术的口腔修复全冠模型的构建及初步研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(3): 258-260.
[11]	魏振辉,杜原宏,王金海. 间接法树脂高嵌体修复磨牙残冠的临床评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(2): 179-181.
[12]	姚世宏,聂俊军. 氧化锆全瓷和钴铬合金冠修复对基牙牙周指数及致病菌的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(11): 1118-1120.