Study on Registration Accuracy of Auxiliary Registration Device for Severe Artifact Registration

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.04.008

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To explore the registration accuracy of a universal auxiliary registration device for CBCT and optical scanning before virtual implantation planning under severe artifact condition. Methods: Twenty-two patients with dentition defects requiring guided implant surgery were included in the study. Patients with intraoral metal prosthesis were included in the experimental group, and CBCT and model scan were registered using the auxiliary registration device (n=11). Patients without any metal products in the mouth were included in the control group, and the registration was completed with teeth as the registration reference marks (n=11). After the registration of two groups, the registration deviation was analyzed, and the standard deviation (SD), root mean square value (RMS), and mean deviation (±AVG) of the reference blocks' registration deviation were recorded. Results: The registration deviation SD, RMS, +AVG, and -AVG values of the CBCT reconstructed reference block and the optical scan reference block in the experimental group and the control group were (0.16±0.04) mm, (0.17±0.03) mm, (0.14±0.04) mm, (0.15±0.04) mm and (0.14±0.03) mm, (0.16±0.02) mm, (0.13±0.03) mm, (0.13±0.04) mm, respectively. There was no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group (P>0.05). Conclusion: In the case of severe metallic artifact, the general auxiliary registration device can achieve a high registration accuracy.

Key words: implant guide, image registration, cone beam computed tomography, deviation analysis

WU Kaixin, WEI Luming, SU Ming, YUAN Changyong, WANG Penglai. Study on Registration Accuracy of Auxiliary Registration Device for Severe Artifact Registration[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2022, 38(4): 330-334.

References

[1] Tan K, Pjetursson BE, Lang NP, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2004,15(6):654-666.
[2] Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, et al. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(2):119-130.
[3] Nkenke E, Zachow S, Benz M, et al. Fusion of computed tomography data and optical 3D images of the dentition for streak artefact correction in the simulation of orthognathic surgery[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2004, 33(4):226-232.
[4] Flügge T, Derksen W, Te PJ, et al. Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans -A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(9):1113-1118.
[5] Flügge TV, Nelson K, Schmelzeisen R, et al. Three-dimensional plotting and printing of an implant drilling guide: simplifying guided implant surgery[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2013, 71(8):1340-1346.
[6] Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24 Suppl:92-109.
[7] Carr AB, Revuru VS, Lohse CM. Association of systemic conditions with dental implant failures in 6,384 patients during a 31-year follow-up period[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2017, 32(5):1153-1161.
[8] Yuan C, Wei L, Li X, et al. A technique for registering digital dental casts onto cone beam computed tomography scans with excessive metallic artifacts[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021, 125(1):29-33.
[9] Ritter L, Reiz SD, Rothamel D, et al. Registration accuracy of three-dimensional surface and cone beam computed tomography data for virtual implant planning[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(4):447-452.
[10] Nagarajappa AK, Dwivedi N, Tiwari R. Artifacts: The downturn of CBCT image[J]. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 2015, 5(6):440-445.
[11] Rangel FA, Maal TJ, Bergé SJ, et al. Integration of digital dental casts in cone-beam computed tomography scans[M]. 2012.
[12] Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Martens K, et al. An image-guided planning system for endosseous oral implants[J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 1998, 17(5):842-852.
[13] 李康,朱芷仪,孙雨虹,等.位点保存和数字化种植导板技术修复上前牙美学缺陷一例[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2018,53(8):561-563.
[14] Fan S, Hung K, Bornstein MM, et al. The effect of the configurations of fiducial markers on accuracy of surgical navigation in zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2019, 34(1):85-90.

[1]	JIANG Xiangrui, XUE Kun, LI Baozuo. Influence of Different Bone Types on Accuracy of Digital Dental Implant Guide [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2022, 38(2): 134-137.
[2]	CONG Peilin, ZHANG Fuhua. Cone Beam CT Study on Root and Canal System of Maxillary Premolars and Their Relationship with Maxillary Sinus [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2022, 38(1): 60-64.
[3]	HUANG Wenbo, DU Shenzhao, ZENG Jing, GU Yaodong. Comparative Study on Images of Full Crown with Four Kinds of Restoration Materials by CBCT and MSCT [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(12): 1094-1098.
[4]	RU Yue, LIU Guoliang, WANG Ling. Clinical Effect of Digital Positioning Guide Template in Extraction of Complete Bone Impacted Teeth [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(12): 1108-1114.
[5]	CUI Qingying, CHEN Siyu, FU Shuai, ZHANG Changbin, MA Wen, LI Ming. Extraction of Deeply Impacted Supernumerary Tooth in Anterior Maxilla through the Floor of Nasal Cavity [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2019, 35(7): 686-689.
[6]	LI Jun, WANG Zi-yi, ZHANG Xiao-dong. CBCT Analysis of Mesiodistal Angulation of Maxillary Molars for Female Patient with Skeletal Class Ⅱ Malocclusion [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2018, 34(8): 896-901.
[7]	WANG Li-xia, SHEN Jing, HAN Lei, YUE Xin, GAO Jing. Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study on Furcation Anatomy of Mandibular First Molars [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2018, 34(7): 738-741.
[8]	CHEN Li-yan, LIU Zhi-jie, YUAN Fang-lian, ZHANG Miao-miao, WANG Lan-zhu.. Bone Width and Cortical Bone Thickness of Infrazygomatic Crest Analysed with Cone Beam Computed Tomography. [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2017, 33(6): 637-641.
[9]	YANG Cai-xia, LI Cheng. Three-dimensional Alterations of Pharyngeal Airway in Skeletal Class Ⅱ Adolescents Undergoing Nonextraction Treatment [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2017, 33(10): 1118-1122.
[10]	Ying,QU Zhe,MA Lan,HAN Wen-li. Anatomical Presentation of Sinus Membrane and Ostium in Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Scan [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2016, 32(8): 853-856.
[11]	LI Si-yi, WU Li-an. Double Canals in Several Mandibular Incisors by CBCT: Two Cases Report. [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2016, 32(4): 416-417.
[12]	WANG Yuan, ZHANG Juan, LI Ze-kui, LI Hong-fa.. Radiographic Features of Mandibular Cone Beam Computed Tomography Film in Patients with Idiopathic Condylar Resorption. [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2016, 32(2): 181-184.
[13]	WU Si-yuan, AI Yi-long, LIU Cheng-jun. Evaluation of Micro-osteotomy Assisted Orthodontics Treatment on Alveolar Bone Dehiscence. [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2016, 32(12): 1292-1295.
[14]	WANG Wen-jun, MA Min.. Dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analyses of Resorption of Labial Bone in Maxillary Anterior Implant by Bone Splitting Technique. [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2015, 31(5): 497-499.
[15]	ZHAO Hai-jiao,TAN Li-si, WANG Hong-yan, ZHAO Jian, PAN Chun-ling, PAN Ya-ping. Effect of Initial Periodontal Therapy on Alveolar Bone in Patients with Chronic Periodontitis: an Evaluation with CBCT [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2015, 31(10): 1008-1012.