青少年低角不同矢状骨面型颞下颌关节形态及位置的CBCT分析

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2024.01.013

口腔医学研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 66-72.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2024.01.013

青少年低角不同矢状骨面型颞下颌关节形态及位置的CBCT分析

郁馨, 左志刚, 杨子靓, 王瀚平, 赵艳红, 王悦^*

天津医科大学口腔医院正畸科天津 300070

收稿日期:2023-08-07 出版日期:2024-01-28 发布日期:2024-01-22
通讯作者: ^*王悦,E-mail:wangyue1@tmu.edu.cn
作者简介:郁馨(1980~ )女,天津人,硕士在读,主治医师,主要从事口腔正畸学诊疗研究工作。
基金资助:
天津市教委科研项目(课题号:2020KJ184)

CBCT Measurement and Analysis of TMJ Morphology and Position in Low Angle Adolescents with Different Sagittal Facial Types

YU Xin, ZUO Zhigang, YANG Ziliang, WANG Hanping, ZHAO Yanhong, WANG Yue^*

Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China

Received:2023-08-07 Online:2024-01-28 Published:2024-01-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:研究不同矢状骨面型青少年低角患者颞下颌关节形态及位置差异,探讨颞下颌关节与颅颌面部骨骼类型之间的关系。方法:选择11~16岁骨性Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ类低角患者各20例做为研究组,骨性Ⅰ类均角患者20例作为对照组,拍摄CBCT并导入Invivo 5.2软件获取头颅侧位及双侧关节影像,测量并进行统计学分析。结果:(1)Ⅰ类低角组髁突长轴径和冠状面髁突宽度、Ⅱ类低角组关节间隙以及Ⅲ类低角组关节窝深度等与眶耳平面-下颌平面角呈显著负相关。(2)与对照组相比,Ⅰ类低角组关节前间隙(P=0.022)和Ⅱ类低角组关节窝深度(P=0.027)等明显较大,Ⅲ类低角组关节结节斜度(P=0.017)和髁突水平角(P=0.016)明显较小。(3)Ⅰ类低角组髁头角和关节结节斜度等(P＜0.05)、Ⅱ类低角组关节内间隙(P≤0.01)以及Ⅲ类低角组髁头角(P＜0.01)等均显示右侧小于左侧。结论:不同矢状骨面型青少年低角患者颞下颌关节髁突形态、对称性、关节间隙等存在显著差异,正畸治疗中应予以重视,持续关注其髁突生长状态,以达到正畸后长期稳定的治疗效果。

关键词: 锥形束计算机体层摄影术, 颞下颌关节, 矢状骨面型, 青少年, 低角

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the difference of TMJ morphology and position in low angle adolescent patients with different sagittal skeletal surface types, and to explore the relationship between TMJ and craniofacial skeletal types. Methods: Twenty patients with low angle of skeletal class Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ aged 11-16 years were selected as the study group, and 20 patients with average angle of skeletal class Ⅰ were selected as the control group. The CBCT images were imported into Invivo5.2 software to obtain lateral cephalic and bilateral joint images, and the data were measured and investigated by statistical methods. Results: (1) There were significant negative correlations between FH-MP and condylar long axis diameter and condylar width in class Ⅰ low angle group, joint space in class Ⅱ low angle group and glenoid fossa depth in class Ⅲ low angle group. (2) Compared with the control group, the anterior joint space (P=0.022) in class Ⅰ low angle group and glenoid fossa depth (P=0.027) in class Ⅱ low angle group were significantly larger, and the articular eminence inclination (P=0.017) and horizontal condylar angle (P=0.016) in class Ⅲ low angle group were significantly smaller. (3) The condylar angle and articular eminence inclination (P<0.05) in class Ⅰ low angle group, mesial joint space (P≤0.01) in class Ⅱ low angle group, and condylar angle (P<0.01) in class Ⅲ low angle group showed that the right side was smaller than the left side. Conclusion: There are significant differences in the condyle shape, symmetry, and joint space of TMJ in adolescent patients with low angle of sagittal surface. Attention should be paid to the condyle growth status in orthodontic treatment, so as to achieve long-term stable treatment effect after orthodontic treatment.

Key words: cone-beam computed tomography, temporomandibular joint, sagittal skeletal pattern, adolescent, low angle

郁馨, 左志刚, 杨子靓, 王瀚平, 赵艳红, 王悦. 青少年低角不同矢状骨面型颞下颌关节形态及位置的CBCT分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2024, 40(1): 66-72.

YU Xin, ZUO Zhigang, YANG Ziliang, WANG Hanping, ZHAO Yanhong, WANG Yue. CBCT Measurement and Analysis of TMJ Morphology and Position in Low Angle Adolescents with Different Sagittal Facial Types[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2024, 40(1): 66-72.

