提高通用粘接剂与牙本质粘接性能的研究进展

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.10.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 口腔粘接剂在牙体组织修复治疗中具有重要作用。通用粘接剂逐渐在口腔临床应用普及,它可以应用于不同的粘接模式,粘接多种材料,简化了粘接过程,提高了粘接效率。但由于牙本质的高蛋白和高含水量,通用粘接剂与牙本质的粘接仍然存在缺陷,许多研究正在寻找提高通用粘接剂与牙本质粘接性能的方法。本文旨在对如何提高通用粘接剂与牙本质粘接性能的方法进行综述。

关键词: 通用粘接剂, 牙本质, 粘接强度

Abstract: Oral adhesive plays an important role in the treatment of dental restoration. Universal adhesive is gradually widely used in oral clinic. It can be applied to different bonding modes, bonding a variety of materials, simplifying the bonding process and improving the bonding efficiency. However, due to the high protein and high water content of dentin, there are still some defects in the bonding between universal adhesive and dentin. Many studies are performed to improve the bonding performance between universal adhesive and dentin. The purpose of this review is to review the methods to improve the bonding properties between universal adhesives and dentin.

Key words: universal adhesive, dentin, bonding strength

朱轩言, 朱松. 提高通用粘接剂与牙本质粘接性能的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(10): 883-885.

ZHU Xuanyan, ZHU Song. Research Progress on Improving Bonding Properties of Universal Adhesives to Dentin[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(10): 883-885.

