应用4种光固化纳米树脂粘接无托槽隐形矫治器附件的临床比较研究

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.07.024

口腔医学研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 784-787.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.07.024

应用4种光固化纳米树脂粘接无托槽隐形矫治器附件的临床比较研究

韩磊, 赵丹, 季骏^*

南京大学医学院附属口腔医院正畸科江苏南京 210008

收稿日期:2018-01-10 出版日期:2018-07-28 发布日期:2018-07-20
通讯作者: 季骏,E-mail:drjijun@126.com
作者简介:韩磊(1983~ ),男,山西人,主治医师,硕士,研究方向为正畸学。
基金资助:
南京市医学科技发展项目(编号:YKK16160,YKK17140)

Comparative Study of Four Bonding Materials in Bonding Attachment of Removable Thermoplastic Appliances

HAN Lei, ZHAO Dan, JI Jun^*

Department of Orthodontics, Stomatology Hospital affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China.

Received:2018-01-10 Online:2018-07-28 Published:2018-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:比较Filtek Z350XT纳米充填树脂和流动树脂,Tetric-N纳米瓷化充填树脂和流动树脂4种材料在粘接无托槽隐形矫治器附件时的操作时间和临床稳定性,为临床选择合适附件粘接材料提供依据。方法:将采用无托槽隐形矫治的60例错牙合畸形患者随机分为4组,每组15人。A组采用3M Adper SingleBond2粘接剂和Filtek Z350XT纳米充填树脂粘接附件,B组采用3M Adper SingleBond2粘接剂和Filtek Z350XT纳米流动树脂,C组采用Tetric N-bond粘接剂和Tetric N-cerum纳米瓷化充填树脂,D组采用Tetric N-bond粘接剂和Tetric N-flow纳米瓷化流动树脂。记录粘接每组附件所需的操作时间,评价粘接后、粘接后1个月、粘接后6个月、粘接后9个月和12个月后4组附件的脱落情况。结果: 应用流动树脂粘结附件的操作时间较充填树脂短(P<0.01);使用同种树脂粘接优化附件和传统附件在脱落率方面无明显差异;4种材料的脱落率在粘接时、粘接后1个月、粘接后6个月时均无统计学差异,但在粘接后9个月和粘接后12个月,流动树脂相比充填树脂脱落率较高(P<0.01)。结论: 流动树脂临床操作时间短,4种粘接材料在治疗初期的稳定性均达到满意的效果,但充填树脂在治疗后期的稳定性更好。

关键词: 无托槽隐形矫治, 附件, 复合树脂

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the operation time and clinical bonding failure of four types of bonding materials (Filtek Z350 XT nano filling composite resin, Filtek Z350 XT nano flowable composite resin, Tetric N-flow composite resin, Tetric N-cerum filling composite resin) in bonding attachment of removable thermoplastic appliance. Methods: Sixty malocclusion patients using removable thermoplastic appliances were randomly divided into four groups. 3M Z350 nano filling composite resin and Z350 nano flowable composite resin were used in group A and B, respectively. Tetric N-flow composite resin and Tetric N-cerum filling composite resin were bonded in group C and D, respectively. The operation time of each group was recorded. Failure rates of adhesion were evaluated at the end of adhesion, and 1 month, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months after adhesion. Results: The operation time of flow composite resin group was shorter than that of filling composite resin group (P<0.01). The adhesion failure rates were not significant different among four groups in the first 6 months. Significant difference was found between flow composite resin group and filling composite resin group after 9 and 12 months (P<0.01). However, no difference was found between optimized attachment and traditional attachment. Conclusion: The attachment stability of four types of materials could achieve satisfactory effect in the first 6 months. After 9 months, filling composite resin was more stable than nano flowable composite resin. However, the operation time of nano flowable composite resin was more efficient.

Key words: Removable thermo plastic appliances, Attachment, Composite resin

韩磊, 赵丹, 季骏. 应用4种光固化纳米树脂粘接无托槽隐形矫治器附件的临床比较研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(7): 784-787.

HAN Lei, ZHAO Dan, JI Jun. Comparative Study of Four Bonding Materials in Bonding Attachment of Removable Thermoplastic Appliances[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2018, 34(7): 784-787.

