骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形早期矫治的研究进展

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.10.003

口腔医学研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 922-924.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.10.003

骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形早期矫治的研究进展

陈璐璐, 卢海平^*

浙江中医药大学口腔医学院浙江杭州 310053

收稿日期:2019-02-23 出版日期:2019-10-28 发布日期:2019-10-22
通讯作者: 卢海平,E-mail:perfectdentalcare@qq.com
作者简介:陈璐璐(1993~ ),女,浙江温州人,硕士在读,主要研究骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形生长发育、早期矫治等。
基金资助:
浙江省自然科学基金(编号:LY19H140001)

Research Progress in Early Treatment in Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusion

CHEN Lulu, LU Haiping^*

School of Stomatology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China.

Received:2019-02-23 Online:2019-10-28 Published:2019-10-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形的形成是遗传和环境因素共同作用的结果,且随生长发育而加重。临床需对此类错牙合进行早期干预治疗,以降低后期治疗的难度。尽管进行早期矫治可获得较好的短期疗效,但是其长期预后仍存在争议。本文就骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形的病因、早期矫治疗效及长期预后作一综述。

关键词: 骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形, 病因, 早期矫治, 预测

Abstract: The formation of skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion is the interaction result of genetic and environmental factors, which becomes worse with growth and development. Clinically, early treatment is often carried out in order to reduce the difficulty of later treatment. Although early treatment can achieve good short-term effect, its long-term prognosis is controversial. This article reviews the etiology, early treatment efficacy, and the prediction of long-term prognosis in skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion.

Key words: skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion, etiology, early treatment, prediction

陈璐璐, 卢海平. 骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形早期矫治的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(10): 922-924.

CHEN Lulu, LU Haiping. Research Progress in Early Treatment in Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusion[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2019, 35(10): 922-924.

