口腔医学研究

口腔医学研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 944-947.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.10.009

• 口腔种植修复学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

种植修复体改良粘接技术对种植体周组织健康的影响

刘族志1, 付东杰2*   

  1. 1. 海南省儋州市人民医院口腔科 海南 儋州 571700;
    2. 武汉大学人民医院口腔科 湖北 武汉 430079
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-14 出版日期:2019-10-28 发布日期:2019-10-22
  • 通讯作者: 付东杰,E-mail:dongjie_fu@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘族志(1984~ ),男,海南临高人,学士,主治医师,主要从事口腔科临床治疗工作。
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省卫计委科研基金(编号:WJ2017F001)

Effect of Modified Adhesive Retention Technique on Tooth Function in Treatment of Dentition Defect with Oral Implantation.

LIU Zuzhi1, FU Dongjie2*   

  1. 1. Department of Stomatology, Renming Hospital of Danzhou City, Danzhou 571700, China;
    2. Department of Stomatology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
  • Received:2019-06-14 Online:2019-10-28 Published:2019-10-22

PDF (PC)

212

摘要： 目的:口腔种植修复治疗牙列缺损不同粘接固位对预后影响分析。方法:研究时间为2017年1月~2018年1月,我科室收治的牙列缺损实施口腔种植修复治疗的患者84例为研究对象,按照双盲法分成两组,常规组采用直接粘接,改良组采用改良粘结技术,两组患者改良菌斑指数,改良出血指数,牙槽高度、厚度,骨吸收量以及治疗满意度评分比较。结果:改良组牙槽高度、厚度均高于常规组,骨吸收量低于常规组(P<0.05)。跟踪随访1年,改良组患者改良菌斑指数等级0级、1级比例明显优于常规组(P<0.05)。跟踪随访1年,改良组患者统计改良出血指数优于常规组(P<0.05)。改良组临床治疗咀嚼功能、语言功能、牢固程度、舒适度、美观度评分均高于常规组(P<0.05)。结论:口腔种植修复治疗牙列缺损的效果是肯定的,在处理粘接固位的技术中,改良粘接技术较比常规直接粘接近期效果较好,稳定度以及骨量吸收情况更好,患者的满意度高。

关键词: 口腔, 种植修复, 牙列缺损, 粘接, 效果

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the effect of dental implant retention method on the prognosis of dentition defect. Methods: From January 2017 to January 2018, 84 patients with dentition defect treated by dental implant were divided into two groups according to double blind method. The modified plaque index, improved bleeding index, alveolar height, thickness, bone resorption, and treatment satisfaction score were compared between the two groups. Results: The alveolar height and thickness of the modified group were higher than those of routine group, and the bone resorption was lower than that of routine group (P<0.05). After 1 year follow-up, the modified plaque index of the modified group was 0, and the proportion of the first grade was significantly better than that of the routine group (P<0.05). The modified bleeding index in the modified group was better than that in the routine group (P<0.05). The scores of masticatory function, language function, firmness, comfort, and beauty in the modified group were higher than those in the routine group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Dental implant is positive for the treatment of dentition defect. The modified bonding technique is better than the conventional one in the short-term effect.

Key words: oral cavity, implant repair, dentition defect, adhesion, effect