口腔医学研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 476-479.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.05.015

• 口腔种植学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

种植二期手术同期临时冠塑形牙龈的临床观察

刘晓庆, 周弘*   

  1. 郑州大学第一附属医院口腔科 河南 郑州 450052
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-10 出版日期:2019-05-28 发布日期:2019-05-21
  • 通讯作者: 周弘,E-mail:15138930086@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘晓庆(1992~ ),女,河南人,硕士在读,医师,研究方向:口腔种植。
  • 基金资助:
    河南省科技攻关项目(编号:152102310055)

Clinical Observation of Gingival Shaping by Temporary Crown during Second-stage Surgery of Implantation.

LIU Xiao-qing, ZHOU Hong*   

  1. Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhenzhou University, Zhenzhou 450052, China.
  • Received:2018-10-10 Online:2019-05-28 Published:2019-05-21

摘要: 目的: 评估单颗上前牙种植二期手术同期临时冠塑形牙龈的美学评分与患者满意度的相关性。方法: 依纳入标准选取单颗上前牙缺失患者30例,种植二期手术同期临时冠塑形牙龈,3~6个月后永久修复。永久修复1年后用红色美学分值PES及白色美学分值WES进行美学评分;以视觉测量尺VAS测量患者主观满意度;分析PES与WES、VAS与PES和WES之间的相关性。结果: PES平均得分(8.03±0.85),WES平均得分(8.10±0.40),PES值与WES值存在正相关关系(r=0.90,P<0.01);VAS平均得分为(8.68±0.58),VAS值与PES值和WES值均存在正相关关系(r=0.93,P<0.01;r=0.81,P<0.01)。结论: 单颗上前牙二期手术同期临时冠塑形牙龈后再永久修复可获得较好的美学效果和较高的患者满意度,PES与WES、VAS与PES和WES均存在相关性。

关键词: 种植修复, 临时冠塑形, 患者满意度, 美学评估

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the correlation between the esthetic score and the satisfaction of the patients by temporary crown gingival shaping performed during the maxillary anterior single-tooth implant second-stage surgery. Methods: 30 patients with single anterior teeth loss were selected according to the inclusion criteria before surgery. The temporary crown was used to shape the gingiva during the second-stage surgery. Permanent restoration was completed after 3-6 months. The pink esthetic score (PES) and white esthetic score (WES) were used for aesthetically evaluation 1 year after permanent restoration and the visual analog scale (VAS) was used for subjective satisfaction of patients. The correlation between PES and WES, VAS and PES, and VAS and WES was analyzed. Results: The average score of PES and WES were (8.03+0.85) and (8.10+0.40). PES value and WES value were significantly positive correlated (r=0.90,P<0.01). The average score of VAS was (8.68+0.58). VAS was significantly positive correlated with PES value and WES value (r=0.93,P<0.01; r=0.81, P<0.01). Conclusion: Permanent restoration of the maxillary anterior single-tooth implant with temporary crown shaping during second-stage surgery can achieve good aesthetic effect and high satisfaction. There is a high correlation between PES and WES, VAS and PES, and VAS and WES.

Key words: Implant restoration, Temporary crown shaping, Patient satisfaction, Aesthetic evaluation