Clinical Outcomes of Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation by Harvesting Half-columnar Block Bone from Ramus versus Rectangular Bone from Chin for Dental Implants in Aesthetic Zone-A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.09.012

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To compare clinical outcomes of ridge augmentation with half columnar block bone from ramus versus rectangular bone graft from chin. Methods: Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 received half-columnar autogenous bone graft from ramus, and Group 2 received rectangular bone graft from chin. Changes of ridge width and height in recipient area were measured. Results: Forty-seven patients (61 implants) were included. Immediately after bone grafting, ridge thickness increased (3.9±1.6) mm in Group I, and (3.3±1.8) mm in Group II with no significant difference. Four months later, the horizontal bone resorption at alveolar crest had no significant difference between Group 1 (0.59±0.69) mm and Group 2 (1.13±1.6) mm, while at the level of 4 mm below crest, the horizontal resorption in Group 1 (0.03±0.96) mm was significantly lower than Group 2 (0.87±1.16) mm. 1 year after loading, Group 1 exhibited significantly less marginal bone loss (0.13±0.65) mm than Group 2 (0.74±1.09) mm. Conclusion: Half-columnar group demonstrate a better bone graft stability than rectangular group at both 4 months after bone augmentation and 1year after loading.

Key words: Autogenous block bone graft , Half-columnar , Dental implant , Ramus, Chin

ZHAO Xue-zhu, TANG Zhi-hui, ZOU Li-dong, XU Wei-hua.. Clinical Outcomes of Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation by Harvesting Half-columnar Block Bone from Ramus versus Rectangular Bone from Chin for Dental Implants in Aesthetic Zone-A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2018, 34(9): 969-973.

References

[1] Pistilli R, Felice P, Piatelli M, et al. Blocks of autogenous bone versus xenografts for the rehabilitation of atrophic jaws with dental implants: preliminary data from a pilot randomised controlled trial [J] . Eur J Oral Implantol, 2014, 7(2)∶153-171
[2] Barone A, Covani U. Maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction with nonvascularized autogenous block bone: clinical results [J] . J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 65(10)∶2039-2046
[3] Pourabbas R, Nezafati S. Clinical results of localized alveolar ridge augmentation with bone grafts harvested from symphysis in comparison with ramus [J] . J Dent Res Clin Dent Prospects, 2007, 1(1)∶7-12
[4] Aloy-Prósper A, Pe arrocha-Oltra D, Pe arrocha-Diago M,et al. The outcome of intraoral onlay block bone grafts on alveolar ridge augmentations: A systematic review [J] . Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2015, 20(2)∶e251-e258
[5] 马士卿,张旭,孙迎春,等.引导骨组织再生膜的研究进展[J] .口腔医学研究,2016,32(3)∶309-310
[6] Cordaro L, Terheyden H.国际口腔种植学会口腔种植临床指南.口腔种植的牙槽嵴骨增量程序:分阶段方案[M] .宿玉成,译.辽宁科学技术出版社, 2016
[7] Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants [J] . Clin Oral Implant Res, 2006, 17(2)∶136-159
[8] Lee HG, Kim YD. Volumetric stability of autogenous bone graft with mandibular body bone: cone-beam computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction analysis [J] . J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015, 41(5)∶232-239
[9] Jensen SS, Terheyden H. Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials [J] . Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24 Suppl∶218-236
[10] von Arx T, Buser D. Horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and the guided bone regeneration technique with collagen membranes: a clinical study with 42 patients [J] . Clin Oral Implants Res, 2006, 17(4)∶359-366
[11] Rosenthal AH, Buchman SR. Volume maintenance of inlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton [J] . Plast Reconstr Surg, 2003, 112(3)∶802-811

[1]	ZHOU Liwei. A Retrospective Study on Occurrence of Mechanical Complications in Multi-unit Posterior Implants Combining Screw Fixation with Adhesive Fixation [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(1): 63-66.
[2]	MA Wen, WEI Yi, LU Lin, FU Shuai, ZHANG Changbin, CUI Qingying, PENG Canbang, WANG Lidong, XU Yanhua, LI Ming. Application of Multi types of Digital Images Matching and 3D Printing Technology in the Treatment of Condylar Tumor [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(1): 81-86.
[3]	SU Weizhu, WANG Yining, MA Xiao. Assessment of Color Changes and Color Rebounds in Enamel, Dentin-enamel junction, and Dentine during Vital Bleaching [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(8): 786-792.
[4]	GUAN Tong,ZHANG Yanlei,SHI Shuangqing. Comparative Study on Hotspots of Stomatology Education Based on Chinese and Foreign Literature Analysis [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(7): 698-702.
[5]	TU Wenxing, FENG Yunxia. Research Progress on Effect of Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy on Temporomandibular Joint [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(6): 516-518.
[6]	ZHOU Yanmin, WANG Hanchi. A Review on Recent Update and Development in Implant Prosthesis and Its Complications [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(5): 405-409.
[7]	YU Ke, HE Xiaoping, WEN Cai, LIU Xulin, YANG Jian. Study on IL-6 Inhibitor Controlling Inflammatory Bone Absorption during Implant Healing in Rabbits [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(3): 251-254.
[8]	QIAN Yemei, PAN Guoqing, WANG Weihong, LOU Huiquan, LI Jingyi, ZHANG Zhe. Odontogenic Tumors in Southwest China Over a 14-year Retrospective Study of 494 Cases [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(2): 164-166.
[9]	GENG Shuangshuang, WANG Jian, YANG Li, FENG Xinxin, LU Lihua. Effect of Site Preservation on Periodontal Status of Periodontal Patients [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(11): 1022-1026.
[10]	JIA Shengnan, DI Ping, LIN Ye. Remodeling Pattern of Mandible after “All-on-4” Immediate Fixed Rehabilitation: A Radiographic Study [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(10): 957-961.
[11]	WANG Ning, YAN Xing. Research Progress on Preservation and Reconstruction of Gingival Papilla around Implants [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2019, 35(8): 741-743.
[12]	LI Xiuhua, YU Peng, TIAN Fucong, WANG Xiaoyan. Influence of Pre-phosphoric Acid Etching on Bonding Strength of Two-step Self-etching Adhesives to Enamel [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2019, 35(8): 748-751.
[13]	GUO Jin-cai, XIE Hui. Research Progress of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Treatment of Oral Submucous Fibrosis. [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2019, 35(5): 423-426.
[14]	GUO Fang, HUANG Shuo, ZHU Yong, XUE Yang, HU Min, GAO Yue-rong, LIU Chang-kui. Biomechanical Properties of Polyetheretherketone Prostheses Prepared by Three Different Processes [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2019, 35(4): 405-408.
[15]	YU Wan-qi, YANG Shi-hui, ZHOU Zhe, ZHOU Yan-min, ZHAO Jing-hui. Clinical Study on Minimally Invasive Maxillary Sinus Elevation with Simultaneous Implantation in Elderly Patients [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2019, 35(3): 258-261.