参考文献

[1] Zere E, Chaudhari PK, Sharan J, et al. Developing Class Ⅲ malocclusions: challenges and solutions [J]. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent, 2018, 10:99-116.
[2] Iwasaki T, Sato H, Suga H, et al. Relationships among nasal resistance, adenoids, tonsils, and tongue posture and maxillofacial form in Class Ⅱ and Class Ⅲ children [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2017, 151(5):929-940.
[3] Hultcrantz E, Larson M, Hellquist R, et al. The influence of tonsillar obstruction and tonsillectomy on facial growth and dental arch morphology [J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 1991, 22(2):125.
[4] Diouf JS, Ngom PI, Sonko O, et al. Influence of tonsillar grade on the dental arch measurements [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2015, 147(2):214-220.
[5] Mattar SE, Matsumoto MA, Valera FC, et al. The effect of adenoidectomy or adenotonsillectomy on occlusal features in mouth-breathing preschoolers [J]. Pediatr Dent, 2012, 34(2):108-112.
[6] Seehra J, Fleming PS, Mandall N, et al. A comparison of two different techniques for early correction of Class Ⅲ malocclusion [J]. Angle Orthod, 2012, 82(1):96-101.
[7] Yang X, Li C, Bai D, et al. Treatment effectiveness of Fränkel function regulator on the Class Ⅲ malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2014, 146(2):143-154.
[8] 杜雅晶, 黄诗言, 饶南荃, 等. FränkelⅢ型矫治器早期矫治儿童骨性Ⅲ类错的临床疗效研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2016,51(5):257-262.
[9] Mittal M, Singh H, Kumar A, et al. Reverse twin block for interceptive management of developing class Ⅲ malocclusion [J]. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 2017, 35(1):86-89.
[10] Manuel N, Benedict W, Lorenzo F, et al. Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination: a controlled clinical study [J]. Angle Orthod, 2015, 85(5): 764-770.
[11] 于汉英,郝洁,邱赛男,等.未治疗的安氏Ⅲ类患者颅颌面生长发育特点[J].北京口腔医学,2016,24(4): 201-205.
[12] Zhang W, Qu HC, Yu M, et al. The effects of maxillary protraction with or without rapid maxillary expansion and age factors in treating class Ⅲ malocclusion: a meta-analysis [J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(6): e0130096.
[13] Liu W, Zhou Y, Wang X, et al. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2015, 148(4): 641-651.
[14] Onem Ozbilen E, Yilmaz HN, Kucukkeles N. Comparison of the effects of rapid maxillary expansion and alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction protocols followed by facemask therapy [J]. Korean J Orthod, 2019, 49(1): 49-58.
[15] Cevidanes L, Baccetti T, Franchi L, et al. Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion [J]. Angle Orthod, 2010, 80(5): 799-806.
[16] Hugo DC, Lucia C, Tiziano B. Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class Ⅲ patients [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 138(5): 577-581.
[17] Maino G, Turci Y, Arreghini A, et al. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of hybrid rapid palatal expansion and facemask treatment in growing skeletal Class Ⅲ patients [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2018, 153(2): 262-268.
[18] Elnagar MH, Elshourbagy E, Ghobashy S, et al. Comparative evaluation of 2 skeletally anchored maxillary protraction protocols [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2016, 150(5): 751-762.
[19] Ming Y, Hu Y, Li Y, et al. Effects of maxillary protraction appliances on airway dimensions in growing class Ⅲ maxillary retrognathic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2018, 105:138-145.
[20] Camacho M, Chang ET, Song SA, et al. Rapid maxillary expansion for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Laryngoscope, 2017, 127(7):1712-1719.
[21] Smyth RSD, Ryan FS. Early treatment of class Ⅲ malocclusion with facemask [J]. Evid Based Dent, 2017, 18(4): 107-108.
[22] Chatzoudi MI, Ioannidou-Marathiotou I, Papadopoulos MA. Clinical effectiveness of chin cup treatment for the management of Class Ⅲ malocclusion in pre-pubertal patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Prog Orthod, 2014, 15(1): 62.
[23] Perinetti G, Bertoli A, Dzemidzic V. Outcome stability of orthopaedic treatment of Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusion: A study of prognostic agreement between three models [J]. South Eur J Orthod Dentofac Res, 2017, 4(2): 20-25.
[24] Nardoni DN, Siqueira DF, Cardoso MA, et al. Cephalometric variables used to predict the success of interceptive treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and face mask. A longitudinal study [J]. Dental Press J Orthod, 2015, 20(1): 85-96.
[25] 彭朋. 上颌前方牵引矫治远期稳定性预测模型的建立[D]. 中国医科大学,2015.
[26] Radalj Milicic Z, Kranjcevic Bubica A, Nikolov Boric D, et al. Linear predictors of facial rotation pattern in croatian subjects with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion [J]. Acta Stomatol Croat, 2018, 52(3): 227-237.
[27] Wendl B, Kamenica A, Droschl H, et al. Retrospective 25-year follow-up of treatment outcomes in Angle Class Ⅲ patients : Success versus failure [J]. J Orofac Orthop, 2017, 78(2): 129-136.

骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形早期矫治的研究进展

Research Progress in Early Treatment in Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusion

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	董晓梦, 白丁. 露龈笑治疗现状与展望[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(7): 626-629.
[2]	贺红, 赵婷婷. 儿童错牙合畸形的早期矫治[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(12): 1083-1086.
[3]	程慧娜, 周青. 下颌骨特发性髁突吸收的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(5): 427-429.
[4]	徐凡, 周青. 下颌骨特发性髁突吸收的认识和争议[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(5): 430-432.
[5]	王新, 杜毅. 老年人根面龋的预防[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(3): 234-237.
[6]	郭佳男, 何苇. 微小RNA导致腭裂发生机制的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(12): 1111-1114.
[7]	吴越琳,赵蕾,吴亚菲. 掌跖角化-牙周破坏综合征的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(9): 928-931.
[8]	彭博, 曾素娟, 葛林虎. 多生牙的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(2): 209-212.
[9]	高洁,葛振林. 利用微螺钉种植体支抗矫治骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形的现状[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(12): 1274-1276.
[10]	王涵, 葛振林. 尖牙阻生的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(11): 1158-1160.
[11]	董子昱, 张芳. 口腔扁平苔藓唾液标记物研究现状分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(11): 1168-1171.
[12]	肖燕, 沈凯奇, 郭嘉, 张文博, 刘冰. 纤维桩修复不同形态上颌尖牙根管的动力学与疲劳分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(8): 860-864.
[13]	于皓,张栋,程少龙,程辉. 基于多元线性回归模型的牙齿比色方法[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(11): 1156-1159.
[14]	郑伟龙, 原工杰. 隐形矫治器控制牙齿移动可预测性的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(10): 1103-1105.