参考文献

[1] 秦泗佳,梁昀曈,侯欣怡,等.颞下颌关节面与周围骨性结构关系的研究[J].解剖学研究,2023,45(3):269-272.
[2] Alimanovic D, Pedersen TK, Matzen LH, et al. Comparing clinical and radiological manifestations of adolescent idiopathic condylar resorption and juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the temporomandibular joint [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021, 79(4):774-785.
[3] 纳扎莱诺·巴塞提.修复与正颌正畸的垂直空间[M].陈江,张思慧.译.沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,2020.72-73.
[4] 冯靖雯,刘奕.正畸治疗中对颞下颌关节紊乱病的防治策略[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2023,16(2):143-146.
[5] Pullinger A, Hollender L. Variation in condyle-fossa relationships according to different methods of evaluation in tomograms [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1986, 62(6):719-727.
[6] Iwaszenko S, Munk J, Baron S, et al. New method for analysis of the temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography [J]. Sensors (Basel), 2021, 21(9):3070.
[7] Marpaung C, van Selms MKA, Lobbezoo F. Temporomandibular joint anterior disc displacement with reduction in a young population: Prevalence and risk indicators [J]. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2019, 29(1):66-73.
[8] Macrì M, Murmura G, Scarano A, et al. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders and its association with malocclusion in children: A transversal study [J]. Front Public Health, 2022, 10:860833.
[9] 王博.应用CBCT研究不同矢状骨面型患者颞下颌关节三维骨性结构[D].大连医科大学,2022.
[10] 周境,刘怡.不同垂直骨面型骨性Ⅱ类青少年女性颞下颌关节锥形束CT测量分析[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2021,53(1):109-119.
[11] 李羚毓.不同垂直骨面型的骨性Ⅲ类成年患者颞下颌关节形态的差异性研究[D].宁夏医科大学,2022.
[12] Michelotti A, Rongo R, D'Antò V, et al. Occlusion, orthodontics and temporomandibular disorders: Cutting edge of the current evidence [J]. J World Fed Orthod, 2020, 9(3S):S15-S18.
[13] De Stefano AA, Guercio-Monaco E, Hernández-Andara A, et al. Association between temporomandibular joint disc position evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging and mandibular condyle inclination evaluated by computed tomography [J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2020, 47(6):743-749.
[14] Ayyıldız E, Orhan M, Bahşil, et al. Morphometric evaluation of the temporomandibular joint on cone-beam computed tomography [J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2021, 43(6):975-996.
[15] 韩晓利,肖丹娜.成年女性骨性Ⅱ类不同垂直骨面型患者TMJ结构特征CBCT研究[J].继续医学教育,2019,33(1):59-62.
[16] 郑慧云,刘志超,王慧明.偏侧咀嚼对颞下颌关节结构的影响及其与颞下颌关节紊乱的关系[J].浙江大学学报(医学版),2023,52(3):386-393.
[17] Friedrich RE, Christ G, Scheuer HT, et al. Relationships of reference points, planes and skull symmetry on posterior-anterior cephalograms in healthy young adults [J]. In Vivo, 2021, 35(4):2227-2237.
[18] 郑嘉婧,张玥英,吴秋月,等.骨性Ⅱ类安氏Ⅱ类2分类患者颞下颌关节的三维空间的 CBCT分析研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2023,39(2):210-217.
[19] Song J, Cheng M, Qian Y, et al. Cone-beam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in permanent dentition according to Angle’s classification [J]. Oral Radiol, 2020, 36(3):261-266.
[20] Lin M, Xu Y, Wu H, et al. Comparative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of temporomandibular joint position and morphology in female patients with skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion [J]. J Int Med Res, 2019, 48(2):1-12.

青少年低角不同矢状骨面型颞下颌关节形态及位置的CBCT分析

CBCT Measurement and Analysis of TMJ Morphology and Position in Low Angle Adolescents with Different Sagittal Facial Types

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	赵琛, 商庆龙, 赵甜甜, 张毕承, 苏彤, 梁蓓蓓, 刘博宇. 高脂饮食对小鼠颞下颌关节骨关节炎的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(8): 707-714.
[2]	赵琛, 姜杉杉, 刘阳, 吴素然, 邱桐, 白月辉, 吴洁, 贾语婧. 液态浓缩生长因子联合透明质酸注射治疗对颞下颌关节骨关节炎的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(4): 362-369.
[3]	李林林, 向国林. 武汉市562名12~16岁青少年下颌第三磨牙生长发育的锥形束CT研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(3): 217-220.
[4]	罗良语, 刘钧. 颞下颌关节动态三维有限元模型构建的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(8): 715-717.
[5]	李佳珩, 曹东元. 应激在颞下颌关节紊乱病发病机制中的作用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(6): 501-504.
[6]	徐泽军, 满城. 间充质干细胞源性外泌体在颞下颌关节骨关节炎中的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(6): 509-512.
[7]	李真真, 吴瑶, 徐依山, 司超, 刘佳, 曹宇, 张惠超, 杨陆一. 不同骨面型患者蝶鞍尺寸的测量分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(6): 513-517.
[8]	吴瑶, 徐依山, 李真真, 司超, 刘佳, 曹宇, 张惠超, 杨陆一. 不同骨面型下颌颊棚区骨量的特征分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(4): 362-366.
[9]	周燕丽, 周薇娜, 于林凤, 王琛, 王冰洁, 张静露. 颞下颌关节盘移位患者髁突运动轨迹分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(2): 186-190.
[10]	庄欠志, 武秀萍. 甲状旁腺激素相关蛋白在下颌骨髁突软骨生长发育中的作用机制[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(9): 791-793.
[11]	胡敏, 贾一凡. 正畸治疗应如何规避颞下颌关节紊乱病的风险[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(7): 583-587.
[12]	邓天阁, 刘平, 刘昌奎, 张林林, 吴丽更, 周宏志, 丁宇翔, 胡开进. 翼外肌在创伤性颞下颌关节骨强直中的病理性作用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(5): 442-447.
[13]	林夕秋, 熊鑫, 吴聃, 陶然, 阿力米热·米吉提, 刘洋. 颞下颌关节积液患者的磁共振影像学特征观察及症状与生活质量的评估[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(5): 453-457.
[14]	张邀光, 房维. 颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(12): 1069-1072.
[15]	刘阳, 白月辉, 崔玉兰, 赵琛. 慢性睡眠剥夺对大鼠髁突MMP-2和MMP-9表达的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(11): 1009-1016.