口腔医学研究

口腔医学研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 274-278.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.03.020

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

比较Admira Fusion和 BEAUTIFIL Ⅱ两种复合树脂修复中老年患者牙颈部缺损的短期临床疗效

张凯莹1,2, 余颖欣1,2, 莫家尧1,2, 闫文娟1,3*   

  1. 1. 南方医科大学南方医院 广东 广州 510515;
    2. 南方医科大学 广东 广州 510515;
    3. 南方医科大学口腔医学院 广东 广州 510515
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-24 出版日期:2019-03-28 发布日期:2019-04-01
  • 通讯作者: * 闫文娟,E-mail:645613053@qq.com
  • 作者简介:张凯莹(1995~ ),女,广东广州人,硕士在读,主要从事牙体牙髓研究。
  • 基金资助:
    广东省自然科学基金(编号:2018A0303130213) 2016年度南方医科大学大学生创新创业训练项目 (省级)(编号:201612121063) 广东省教育厅高水平大学建设经费南方医科大学 临床研究启动计划(编号:LC2016PY023)

Short-term Clinical Effect of Admira Fusion and BEAUTIFIL Ⅱ in Restoration of Wedge-shaped Defects in Middle-aged and Senior Patients

ZHANG Kai-ying1,2, YU Ying-xin1,2, MO Jia-yao1,2, YAN Wen-juan1,3*   

  1. 1. Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;
    2. Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;
    3. School of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
  • Received:2018-12-24 Online:2019-03-28 Published:2019-04-01

PDF (PC)

219

摘要： 目的:观察比较Admira Fusion和BEAUTIFIL Ⅱ两种复合树脂修复中老年患者中度颈部缺损患牙的短期临床疗效并分析其影响因素。方法:选取2016年9月~2017年3月于南方医院就诊的50例年龄介于50~80岁的中度颈部缺损患者为研究对象,分别采用Admira Fusion纳米树脂(A组)和BEAUTIFIL Ⅱ纳米树脂(B组)修复,随访修复成功率、边缘密合率、表面粗糙率、色泽协调率、菌斑指数以及影响因素。结果:修复后12个月A组患牙修复成功率显著高于B组 (96.00%∶84.00%,P＜0.05)。修复后12 个月,A组患牙边缘密合率和表面粗糙率分别为96.00%、4.00%,B组分别为84.00%、16.00%(P＜0.05)。疗效单因素分析显示口腔卫生习惯、饮食习惯、刷牙方式、牙位、双侧咀嚼及咬合与颈部缺损修复成功率相关(P＜0.05)。结论:相比于BEAUTIFIL Ⅱ纳米树脂,Admira Fusion纳米树脂材料修复中老年患者颈部缺损成功率较高,其具有良好的边缘密合性和极佳的色泽协调性,故更适合修复中老年中度颈部缺损患牙。

关键词: Admira, Fusion, BEAUTIFIL, Ⅱ, 颈部缺损, 中老年患者

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the short-term clinical effect and related influencing factors of Admira Fusion and BEAUTIFIL Ⅱ resin used for moderate wedge-shaped defects in senior patients. Methods: Fifty cases of patients, between 50 to 80 years old, with moderate wedge-shaped defects were selected from September 2016 to March 2017 as research objects. They were randomly divided into two groups and were treated with Admira Fusion (Group A) and BEAUTIFIL Ⅱ (Group B), respectively. The repair success rate, the edge sealing rate, the rough surface rate, the color coordination rate, the Q-H modified plaque index, and related influencing factors were followed up. The relevant clinical data were analyzed. Results: Twelve months after restoration, the success rate of Group A (96%) was significantly higher than Group B (84%) (P＜0.05). Twelve months after restoration, the edge sealing rate and the rough surface rate of Group A were 96% and 4%, respectively. While those of Group B were 84% and 16% (P＜0.05). Univariate analysis showed that the success rate of restoration was correlated with oral hygiene habits, diet, the tooth position, and chewing habits (P<0.05). Conclusion: Admira Fusion nano-resin to repair moderate wedge-shaped defects of middle-aged and senior patients has indicated better marginal sealing and excellent color match, which is worthy of wide clinical application. Thus Admira Fusion should be the preferred choice for senior patients with moderate wedge-shaped defects.

Key words: Admira, Fusion, BEAUTIFIL Ⅱ, Wedge-shaped defects, Middle-aged and senior patients