有机酸类冲洗液对根管内玷污层清理效果的研究进展

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2020.05.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 根管预备过程中,机械预备会在根管壁表面和牙本质小管内形成玷污层,玷污层清理不足可导致根管治疗最终失败。因此许多学者以去除根管内玷污层为目的,对根管冲洗液的清理效果进行了大量广泛的研究,目前主流清理玷污层的冲洗液之一就是有机酸及以有机酸为主要成分的复合型冲洗液。本文就目前有机酸冲洗液对根管玷污层清理效果的研究进展作一综述,提示以有机酸为主的复合型冲洗液、马来酸和鞣酸冲洗液可作为去除玷污层的优先选择,为临床牙髓病治疗提供一定的参考。

关键词: 根管治疗, 根管冲洗, 有机酸, 玷污层

Abstract: A smear layer is produced during the instrumentation, which could be found both on the canal wall and into some dental tubules. Insufficient cleaning of the smear layer could result in failure of root canal therapy finally. Therefore, smear layer removing ability of root canal irrigation solutions had been researched by many scholars. Recently, one of the main root canal irrigation solutions for smear layer removal was organic acids and organic acid-based mixtures irrigation solutions. This article summarizes the current research progress on smear layer removing ability of organic acid irrigation solutions. It is suggested that the organic acid-based mixtures irrigation solutions, maleic acid, and tannic acid could be used the priority to remove the smear layer, which provides some reference for the clinic endodontic treatment.

Key words: root canal therapy, root canal irrigants, organic acid, smear layer

乐鑫, 申静. 有机酸类冲洗液对根管内玷污层清理效果的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(5): 416-419.

YUE Xin, SHEN Jing. Research Progress on Smear Layer Removing Ability in Root Canals of Organic Acid Irrigation Solutions[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(5): 416-419.

参考文献

[1] R Holliday. Cohen's pathways of the pulp, 10th edition[J]. Br Dent J, 2011, 210(5):242.
[2] Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, et al. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions[J]. Endodontic topics, 2005, 10(1): 77-102.
[3] Machado-Silveiro LF, González-López S, González-Rodríguez MP. Decalcification of root canal dentine by citric acid, EDTA and sodium citrate[J]. Int Endod J, 2004, 37(6): 365-369.
[4] Scelza MFZ , Teixeira AM , Scelza P . Decalcifying effect of EDTA-T, 10% citric acid, and 17% EDTA on root canal dentin[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2003, 95(2):234-236.
[5] Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M, Sbaizero O. Effectiveness of 1 mol·L^-1 citric acid and 15% EDTA irrigation on smear layer removal[J]. Int Endod J, 2000, 33(1): 46-52.
[6] Wu L, Mu Y, Deng X, et al. Comparison of the effect of four decalcifying agents combined with 60 C 3% sodium hypochlorite on smear layer removal[J]. J Endod, 2012, 38(3): 381-384.
[7] Reis C, De-Deus G, Leal F, et al. Strong effect on dentin after the use of high concentrations of citric acid: an assessment with co-site optical microscopy and ESEM[J]. Dent Mater, 2008, 24(12): 1608-1615.
[8] Takeda FH, Harashima T, Kimura Y, et al. A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser[J]. In Endod J, 1999, 32(1): 32-39.
[9] Torabinejad M, Khademi AA, Babagoli J, et al. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer[J]. J Endod, 2003, 29(3): 170-175.
[10] Torabinejad M, Shabahang S, Aprecio RM, et al. The antimicrobial effect of MTAD: an in vitro investigation[J]. J Endod, 2003, 29(6): 400-403.
[11] Ulusoy ÖÍ, Görgül G. Effects of different irrigation solutions on root dentine microhardness, smear layer removal and erosion[J]. Aust Endod J, 2013, 39(2): 66-72.
[12] Kalyoncuolu E, Demiryürek EÖ. A comparative scanning electron microscopy evaluation of smear layer removal from teeth with different irrigation solutions and lasers[J]. Microsc Microanal, 2013, 19(6): 1465-1469.
[13] Cehreli ZC, Uyanik MO, Nagas E, et al. A comparison of residual smear layer and erosion following different endodontic irrigation protocols tested under clinical and laboratory conditions[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 2013, 71(5): 1261-1266.
[14] Lotfi M, Vosoughhosseini S, Saghiri MA, et al. Effect of MTAD as a final rinse on removal of smear layer in ten-minute preparation time[J]. J Endod, 2012, 38(10): 1391-1394.
[15] Adigüzel Ö, Yiğit-Özer S, Kaya S, et al. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2011, 112(6): 803-808.
[16] 尹艳娇,葛翘诚,丁欣欣,等.Qmix,MTAD与EDTA去除根管玷污层的实验观察[J].口腔医学研究,2017,33(11): 1197-1200.
[17] Çiçek E, Keskin Ö. The effect of the temperature changes of EDTA and MTAD on the removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscopy study[J]. Scanning, 2015, 37(3): 193-196.
[18] Aranda-Garcia AJ, Kuga MC, Vitorino KR, et al. Effect of the root canal final rinse protocols on the debris and smear layer removal and on the push-out strength of an epoxy-based sealer[J]. Microsc Res Tech, 2013, 76(5): 533-537.
[19] Tay FR, Pashley DH, Loushine RJ, et al. Ultrastructure of smear layer-covered intraradicular dentin after irrigation with BioPure MTAD[J]. J Endod, 2006, 32(3): 218-221.
[20] Lei L, Liu H, Cai Y, et al. MTAD combined with endosonic irrigation as a new approach for the disinfection of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm[J]. J Dent Sci, 2015, 10(4): 437-443.
[21] Poggio C, Dagna A, Colombo M, et al. Decalcifying effect of different ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid irrigating solutions and tetraclean on root canal dentin[J]. J Endod, 2012, 38(9): 1239-1243.
[22] Giardino L, Ambu E, Becce C, et al. Surface tension comparison of four common root canal irrigants and two new irrigants containing antibiotic[J]. J Endod, 2006, 32(11): 1091-1093.
[23] Paragliola R, Franco V, Fabiani C, et al. Comparison of smear layer removal using four final-rinse protocols[J]. Int Dent, 2004, 1: 4-7.
[24] Prabhu SG, Rahim N, Bhat KS, et al. Comparison of removal of endodontic smear layer using NaOCl, EDTA, and different concentrations of maleic acid-A SEM study[J]. Endod, 2003, 15(1): 20-25.
[25] Ballal NV, Mala K, Bhat KS. Evaluation of the effect of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on the microhardness and surface roughness of human root canal dentin[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(8): 1385-1388.
[26] Ballal NV, Mala K, Bhat KS. Effect of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on the dissolution of human pulp tissue-an in vitro study[J]. Int EndodJ, 2011, 44(4): 353-356.
[27] 张苏娜,唐荣银,胡坤,等.五倍子水提取物去除根管内玷污层的扫描电镜观察[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2007,17(11): 638-641.
[28] Poletto D, Poletto AC, Cavalaro A, et al. Smear layer removal by different chemical solutions used with or without ultrasonic activation after post preparation[J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2017, 42(4): 324-331.
[29] Turk T, Kaval ME,Şen BH. Evaluation of the smear layer removal and erosive capacity of EDTA, boric acid, citric acid and desy clean solutions: an in vitro study[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2015, 15(1): 104.