A Review of Shaping Ability of Curved Root Canals between ProTaper,WaveOne, and ProTaperNext.

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.10.005

Abstract

Abstract: ProTaper is one of the widest used nickel-titanium instruments. However, because of stiffness and high broken rate, its application in clinical has been limited. Recently, Dentsply has pushed out two different NITIs, i.e. WaveOne and ProTaperNext, which aims to reduce the high broken rate. This review summarizes the design features, mechanical properties, and shaping ability of curved canals.

Key words: ProTaper, WaveOne, ProTaperNext, Curved canal, Root canal preparation

LIU Yuan-yuan, LIU Sheng-bo.. A Review of Shaping Ability of Curved Root Canals between ProTaper,WaveOne, and ProTaperNext.[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2018, 34(10): 1048-1051.

References

[1] Delai D, Boijink D, Hoppe CB, et al. Apically extruded debris in filling removal of curved canals using 3 NiTi systems and hand files [J]. Braz Dent J, 2018, 29(1)∶54-59
[2] Ertas H, Capar ID. An in vitro analysis of separation of multi-use ProTaper Universal and ProTaper next instruments in extracted mandibular molar teeth [J]. Scanning, 2015, 37(4)∶270-276
[3] Grande NM, Ahmed HM, Cohen S, et al. Current assessment of reciprocation in endodontic preparation: a comprehensive review—part I: historic perspectives and current applications [J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(11)∶1778-1783
[4] Uygun AD, Kol E, Topcu MKC, et al. Variations in cyclic fatigue resistance among ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal instruments at different levels [J]. Int Endod J, 2016, 5(49)∶494-499
[5] Kaval ME, Capar ID, Ertas H. Evaluation of the cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of novel nickel-titanium rotary files with various alloy properties [J]. J Endod, 2016, 42(12)∶1840-1843
[6] Pirani C, Ruggeri O, Cirulli PP, et al. Metallurgical analysis and fatigue resistance of WaveOne and ProTaper nickel-titanium instruments [J]. Odontology, 2014, 102(2)∶211-216
[7] Patiño PV, Biedma BM, Nogueira JR, et al. Fracture rate of nickel-titanium instruments using continuous versus alternating rotation [J]. Endod Prac Today, 2008, 2(3)∶193-197
[8] Webber J, Machtou P, Pertot W, et al. The WaveOne single-file reciprocating system [J]. Roots, 2011, 1(1)∶28-33
[9] 王天,李桂红. M-Wire镍钛根管预备器械研究进展[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2017,31(3)∶162-164
[10] Shim KS, Oh S, Kum K, et al. Mechanical and metallurgical properties of various nickel-titanium rotary instruments [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2017, 2017∶4528601
[11] 占云燕,杨国斌.ProTaperNext锉和WaveOne锉根管成形能力的对比研究[J].口腔医学研究,2016,32(9)∶925-928
[12] Wu H, Peng C, Bai Y, et al. Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals [J]. BMC Oral Health, 2015, 15(1): 27
[13] Ye J, Gao Y. Metallurgical characterization of M-wire nickel-titanium shape memory alloy used for endodontic rotary instruments during low-cycle fatigue [J]. J Endod, 2012, 38(1)∶105-107
[14] Kfir A, Elkes D, Pawar A, et al. Incidence of microcracks in maxillary first premolars after instrumentation with three different mechanized file systems: a comparative ex vivo study [J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2017, 21(1)∶405-411
[15] Yoo YS, Cho YB. A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating NiTi instruments in simulated curved canals [J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2012, 37(4)∶220-227
[16] Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Paolino DS, et al. Canal shaping with WaveOne primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system: a comparative study [J]. J Endod,2012,38(4)∶505-509
[17] Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, et al. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper [J]. Int Endod J, 2012, 45(5)∶449-461
[18] Kim HC, Hwang YJ, Jung DW, et al. Micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy comparisons of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments used with reciprocating motion [J]. Scanning, 2013, 35(2)∶112-118
[19] Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, et al. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals [J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(6)∶852-856
[20] Dhingra A, Gupt R, Singh A. Comparison of centric ability of Protaper Next, WaveOne & Protaper using cone beam computed tomography [J]. Endodontology, 2014, 26(2)∶109-112
[21] Mcray B, Cox TC, Cohenca N, et al. A micro-computed tomography-based comparison of the canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal rotary and WaveOne reciprocating files [J]. Quintessence Int, 2014, 45(2)∶101-108
[22] 鲁杰,于淼,仪虹,等. 机用单根锉WaveOne与ProTaper镍钛器械对重度弯曲根管的预备及评价[J].中国医刊,2015,50(1)∶58-60
[23] Agarwal RS, Agarwal J, Jain P, et al. Comparative analysis of canal centering ability of different single file systems using cone beam computed tomography-an in-vitro study [J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2015, 9(5)∶zc06-zc10
[24] Barbosa-Ribeiro M, Albergaria SJ, Malvar MDFG, et al. Canal transportation and centering ability of curved root canals prepared using rotary and reciprocating systems [J]. Braz J Oral Sci, 2015, 14(3)∶214-218
[25] Gagliardi J, Versiani MA, de Sousa-Neto MD, et al. Evaluation of the shaping characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Universal in curved canals [J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(10)∶1718-1724
[26] Hoppe CB, Böttcher DE, Justo AM, et al. Comparison of curved root canals preparation using reciprocating, continuous and an association of motions [J]. Scanning, 2016, 38(5)∶462-468
[27] Mamede-Neto I, Borges ÁH, Alencar AHG, et al. Multidimensional analysis of curved root canal preparation using continuous or reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments [J]. Open Dent J, 2018, 12(1)∶32-45
[28] Li SH, Lu Y, Song D, et al. Occurrence of dentinal microcracks in severely curved root canals with ProTaper Universal, WaveOne, and ProTaper Next file systems [J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(11)∶1875-1879