参考文献

[1] Orhan C.Tuncay.主编.白玉兴.主译.口腔正畸无托槽隐形矫治临床指南[M].北京:人民军医出版社.2008, 12:77-98
[2] Ellis CP. Invisalign and changing relationships [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2004, 126(1):20-21
[3] 刘晓默,胡炜.无托槽隐形矫治器的发展与临床应用[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,2012,19(1):55-58
[4] 顾泽旭,田杰,李变榕,等.无托槽隐形矫治技术中附件的应用[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2010,26(1):130-133
[5] Boyd RL. Esthetic orthodontic treatment using the invisalign^® appliance for moderate to complex malocclusions [J]. J Dent Educ, 2008, 72(8):948-967
[6] Needham R, Waring DT, Malik OH. Invisalign treatment of Class Ⅲ malocclusion with lower incisor extraction [J]. J Clin Orthod, 2015, 49(7):429-441
[7] Castroflorio T, Garino F, Lazzaro A.Upper-incisor root control with Invisalign appliances [J]. J Clin Orthod, 2013, 47(6):346-351
[8] Li W, Wang S, Zhang Y.The effectiveness of the invisalign appliance in extraction cases using the the ABO model grading system: a multicenter randomized controlled trial [J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(5):8276-8282
[9] 袁东辉,李立国,吴彦伟,等.无托槽隐形矫治技术附件的临床粘结技巧[J].口腔医学研究,2012,28(5):493-494
[10] 连月梅,白玉兴,厉松. 正畸无托槽隐形矫治器附件两种粘结方法的比较[J].北京口腔医学,2010,18(2):108-109
[11] 初可嘉,王海慧,郑之峻,等. 3种无托槽隐形矫治附件粘接法的比较研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2015,33(5):497-499
[12] Garoushi S, Lassila LV, Tezvergil A, et al. Static and fatigue compression test for particular filter composite resin with fiber-reinforced composite substructure [J]. Dent Mater,2007,23(1):17-23
[13] Mikhail SS, Azer SR, Schricker SS. Nanofillers in restorative dental materials [M]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014:1377-1442
[14] Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "macro" test methods [J]. Dent Mater, 2010, 26(2):38-49
[15] 张然,彭彬.4种粘结剂牙釉质剪切强度的实验研究[J].口腔医学,2011,13(2):108-110
[16] 刘倩. 附件对无托槽隐形矫治器固位力的影响及牙齿移动效率三维测量系统的建立[D].第四军医大学,2013

应用4种光固化纳米树脂粘接无托槽隐形矫治器附件的临床比较研究

Comparative Study of Four Bonding Materials in Bonding Attachment of Removable Thermoplastic Appliances

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	尚佳鑫, 苏瑞, 马冲, 李新月. 两种抛光方式对两种充填材料表面形貌和细胞增殖能力的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(6): 581-584.
[2]	苏涛, 王星星, 向彪, 吴刚, 邹敏. 不同刚度的无托槽隐形矫治器扩大上颌牙弓的有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(5): 454-458.
[3]	尹路, 杨常委, 郑燕芬, 林娉婷, 黄红蓝. 离体下颌前磨牙预备状况与贴面抗折性的关系[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(3): 264-268.
[4]	赵岩, 靳趁心. Micro CT评估光照模式对复合树脂微渗漏影响的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(3): 276-279.
[5]	向晓松, 苍松. 无托槽隐形矫治技术拔除前磨牙的支抗设计与临床控制[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(2): 117-120.
[6]	徐泽先, 杨彦伟, 邱宜农, 李志强, 王学锋, 王锐, 郑欣, 刘斌. 核壳状CHX/ACP纳米球改性流体树脂的体外释药研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(9): 898-901.
[7]	王志平, 赵蒙蒙, 董志恒, 牛月月, 王倩, 王青山. 纳米羟基磷灰石复合树脂与牙釉质之间粘接界面电镜观察[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(5): 457-460.
[8]	夏露露, 华先明. 无托槽隐形矫治中的根吸收[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(12): 1115-1118.
[9]	徐树森, 孙晶, 张苹, 郭阁. 透明冠在乳下切牙及乳尖牙龋损修复中的初步探讨[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(7): 759-762.
[10]	张娜, 谢超, 何惠明, 龚旭. 新型光固化树脂聚合收缩和机械性能的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(5): 505-508.
[11]	左志刚, 李洪发, 徐津, 郑朝, 武杰, 刘大勇. 三种正畸矫治器对牙周炎症及龈沟液炎性因子影响的长期研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(11): 1223-1227.
[12]	李迪, 李保泉, 魏玉雪, 牛菊, 赵文迪, 刘丹丹, 那辉, 刘晓秋. 新型牙科复合树脂的制备与机械性能研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(11): 1232-1234.
[13]	魏玉华, 杨苗. 疲劳循环对复合树脂微渗漏影响的体外研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(6): 668-670.
[14]	王新迎,万娜,闫磊,尹艳娇,马俊玥,曹蓉蓉,熊梦琳,高文辉,吴佩玲. 3种自酸蚀粘结剂与3种树脂对V类洞的微渗漏影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(1): 74-77.
[15]	刘洋阳,韦家强,王璐,徐镔亭. 不同配色方案对复合树脂双层修复颜色的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(8): 804-807.