根管显微镜联合超声震荡在根管治疗中的临床疗效评价

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.08.014

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 观察分析根管显微镜联合超声震荡在根管治疗中的临床效果。方法: 选取我院口腔科2018年2月~2019年2月收治的80例需要进行根管治疗的患者为研究对象,将其随机分为研究组与对照组,每组40例。研究组患者进行显微镜联合超声震荡技术进行根管治疗,对照组患者采用常规技术进行根管治疗,比较两组患者治疗前后的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、血清白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)等水平,以及治疗总体有效率和患者满意度。结果: 两组患者的VAS评分,治疗后均低于治疗前,且研究组低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05);两组患者的IL-6、TNF-α、hs-CRP等炎性因子水平均低于治疗前,且研究组低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05);研究组患者治疗总体有效率为95.00%,高于对照组的77.50%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论: 相比于传统方式的根管治疗,显微镜联合超声震荡的根管治疗技术能够有效减轻患者根管治疗后的疼痛,降低炎性因子水平,提高根管治疗的总体有效率和患者的满意度,值得临床推广。

关键词: 根管显微镜, 超声震荡, 根管治疗

Abstract: Objective: To observe and analyze the clinical effect of root canal microscope combined with ultrasonic oscillation in root canal treatment. Methods: From February 2018 to February 2019, 80 patients who needed root canal treatment were admitted to the Department of Stomatology of our hospital and were randomly divided into study group and control group, with 40 cases in each group. Patients in the study group underwent root canal therapy with microscope combined with ultrasonic oscillation technology, and patients in the control group underwent root canal therapy with conventional techniques. The patients were evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS) and measured the content of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) before and after treatment. And the overall treatment efficiency and patient satisfaction were also assessed. Results: The VAS scores of two groups of patients after the treatment were lower than those before the treatment, and the study group was lower than the control group (P＜0.05). The content of IL-6, TNF-α, and hs-CRP of two groups of patients were lower than those before the treatment, and the study group was lower than the control group (P＜0.05). The overall effective rate of the study group was 95.00%, which was higher than 77.50% in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the traditional technology, the root canal treatment used by microscope combined with ultrasonic vibration could effectively reduce the pain of patients after treatment, reduce the level of inflammatory factors, and improve the overall effectiveness and patient satisfaction. It is worthy of clinical promotion.

Key words: root canal microscope, ultrasonic oscillation, root canal treatment

黄达翠, 赵苏立. 根管显微镜联合超声震荡在根管治疗中的临床疗效评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(8): 737-740.

HUANG Dacui, ZHAO Suli. Clinical Effect of Root Canal Microscope Combined with Ultrasonic Oscillation in Root Canal Treatment[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(8): 737-740.

参考文献

[1] 姜雨然,朱琳虹,张敬.根管治疗后疾病的临床研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志, 2020, 36(2):373-377.
[2] 蒋文凯,吕海鹏,张亚庆.老年人阻塞根管治疗复杂性探讨[J].口腔医学研究, 2019,3(35):221-223.
[3] 王捍国,余擎.显微根管外科手术相关临床问题的思考[J].中华口腔医学杂志, 2019, 54(9):598-604.
[4] 蔡雪,王晓燕.根管超声冲洗效果的影响因素[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2014,41(1):72-76.
[5] 周楠,丁梦,何琴,等.不同材料CAD/CAM髓超嵌体修复根管治疗后牙体缺损临床效果评价[J].中国实用口腔科杂志, 2019, 12(2):87-91.
[6] 田萍兰.显微根尖手术治疗慢性根尖周炎96例疗效观察[J].中国药物与临床, 2020,20(6):933-935.
[7] 中华口腔医学会牙体牙髓病学专业委员会.牙体牙髓病诊疗中牙科显微镜操作规范的专家共识[J].中华口腔医学杂志, 2020, 55(5):333-336.
[8] 余擎,邝容.根管治疗失败原因分析及防治策略[J].国际口腔医学杂志, 2010, 37(5):497-501.
[9] 舒绍兵,陶波,王应富,等.根管治疗失败的原因分析及预防探讨[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2013,29(1):56-58.
[10] Verhaagen B, Boutsioukis C, Jiang LM, et al. Ultrasonic cleaning of the root canal [J]. J Acoust Soc Am, 2012, 131(4):3440-3448.
[11] Koçani F, Kamberi B, Dragusha E. Manual sonic-air and ultrasonic instrumentation of root canal and irrigation with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and 17% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid: A scanning electron microscope study [J]. J Conserv Dent, 2012, 15(2):118-122.
[12] 刘桂香,王青,窦慧芹.超声冲洗对感染根管内毒素的灭活及清除作用[J].华西口腔医学杂志, 2010,28(2):50-53.
[13] 齐林,周国华,王为.TNF-α、IL-6在炎症性肠病发病机制中的研究进展[J].医学综述, 2014,20(7):1174-1176.
[14] 丁凯宏,班副植,黄承乐,等.急性胰腺炎患者血清降钙素原、超敏C反应蛋白、白细胞介素6水平变化及临床意义[J].国际检验医学杂志,2013,34(17):2241-2242.

[1]	郝俊燕, 胡洪成, 韩怡, 曹佳, 周海全, 宣岩, 杨影, 侯晓玫. 根管内吸引器用于3D打印模型牙吸引效果的体外研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(7): 661-665.
[2]	李佳桐, 傅裕杰, 满毅, 黄定明. 上颌磨牙根尖周囊肿致上颌窦底骨板破坏行显微手术1例[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(7): 671-672.
[3]	李娜, 李祥伟. 根管系统封闭性的影响因素及其检测方法[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(3): 200-203.
[4]	乐鑫, 申静. 有机酸类冲洗液对根管内玷污层清理效果的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(5): 416-419.
[5]	任亚敏, 王亚楠, 陈劲宏, 郭人铭, 刘晗哲, 崔淑霞. 正畸对根管治疗牙牙根吸收的影响因素研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(5): 459-461.
[6]	侯亚静, 黄定明. 感染根管细菌内毒素的致病机制与清除策略[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(1): 7-9.
[7]	黄紫荆, 胡晓莉. 减压术在根尖囊肿治疗中的应用进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(9): 837-840.
[8]	刘琼, 任飞, 钱虹, 方静娴, 刘河娣, 吴小明. M3乳牙镍钛锉在乳牙根管治疗中的临床效果研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(9): 876-878.
[9]	方艳君, 宣汉生, 潘婉, 梁珊珊, 孟柳燕. 下颌第一磨牙远中4根管1例[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(8): 814-816.
[10]	蒋文凯, 吕海鹏, 张亚庆. 老年人阻塞根管治疗复杂性探讨[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(3): 221-223.
[11]	赵小娥,李婷婷,廖小竹,张昀,陈智. 右上颌第二恒磨牙5根管1例[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(2): 194-196.
[12]	马晓伟. 机用镍钛器械用于乳磨牙根管治疗临床效果评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(9): 1016-1018.
[13]	刘琼, 钱虹, 任飞, 方静娴, 刘河娣, 吴小明. 儿童橡皮障在乳牙根管治疗术中的临床价值[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(7): 756-758.
[14]	陈智, 陈瑞甜. 髓腔固位冠[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(1): 1-5.
[15]	张梅, 倪璨, 任双双, 李雯, 禹怡君, 苗雷英. 上颌第二磨牙根管变异[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(11): 1226-1227.