口腔医学研究

口腔医学研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 383-387.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2016.04.016

• 临床研究论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

口腔临床5种常用光固化灯光学性能的研究

林晓丽1,于皓2,3,林泓磊2,3,郑明2,3*,程辉2,3   

  1. 1. 福建医科大学口腔医学院修复科 福建 福州 350004;
    2. 福建医科大学附属口腔医院 福建 福州 350002;
    3. 福建省高校口腔医学重点实验室 福建 福州 350002
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-04 出版日期:2016-04-28 发布日期:2016-04-28
  • 通讯作者: 郑明,E-mail:zmdentist@163.com
  • 作者简介:林晓丽(1991~ ),女,福州人,硕士在读,主要从事口腔修复学研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    福建省自然科学基金项目(编号:2011J01168)福建省卫生系统中青年骨干人才培养项目(编号:2013-ZQD-ZD-23)

Optical Properties of Five Common Dental Curing Lights: a Laboratory Study.

LIN Xiao-li1,YU Hao2,3,LIN Hong-lei2,3,ZHENG Ming2,3*,CHENG Hui2,3.   

  1. 1. School of Stomatology,Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou 350004,China;
    2. Hospital of Stomatology,Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou 350002,China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Stomatology (FMU),Fujian Province University,Fuzhou 350002,China
  • Received:2015-08-04 Online:2016-04-28 Published:2016-04-28

PDF (PC)

639

被引次数

3

摘要： 目的:研究5种口腔LED光固化灯的光学性能,为临床选择合适的光固化灯提供参考。方法:收集全新的不同型号口腔LED光固化灯5台(SLC-VIIIB (杭州四方医疗器械有限公司),DemiPlus (Kerr), Elipar S10 (3M ESPE), Elipar (3M ESPE), VALO (Ultradent)),用辐照度光谱仪对LED光固化灯分别进行波形、波峰光强值及光强变化的测量,使用Bwsped4软件进行对比分析,并采用SPSS 18.0软件对光强值进行统计分析。结果:5台口腔LED光固化灯波形最大吸收峰波长值接近,均趋近于460 nm,不同型号的LED光固化灯的光强变化趋势各有特点,但都比较稳定。通过比较,相对光强大小排序如下:VALO>Elipar>Elipar S10>SLC-VIIIB>DemiPlus。结论:初步认为在测试的5台LED光固化灯中,VALO的光学性能最为优秀,吸收光谱范围广,时间短,功率高,效率好。

关键词: 光固化灯, 波形, 波峰值, 光强

Abstract: Objective: To study the optical properties of five kinds of dental LED curing lights to provide reference for selecting appropriate curing lights in dental practice. Methods: Five new dental LED curing lights were included in this study, including LC-VIIIB (Hangzhou Sifang Medical Apparatus), DemiPlus (Kerr), Elipar S10 (3M ESPE), Elipar (3M ESPE), and VALO (Ultradent). The waveform, wave peak and light intensity change of them were tested by the irradiance spectrograph and analyzed by the Bwsped4 software. The light intensity was compared by SPSS 18. Results: The maximum absorption wavelengths of 5 lights were all close to 460 nm. The trend of light intensity of each light had its own characteristics, but relatively stable. The intensities in descending order were as follows: VALO>Elipar>Elipar S10>SLC-VIIIB>DemiPlus. Conclusion: It can be preliminarily concluded that, among 5 LED curing lights, the optical property of the VALO is the best for its wide absorption spectrum, short time, high power and good efficiency.

中图分类号: