Retrospective Study of Submerged Implant Restoration after Ten Years

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.02.016

Abstract

Abstract: Objective : To evaluate the clinical effect and implant retention rate of submerged implant restoration, and to analyze and summarize the long-term clinical effects of various bone augmentation techniques and the reasons of the complications of the implant by retrospectively studying the submerged implantation cases. Methods: From January 2005 to January 2008, the Department of Implantology in our hospital was selected to study the submerged implants. According to the exclusion criteria, a total of 1776 implants were included in 893 patients. For patients who could not come to hospital, a telephone interview or X-ray film was sent for investigation. Results: A total of 865 implants in 467 patients were investigated through outpatient visits or telephone interviews, accounting for 48.7% of the total implants. According to the Wheeler implant retention rate standard, the retention rate for these implants was 96.65% for ten years. Conclusion: The overall satisfaction degree of submerged implant restorations after 10 years by clinical re-examination is high, with a retention rate of 96.65%.

Key words: Submerged implantation, Retrospective study, Retention rate

HE Ping, FENG Yu, LI Ji-yin, WU Xiao-le, CHEN Xiao-dong. Retrospective Study of Submerged Implant Restoration after Ten Years[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2019, 35(2): 168-171.

References

[1] 宿玉成.现代口腔种植学.见:宿玉成主编.现代口腔种植学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.4-5.
[2] Choi BH, Li J, Kim HS, et al. Comparison of submerged and nonsubmerged implants placed without flap reflection in the canine mandible [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008, 105(5):561-565.
[3] Weber HP, Buser D, Donath K, et al. Comparison of healed tissues adjacent to submerged and non-submerged unloaded titanium dental implants. A histometric study in beagle dogs [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1996, 7(1):11-19.
[4] Ericsson I ,Nilner K, Klinge B.Radiographical and histological characteristics of ssubmerged and nonsubmerged titanium implants. An experimental study in the Labrador dog [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1996, 7(1):20-26.
[5] 钱玙,王琼,张凤鸣.88例种植体临床疗效观察及失败病例分析[J].当代医学,2013, 19(14):34-36.
[6] Wheeler SL, Holmes RE, Calhoun CJ. Six-year clinical and histologic study of sinus-lift grafts[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1996, 11(1):26-34.
[7] Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1986, 1(1):11-25.
[8] 林野,李健慧,丘立新,等.口腔种植修复临床效果十年回顾研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2006,41( 3) :131-135.
[9] Kim DM, Badovinac RL, Lorenz RL, et al. A 10-year prospective clinical andradiographic study of one-stage dental implants [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(3):254-258.
[10] Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, et al. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. I: Clinical and radiographic results [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2010, 18(6):699-706.
[11] 郭平川,孟学梅,刘春年,等.口腔种植修复临床效果五年回顾研究[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2007,12(4):167-171.
[12] Kim YK, Park JY, Kim SG, et al. Prognosis of the implants replaced after removal of failed dental implants [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2010, 110(3):281-286.
[13] Stone JL, Beaupre GS, Hayes WC. Multiaxial strength characteristics of trabecular bone [J]. J Biomech, 1983, 16(9):743-752.
[14] Draenert FG, Huetzen D, Neff A,et al. Vertical bone augmentation procedures: basics and techniques in dental implantology [J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2014, 102(5):1605-1613.
[15] 庄秀妹,朱呈小露,邓飞龙,等.Osstell ISQTM监测种植体稳定性的临床研究[J].中国口腔种植学杂志, 2013,18(3):133-134.
[16] Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, et al. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (Ⅱ). Etiopathogenesis [J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 1998, 106(3):721-764.
[17] 王丽君,杨小东,章德农,等.种植修复十年以上病例的回顾性研究[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2014,19(3):127-130.