参考文献

[1] Ouchi H, Takamizawa T, Tsubota K, et al. The effects of aluminablasting on bond durability between universal adhesives and tooth substrate [J]. Oper Dent, 2020, 45(2): 196-208.
[2] Takamizawa T, Imai A, Hirokane E, et al. SEM observation of novel characteristic of the dentin bond interfaces of universal adhesives [J]. Dent Mater, 2019, 35(12): 1791-1804.
[3] Carretero V, Giner-Tarrida L, Penate L, et al. Shear bond strength of nanohybrid composite to biodentine with three different adhesives [J]. Coatings, 2019, 9(12): 783.
[4] Comba A, Maravic T, Valente L, et al. Effect of benzalkonium chloride on dentin bond strength and endogenous enzymatic activity [J]. J Dent, 2019, 85: 25-32.
[5] 钱鑫,张志民.化学交联剂对树脂牙本质粘接稳定性的影响[J].口腔医学研究,2020,36(3): 203-205.
[6] Machado AHS, Garcia IM, Motta ASD, et al. Triclosan-loaded chitosan as antibacterial agent for adhesive resin [J]. J Dent, 2019, 83: 33-39.
[7] Braga RR, Fronza BM. The use of bioactive particles and biomimetic analogues for increasing the longevity of resin-dentin interfaces: A literature review [J]. Dent Mater J, 2020, 39(1): 62-68.
[8] Souza MYd, Jurema ALB, Caneppele TMF, et al. Six-month performance of restorations produced with the ethanol-wet-bonding technique: A randomized trial [J]. Braz Oral Res, 2019, 33: e052.
[9] Matos AB, Trevelin LT, Silva BTFD, et al. Bonding efficiency and durability: Current possibilities [J]. Braz Oral Res, 2017, 31(suppl 1):e57.
[10] 葛弋民,李轲,陈玥,等.通用型粘接剂临床应用的现状及展望[J].东南大学学报:医学版,2019,38(4): 741-746.
[11] Vasconcelos E Cruz J, Polido M, Brito J, et al. Dentin bonding and SEM analysis of a new experimental universal adhesive system containing a dendrimer [J]. Polymers (Basel), 2020, 12(2): 461.
[12] Elkaffas AA, Hamama HHH, Mahmoud SH. Do universal adhesives promote bonding to dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2018, 43(3): e29.
[13] Nagarkar S, Theis-Mahon N, Perdigao J. Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance [J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2019, 107(6): 2121-2131.
[14] Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, et al. From buonocore's pioneering acid-etch technique to self-adhering restoratives. A status perspective of rapidly advancing dental adhesive technology [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2020, 22(1): 7-34.
[15] Bridi EC, Leme-Kraus AA, Basting RT, et al. Long-term nanomechanical properties and gelatinolytic activity of titanium tetrafluoride-treated adhesive dentin interface [J]. Dent Mater, 2019, 35(10): 1471-1478.
[16] Maravic T, Comba A, Cunha SR, et al. Long-term bond strength and endogenous enzymatic activity of a chlorhexidine-containing commercially available adhesive [J].J Dent, 2019, 84: 60-66.
[17] Serafim MFD, Leal AMA, Bauer J, et al. Effect of an hydrophobic layer on a universal adhesive [J]. Rev Gaúch Odontol, 2018, 66(4): 339-344.
[18] Angel Munoz M, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez I, et al. Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the bonding efficacy of three universal adhesives [J]. J Dent, 2014, 42(5): 595-602.
[19] Vinagre A, Ralho A, Ramos N, et al. Bonding performance of a universal adhesive: Effect of hydrophobic resin coating and long-term water storage [J]. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac, 2019, 60(3): 96-103.
[20] Perdigao J, Ceballos L, Giraldez I, et al. Effect of a hydrophobic bonding resin on the 36-month performance of a universal adhesive-a randomized clinical trial [J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2020, 24(2): 765-776.
[21] Ahmed MH, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, et al. Do universal adhesives benefit from an extra bonding layer? [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2019, 21(2): 117-132.
[22] Saikaew P, Fu J, Chowdhury AFMA, et al. Effect of air-blowing time and long-term storage on bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin [J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2019, 23(6): 2629-2635.
[23] Awad MM, Alrahlah A, Matinlinna JP, et al. Effect of adhesive air-drying time on bond strength to dentin: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Int J Adhes Adhes, 2019, 90: 154-162.
[24] Saikaew P, Matsumoto M, Chowdhury AFMA, et al. of universal adhesives to dentin? [J]. Oper Dent, 2018, 43(5): 549-558.
[25] Fu J, Saikaew P, Kawano S, et al. Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strength of current one-step adhesives to dentin [J]. Dent Mater, 2017, 33(8): 895-903.
[26] Chasqueira AF, Luis J, Portugal J. Effect of saliva decontamination protocol on the adhesion to dentin with a universal adhesive [J]. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac, 2019, 60(2): 51-58.
[27] Haralur SB, Alharthi SM, Abohasel SA, et al. Effect of decontamination treatments on micro-shear bond strength between blood-saliva-contaminated post-etched dentin substrate and composite resin [J]. Healthcare (Basel), 2019, 7(4): 128.
[28] Kulkarni AS, Kokate S, Hegde V, et al. The effect of saliva contamination on shear bond strength of two universal bonding agents-an in vitro study [J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2018, 12(4): ZC6-ZC10.
[29] Kucukyilmaz E, Celik EU, Akcay M, et al. Influence of blood contamination during multimode adhesive application on the microtensile bond strength to dentin [J]. Niger J Clin Pract, 2017, 20(12): 1644-1650.
[30] Carualho CN, Francci CE, Costa JF, et al. Effect of filler and application mode on micro-shear bond strength of etch-and-rinse adhesive systems [J]. Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, 2015, 56(2): 89-94.
[31] Moritake N, Takamizawa T, Ishii R, et al. Effect of active application on bond durability of universal adhesives [J]. Oper Dent, 2019, 44(2): 188-199.
[32] Jang JH, Jeon BK, Mo SY, et al. Effect of various agitation methods on adhesive layer formation of hema-free universal dentin adhesive [J]. Dent Mater J, 2019, 38(1): 101-106.
[33] Loguercio AD, Salvalaggio D, Piva AE, et al. Adhesive temperature: Effects on adhesive properties and resin-dentin bond strength [J]. Oper Dent, 2011, 36(3): 293-303.
[34] Da Silva Sutil BG, Susin AH. Dentin pretreatment and adhesive temperature as affecting factors on bond strength of a universal adhesive system [J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2017, 25(5): 533-540.
[35] Akarsu S, Karademir SA. In vitro effect of temperature on dentin bond strength of universal adhesive systems [J]. Odovtos-International Journal of Dental Sciences, 2020, 22(1): 93-101.
[36] Zhang Y, Yu Q, Wang Y. Non-thermal atmospheric plasmas in dental restoration: Improved resin adhesive penetration [J]. J Dent, 2014, 42(8): 1033-1042.
[37] Golbari N, Kasraei S, Afrasiabi A, et al. Effect of diode laser (810 nm) irradiation on marginal microleakage of multi-mode adhesive resins in class v composite restorations [J]. J Lasers Med Sci, 2019, 10(4): 275-282.