Short-term Clinical Effect Evaluation of Trausim Implants

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.06.024

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To observe the short-term clinical effect of Trausim implants used and provide reference basis for its clinical application. Methods: A total of 24 subjects (46 implants) who received Trausim implants during June, 2016 to December, 2017 at the Implant Department, Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University were selected. The success rate, the survival rate, marginal bone loss of dental implants, and dental implant-related complication were followed up. The relevant clinical data were analyzed. Results: All implants were clinically osseointegrated and restored, which were followed up 0.5-1.5 years. There was one case of peri-implantitis, the survival rate was 100% and the success rate was 97.83%. The mesial marginal bone height was (0.15±0.43) mm, and the distal marginal bone height was (0.30±0.47) mm after 0.5-1.5 years follow-up. The mean peri-implant bone resorption was (0.23±0.33) mm. Conclusion: Trausim implants had satisfactory clinical effects in the case of strict control of indications and skilled operation, and its long-term efficacy needs further follow-up.

Key words: Trausim implants, Success rate, Survival rate, Marginal bone loss

WANG Li-ping, GUO Xue-qi, DONG Yu, CHEN Xi-li, CHEN Wei-hong, GE Lin-hu. Short-term Clinical Effect Evaluation of Trausim Implants[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2018, 34(6): 675-678.

References

[1] 张波, 邵磊, 赵宝红,等.下颌后牙区短种植体联冠修复短期临床效果评价[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2015,8(1):22-27
[2] 祝岩,万澎波,赵伟,等.不同牙种植体系统对种植体周围骨组织吸收的影响[J].中国组织工程研究,2016,20(30):4419-4424
[3] 莫嘉骥, 姒蜜思, 周仲豪,等.Trausim种植体植入早期骨结合性能评价[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志,2012,10(4):282-285
[4] Albrektsson T, Zarb GA, Worthington P, et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review of proposed criteria of success[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,1986, 1(1):11-25
[5] Sivolella S, Stellini E, Testori T, et al. Splinted and unsplinted short implants in mandibles: a retrospective evaluation with 5 to 16 years of follow-up [J]. J Periodontol, 2013, 84(4):502-512
[6] Devji T. Survival rates and marginal bone loss of zirconia implants are promising, but more evidence on long-term outcomes is needed [J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2017, 148(9):e128
[7] Mericske-Stern R, Grütter L, Rösch R, et al. Clinical evaluation and prosthetic complications of single tooth replacements by non-submerged implants [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2001, 12(4):309-318
[8] 刘星宇, 李昶, 雷婷婷,等.纯钛等离子涂层圆柱状骨内种植体与周围骨界面的三维结构分析[J].口腔医学研究,2017,33(7):729-732
[9] Niu W, Wang P, Zhu S, et al. Marginal bone loss around dental implants with and without microthreads in the neck: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 117(1):34-40
[10] Di Stefano DA, Giacometti E, Greco GB, et al. Effect of roughened micro-threaded implant neck and platform switching on marginal bone loss: a multicenter retrospective study with 6-year follow-up [J]. Quintessence Int, 2016, 47(9):759-765
[11] 李平, 戴静桃, 李安,等.种植体结构设计与种植体边缘的骨吸收:现状与争议[J].中国组织工程研究, 2014, 18(21):3406-3411
[12] Oliva J, Oliva X, Oliva JD. Five-year success rate of 831 consecutively placed Zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of three different rough surfaces [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2010, 25(2):336-344
[13] Moraschini V, Velloso G, Luz D, et al. Implant survival rates, marginal bone level changes, and complications in full-mouth rehabilitation with flapless computer-guided surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015, 44(7):892-901